OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of orthodontically induced root resorption after treatment and the correlation with resorption found after 6 months of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-six patients (11-18 years) treated with fixed appliances and extraction of four premolars were examined with cone beam computed tomography before treatment, after 6 months of treatment (n = 97), and at the end of active treatment. The Malmgren Index was used to describe the degree of root resorption. RESULTS: Severe root resorption (>2 mm, score 3) was found in 25.6% of the patients at the end of treatment. Extreme root resorption was found in one patient. Root resorption was seen more frequently in the maxillary incisor region. There was no correlation between the severity of root resorption after 6 months and the amount observed at the end of treatment. Furthermore, no correlation was seen between treatment duration and the severity of root resorption. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant resorption was diagnosed in 25.6% of the patients, but no correlations, either with the resorption seen after 6 months or with the length of treatment, were found. Radiographic examination after 3 to 6 months of orthodontic treatment is too early and will not reduce the number of patients who will have teeth with severe root resorption.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of orthodontically induced root resorption after treatment and the correlation with resorption found after 6 months of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-six patients (11-18 years) treated with fixed appliances and extraction of four premolars were examined with cone beam computed tomography before treatment, after 6 months of treatment (n = 97), and at the end of active treatment. The Malmgren Index was used to describe the degree of root resorption. RESULTS: Severe root resorption (>2 mm, score 3) was found in 25.6% of the patients at the end of treatment. Extreme root resorption was found in one patient. Root resorption was seen more frequently in the maxillary incisor region. There was no correlation between the severity of root resorption after 6 months and the amount observed at the end of treatment. Furthermore, no correlation was seen between treatment duration and the severity of root resorption. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant resorption was diagnosed in 25.6% of the patients, but no correlations, either with the resorption seen after 6 months or with the length of treatment, were found. Radiographic examination after 3 to 6 months of orthodontic treatment is too early and will not reduce the number of patients who will have teeth with severe root resorption.
Authors: Carlos Estrela; Mike Reis Bueno; Ana Helena Gonçalves De Alencar; Rinaldo Mattar; José Valladares Neto; Bruno Correa Azevedo; Cyntia Rodrigues De Araújo Estrela Journal: J Endod Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.171
Authors: Belinda Weltman; Katherine W L Vig; Henry W Fields; Shiva Shanker; Eloise E Kaizar Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Dayla Thyeme Higashi; Avacir Casanova Andrello; Pedro Marcelo Tondelli; Dari de Oliveira Toginho Filho; Solange de Paula Ramos Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2016-10-29 Impact factor: 3.161