Literature DB >> 25609032

Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of one self-adhesive composite in dental hypersensitivity.

R Pinna1, A Bortone, G Sotgiu, S Dore, P Usai, E Milia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical effectiveness over 12 weeks of Vertise Flow(™), a self-adhering composite, in dental hypersensitivity (DH).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted as a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Vertise Flow™ was compared to the following: (1) Universal Dentine Sealant, (2) Clearfil Protect Bond, and (3) Flor-Opal® Varnish. A total of 46 patients with 116 hypersensitive teeth were studied. Pain experience was generated by a cold stimulus and assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) of pain. The response was recorded before the application of the materials (pre-1), immediately after (post-1), at 1- (post-2), 2- (post-3), and 12-week controls (post-4). Statistical differences in VAS were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis analysis at the different time-points (P < 0.05), adjusting statistical significances for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni correction).
RESULTS: All the materials showed any statistically significant differences at the baseline. After the application of each material, a VAS decrease was demonstrated at every post-control. VF showed significant hypersensitivity reduction in post-1. Statistically significant relief was also observed in post-2 while no significant differences were detected in post-3 and post-4.
CONCLUSIONS: After 12-week controls, there was no statistically significant hypersensitivity reduction using VF in respect to the other materials. On the other hand, any significant differences were detected in the decrease of the VAS irrespective of the desensitizing agent employed at the 12-week controls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The significant increase in VAS scores within the 12-weeks of environment suggested there is instability of VF when used as desensitizing agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25609032     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1390-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  37 in total

1.  Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants.

Authors:  Federica Papacchini; Cecilia Goracci; Fernanda Tranchesi Sadek; Francesca Monticelli; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives.

Authors:  Kirsten L Van Landuyt; Johan Snauwaert; Jan De Munck; Marleen Peumans; Yasuhiro Yoshida; André Poitevin; Eduardo Coutinho; Kazuomi Suzuki; Paul Lambrechts; Bart Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant after 15 years.

Authors:  R J Simonsen
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Comparative evaluation of Nd:YAG laser and fluoride varnish for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Cankat Kara; Recep Orbak
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  The Gluma bonding system: a clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin.

Authors:  D F Davidson; M Suzuki
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots.

Authors:  M Ferrari; M C Cagidiaco; G Kugel; C L Davidson
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.522

7.  Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites.

Authors:  K J Söderholm; M Zigan; M Ragan; W Fischlschweiger; M Bergman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Mechanical properties and biochemical activity of remineralizing resin-based Ca-PO4 cements.

Authors:  Sabine H Dickens; Glenn M Flaim; Shozo Takagi
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Dentin hypersensitivity treated with a fluoride-containing varnish or a light-cured glass-ionomer liner.

Authors:  E K Hansen
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1992-12

Review 10.  Epidemiology of dentin hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Christian H Splieth; Aikaterini Tachou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effectiveness on oral pain of 808-nm diode laser used prior to composite restoration for symptomatic non-carious cervical lesions unresponsive to desensitizing agents.

Authors:  Felice Femiano; Rossella Femiano; Alessandro Lanza; Michele Lanza; Letizia Perillo
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Reducing dentine hypersensitivity with nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Vano; G Derchi; A Barone; R Pinna; P Usai; U Covani
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Polymer-Based Direct Filling Materials.

Authors:  Carmem S Pfeifer
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10

4.  Catechol-Functionalized Synthetic Polymer as a Dental Adhesive to Contaminated Dentin Surface for a Composite Restoration.

Authors:  Sang-Bae Lee; Carlos González-Cabezas; Kwang-Mahn Kim; Kyoung-Nam Kim; Kenichi Kuroda
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 6.988

5.  Effectiveness of Calcium Phosphate Desensitising Agents in Dental Hypersensitivity Over 24 Weeks of Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Paolo Usai; Vincenzo Campanella; Giovanni Sotgiu; Giovanni Spano; Roberto Pinna; Stefano Eramo; Laura Saderi; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Giacomo Derchi; Giorgio Mastandrea; Egle Milia
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 5.076

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.