Literature DB >> 36097248

Combining Machine Learning with Metabolomic and Embryologic Data Improves Embryo Implantation Prediction.

Aswathi Cheredath1, Shubhashree Uppangala2, Asha C S3, Ameya Jijo1, Vani Lakshmi R4, Pratap Kumar5, David Joseph6, Nagana Gowda G A7, Guruprasad Kalthur8, Satish Kumar Adiga9.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether combining metabolomic and embryologic data with machine learning (ML) models improve the prediction of embryo implantation potential. In this prospective cohort study, infertile couples (n=56) undergoing day-5 single blastocyst transfer between February 2019 and August 2021 were included. After day-5 single blastocyst transfer, spent culture medium (SCM) was subjected to metabolite analysis using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Derived metabolite levels and embryologic parameters between successfully implanted and failed groups were incorporated into ML models to explore their predictive potential regarding embryo implantation. The SCM of blastocysts that resulted in successful embryo implantation had significantly lower pyruvate (p<0.05) and threonine (p<0.05) levels compared to medium control but not compared to SCM related to embryos that failed to implant. Notably, the prediction accuracy increased when classical ML algorithms were combined with metabolomic and embryologic data. Specifically, the custom artificial neural network (ANN) model with regularized parameters for metabolomic data provided 100% accuracy, indicating the efficiency in predicting implantation potential. Hence, combining ML models (specifically, custom ANN) with metabolomic and embryologic data improves the prediction of embryo implantation potential. The approach could potentially be used to derive clinical benefits for patients in real-time.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANN; Blastocyst; Machine learning; Metabolomics; NMR spectroscopy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36097248     DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-01071-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   2.924


  43 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF.

Authors:  E B Baart; E Martini; I van den Berg; N S Macklon; R-J H Galjaard; B C J M Fauser; D Van Opstal
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cédric Le Caignec; Michèle Ampe; Peter Konings; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Mustapha Amyere; Miikka Vikkula; Frans Schuit; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Geert Verbeke; Thomas D'Hooghe; Yves Moreau; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  No evidence that embryo selection by near-infrared spectroscopy in addition to morphology is able to improve live birth rates: results from an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  C G Vergouw; M W Heymans; T Hardarson; I A Sfontouris; K A Economou; A Ahlström; L Rogberg; T G Lainas; D Sakkas; D C Kieslinger; E H Kostelijk; P G A Hompes; R Schats; C B Lambalk
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability.

Authors:  David K Gardner; Marcos Meseguer; Carmen Rubio; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  Timing of cell division in human cleavage-stage embryos is linked with blastocyst formation and quality.

Authors:  María Cruz; Nicolás Garrido; Javier Herrero; Inmaculada Pérez-Cano; Manuel Muñoz; Marcos Meseguer
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomic profiling of Day 3 and 5 embryo culture medium does not predict pregnancy outcome in good prognosis patients: a prospective cohort study on single transferred embryos.

Authors:  K Kirkegaard; A S P Svane; J S Nielsen; J J Hindkjær; N C Nielsen; H J Ingerslev
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Noninvasive assessment of human embryo nutrient consumption as a measure of developmental potential.

Authors:  D K Gardner; M Lane; J Stevens; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  D K Gardner; M Lane; J Stevens; T Schlenker; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Human pre-implantation embryo development.

Authors:  Kathy K Niakan; Jinnuo Han; Roger A Pedersen; Carlos Simon; Renee A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 10.  Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Charalampos S Siristatidis; Eleni Sertedaki; Dennis Vaidakis; Christos Varounis; Marialena Trivella
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.