Literature DB >> 16027626

Apical root resorption 6 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy.

Isolde Smale1, Jon Artun, Faraj Behbehani, Diane Doppel, Martin van't Hof, Anne M Kuijpers-Jagtman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Individual predisposition might be a major reason for the observed variation in apical orthodontic root resorption. If so, resorption might be expressed during the initial stages of orthodontic therapy in patients at risk.
METHODS: To explore this hypothesis, we evaluated standardized, digitized periapical radiographs made before treatment (T1) and at a mean period of 6.4 months (SD 0.9) after placement of maxillary incisor brackets (T2) in 290 patients (age range, 10.1 to 57.1 years at T1). Anamnestic and treatment parameters were recorded according to a protocol, and maxillary incisor irregularity was measured on T1 study models.
RESULTS: The mean average root resorption for 4 incisors was 0.53 mm (SD 0.47), whereas the sample mean of the most severely resorbed tooth per patient was 1.18 mm (SD 0.86). A total of 4.1% of the patients had an average resorption of 1.5 mm or more, and 15.5% had at least 1 tooth with 2.0 mm or more resorption. The maximum amount of resorption was 4.4 mm. Multivariate linear regression showed that deviated root form and increased T1-to-T2 time period were risk factors for apical root resorption of the central incisors; normal root form and wide roots were preventive factors, with an explained variance of 14%. Similarly, long roots, narrow roots, and increased T1-to-T2 time period were risk factors for resorption of the lateral incisors, whereas normal root form was a preventive factor, with an explained variance of 24%. Parameters associated with use of rectangular wire, presence of incisor irregularity, and history of trauma were not identified as risk factors. Use of elastics was not included in the regression analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Root resorption can begin in the early leveling stages of orthodontic treatment. About 4.1% of patients studied had an average resorption of 1.5 mm or more of the 4 maxillary incisors, and about 15.5% had 1 or more maxillary incisors with resorption of 2.0 mm or more from 3 to 9 months after initiation of fixed appliance therapy. Although teeth with long, narrow, and deviated roots are at increased risk of resorption during this early stage, the explained variance of these risk factors is less than 25%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16027626     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  20 in total

1.  The influence of bracket type on the external apical root resorption in class I extraction patients - a retrospective study.

Authors:  Fang Qin; Yu Zhou
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Apical root resorption in maxillary incisors when employing micro-implant and J-hook headgear anchorage: a 4-month radiographic study.

Authors:  Qingzhu Wang; Wenjing Chen; Roger J Smales; Hui Peng; Xiaokun Hu; Lu Yin
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-18

3.  Root resorption diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography after 6 months of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance and the relation to risk factors.

Authors:  Dimitrios Makedonas; Henrik Lund; Kerstin Gröndahl; Ken Hansen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Comparison of root resorption between self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Vanessa Leite; Ana Claudia Conti; Ricardo Navarro; Marcio Almeida; Paula Oltramari-Navarro; Renato Almeida
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Apical root resorption: a prospective radiographic study of maxillary incisors.

Authors:  Ilken Kocadereli; Turkan Nadire Yesil; Pınar Sahin Veske; Serdar Uysal
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2011-07

Review 6.  Cellular and molecular changes in orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  Shahrul Hisham Zainal Ariffin; Zulham Yamamoto; Intan Zarina Zainol Abidin; Rohaya Megat Abdul Wahab; Zaidah Zainal Ariffin
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2011-10-19

7.  Root shortening in patients treated with two-step and en masse space closure procedures with sliding mechanics.

Authors:  Yan Huang; Xu-Xia Wang; Jun Zhang; Chao Liu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Root resorption diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography after 6 months and at the end of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.

Authors:  Dimitrios Makedonas; Henrik Lund; Ken Hansen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  The Radiological Assessment of Root Features and Periodontal Structures in Endodontically Treated Teeth Subjected to Forces Generated by Fixed Orthodontic Appliances. A Prospective, Clinical Cohort Study.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pustułka; Agata Trzcionka; Arkadiusz Dziedzic; Dariusz Skaba; Marta Tanasiewicz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  External apical root resorption in maxillary incisors in orthodontic patients: associated factors and radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Kamonporn Nanekrungsan; Virush Patanaporn; Apirum Janhom; Narumanus Korwanich
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2012-09-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.