M Knörgen 1 , S Brandt , S Kösling . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
PURPOSE: Comparison of dosage and spatial resolution of digital X-Ray devices with 3D-capability in head and neck imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three on-site X-Ray devices, a general purpose multi-slice CT (CT), a dedicated cone-beam CT (CBCT) and the CT-mode of a device for digital angiography (DSA) of the same generation were compared using paranasal sinus (PNS) and temporal bone imaging protocols. The radiation exposure was measured with a puncture measuring chamber on a CTDI head phantom as well as with chip-strate-dosimeters on an Alderson head phantom in the regions of the eyes and thyroid gland. By using the Alderson head phantom, the specific dosage of the X-Ray device with regard to different protocols was read out. For the assessment of the high-contrast resolution of the devices, images of a self-made phantom were qualitatively analysed by six observers. RESULTS: The three devices showed marked variations in the dosage and spatial resolution depending on the protocol and/or modus. In both parameters, CBCT was superior to CT and DSA using standard protocols, with the difference being less obvious for the investigation with PNS. CONCLUSION: For high-contrast investigations CBCT CT is a remarkable option in head and neck radiology. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
PURPOSE: Comparison of dosage and spatial resolution of digital X-Ray devices with 3D-capability in head and neck imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three on-site X-Ray devices, a general purpose multi-slice CT (CT), a dedicated cone-beam CT (CBCT) and the CT-mode of a device for digital angiography (DSA) of the same generation were compared using paranasal sinus (PNS) and temporal bone imaging protocols. The radiation exposure was measured with a puncture measuring chamber on a CTDI head phantom as well as with chip-strate-dosimeters on an Alderson head phantom in the regions of the eyes and thyroid gland. By using the Alderson head phantom, the specific dosage of the X-Ray device with regard to different protocols was read out. For the assessment of the high-contrast resolution of the devices, images of a self-made phantom were qualitatively analysed by six observers. RESULTS: The three devices showed marked variations in the dosage and spatial resolution depending on the protocol and/or modus. In both parameters, CBCT was superior to CT and DSA using standard protocols, with the difference being less obvious for the investigation with PNS. CONCLUSION: For high-contrast investigations CBCT CT is a remarkable option in head and neck radiology. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2012
PMID: 23081736 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rofo ISSN: 1438-9010