Literature DB >> 23086332

Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin in class I restorations.

Alessandro Vichi1, Mariam Margvelashvili, Cecilia Goracci, Federica Papacchini, Marco Ferrari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess by means of shear bond strength tests (SBS), microleakage analysis (μLKG), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the bonding potential and sealing ability of a new self-adhering composite resin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: SBS and μLKG of Vertise Flow (VF, Kerr) were measured and compared to the all-in-one adhesive systems G-Bond (GB, GC), AdheSE One (AO, Ivoclar Vivadent), Adper Easy Bond (EB, 3M ESPE), Xeno V (XV, Dentsply), and iBOND (iB, Heraeus Kulzer). For each system, 20 molars were tested for SBS on dentin (n = 10) and enamel (n = 10). For μLKG assessment, 12 premolars per group were selected and small, box-shaped cavities were made. After restoration, the teeth were immersed in 50 wt% silver nitrate solution for 24 h. For each group, 10 randomly selected specimens were processed for leakage calculations, while two of the specimens were examined under SEM. Between-group differences in SBS to dentin and μLKG were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance followed by the Dunn's Multiple Range test. Enamel SBS data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey test.
RESULTS: On dentin and enamel, VF recorded the lowest SBS values that were statistically comparable to those measured by GB, iB, and AO. μLKG analysis showed the lowest percentage of stained interface for VF. Significantly greater extent of infiltration was seen for iB and EB.
CONCLUSIONS: Although VF resulted in lower bond strengths values on either dental substrate, better marginal sealing ability was visualized in comparison with all-in-one adhesive systems. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of the present study demonstrated satisfactory in vitro outcome of the self-adhering flowable composite resin VF when used to restore class I cavities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23086332     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0846-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  57 in total

1.  Relationship between nanoleakage and microtensile bond strength at the resin-dentin interface.

Authors:  Sandra Guzmán-Armstrong; Steven R Armstrong; Fang Qian
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

Review 2.  Surface interactions of dentin adhesive materials.

Authors:  R L Erickson
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.440

3.  Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel.

Authors:  D H Pashley; F R Tay
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step adhesives to dentine surrounded by bonded enamel.

Authors:  Shiva Torkabadi; Masatoshi Nakajima; Masaomi Ikeda; Richard M Foxton; Junji Tagami
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface.

Authors:  Lorenzo Breschi; Annalisa Mazzoni; Alessandra Ruggeri; Milena Cadenaro; Roberto Di Lenarda; Elettra De Stefano Dorigo
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  The effects of cavity size and filling method on the bonding to Class I cavities.

Authors:  Zhengdi He; Yasushi Shimada; Alireza Sadr; Masaomi Ikeda; Junji Tagami
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 7.  Recent advances in the theory and mechanism of adhesive resin bonding to dentin: a critical review.

Authors:  T K Vaidyanathan; Jayalakshmi Vaidyanathan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.368

8.  Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles.

Authors:  Yong-jie Wei; Nick Silikas; Zhen-ting Zhang; David C Watts
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Bonding characteristics of newly developed all-in-one adhesives.

Authors:  S K Sidhu; Y Omata; T Tanaka; K Koshiro; D Spreafico; S Semeraro; D Mezzanzanica; H Sano
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.368

10.  Microtensile bond strengths to enamel of self-etching and one bottle adhesive systems.

Authors:  P Pilecki; D G Stone; M Sherriff; T F Watson
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.837

View more
  23 in total

1.  Effect of different surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength of two self-adhesive flowable composites.

Authors:  Mustafa Altunsoy; Murat Selim Botsali; Tugrul Sari; Halenur Onat
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite.

Authors:  Jana Peterson; Marta Rizk; Monika Hoch; Annette Wiegand
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of one self-adhesive composite in dental hypersensitivity.

Authors:  R Pinna; A Bortone; G Sotgiu; S Dore; P Usai; E Milia
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Resin Composite.

Authors:  Norah Sibai; Aminah El Mourad; Nohair Al Suhaibani; Raghad Al Ahmadi; Sara Al Dosary
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-05-06

5.  Microshear bond strength of self-adhesive composite to ceramic after mechanical, chemical and laser surface treatments.

Authors:  Maryam Ghavam; Marjan Soleimanpour; Sedighe Sadat Hashemikamangar; Hooman Ebrahimi; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2017-12-31

6.  Do Laboratory Results Concerning High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomers versus Amalgam for Tooth Restorations Indicate Similar Effect Direction and Magnitude than that of Controlled Clinical Trials? - A Meta-Epidemiological Study.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch; Veerasamy Yengopal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Does the use of a novel self-adhesive flowable composite reduce nanoleakage?

Authors:  Abeer Abo El Naga; Mohammed Yousef; Rasha Ramadan; Sherif Fayez Bahgat; Lana Alshawwa
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2015-03-27

8.  Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and nanoleakage of conventional and self-adhering flowable composites to primary teeth dentin.

Authors:  Priyanka Sachdeva; Mousumi Goswami; Darrel Singh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

9.  Microleakage and characteristics of resin-tooth tissues interface of a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive systems.

Authors:  Xuan Vinh Tran; Khanh Quang Tran
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2021-05-18

10.  The shear bond strength of MTA with three different types of adhesive systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Nimish Tyagi; Chandrakar Chaman; Shashi Prabha Tyagi; Udai Pratap Singh; Apoorv Sharma
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.