Literature DB >> 11318205

Generalized estimating equations for ordinal categorical data: arbitrary patterns of missing responses and missingness in a key covariate.

A Y Toledano1, C Gatsonis.   

Abstract

We propose methods for regression analysis of repeatedly measured ordinal categorical data when there is nonmonotone missingness in these responses and when a key covariate is missing depending on observables. The methods use ordinal regression models in conjunction with generalized estimating equations (GEEs). We extend the GEE methodology to accommodate arbitrary patterns of missingness in the responses when this missingness is independent of the unobserved responses. We further extend the methodology to provide correction for possible bias when missingness in knowledge of a key covariate may depend on observables. The approach is illustrated with the analysis of data from a study in diagnostic oncology in which multiple correlated receiver operating characteristic curves are estimated and corrected for possible verification bias when the true disease status is missing depending on observables.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11318205     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00488.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

Review 1.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; R Edward Hendrick; Martin J Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Jean B Cormack; Lucy A Hanna; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence W Bassett; Carl J D'Orsi; Roberta A Jong; Murray Rebner; Anna N A Tosteson; Constantine A Gatsonis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A new method to address verification bias in studies of clinical screening tests: cervical cancer screening assays as an example.

Authors:  Xiaonan Xue; Mimi Y Kim; Philip E Castle; Howard D Strickler
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  A semiparametric model for wearable sensor-based physical activity monitoring data with informative device wear.

Authors:  Jaejoon Song; Michael D Swartz; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Karen Basen-Engquist
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 5.  Looking back at prospective studies.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias.

Authors:  Hua He; Jeffrey M Lyness; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Assessing discrimination of risk prediction rules in a clustered data setting.

Authors:  Bernard Rosner; Weiliang Qiu; Mei-Ling T Lee
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Estimation of the disease-specific diagnostic marker distribution under verification bias.

Authors:  John H Page; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 1.681

9.  Reducing decision errors in the paired comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests with Gaussian outcomes.

Authors:  Brandy M Ringham; Todd A Alonzo; John T Brinton; Sarah M Kreidler; Aarti Munjal; Keith E Muller; Deborah H Glueck
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.615

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.