Literature DB >> 23078489

Family history of cancer and its association with breast cancer risk perception and repeat mammography.

Gillian Haber1, Nasar U Ahmed, Vukosava Pekovic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined the strength of association between family history of breast cancer and family history of other cancers with breast cancer risk perception and repeat mammography.
METHODS: The sample included 6706 women, aged 46 to 74 years, with no breast cancer history. Multinomial logistic regression assessed the association between family history of cancer and breast cancer risk perception. Structural equation modeling estimated the relationship between family history of cancer and repeat mammography.
RESULTS: Breast cancer risk perception was strongly associated with family history of breast cancer in the mother or mother and sister (odds ratio [OR] = 32.15; P < .001); family history of breast cancer in the sister, daughter, or male first-degree relative (OR = 6.6-8.4; P < .001); and maternal history of other cancers (OR = 1.38-2.73; P < .001). For repeat mammography, women with maternal history of breast cancer had a mean increase of 0.50 more mammograms in the past 6 years compared with women without maternal history of breast cancer (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer risk perception was associated with the type of cancer found in first-degree relatives and with the person's relationship to the family member with cancer. Family history of breast cancer affected repeat mammography behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23078489      PMCID: PMC3519312          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  24 in total

1.  Baseline predictors of initiation vs. maintenance of regular mammography use among rural women.

Authors:  Garth H Rauscher; Sarah Tropman Hawley; Jo Anne L Earp
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Breast cancer early detection, health beliefs, and cancer worries in randomly selected women with and without a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Miri Cohen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Bias associated with self-report of prior screening mammography.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cronin; Diana L Miglioretti; Martin Krapcho; Binbing Yu; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Tracy Onega; Eric J Feuer; Nancy Breen; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Accuracy of self-reports of Pap and mammography screening compared to medical record: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle Howard; Gina Agarwal; Alice Lytwyn
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening?

Authors:  L Tabár; S W Duffy; B Vitak; H H Chen; T C Prevost
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature.

Authors:  Kristin M Schueler; Philip W Chu; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival.

Authors:  Karen Blanchard; James A Colbert; Dhruv Puri; Joel Weissman; Beverly Moy; Daniel B Kopans; Emily M Kaine; Richard H Moore; Elkan F Halpern; Kevin S Hughes; Kenneth K Tanabe; Barbara L Smith; James S Michaelson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Mammographic screening and risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Bernard A Rosner; Susan E Hankinson; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  25 in total

1.  Women with Family History of Breast Cancer: How Much Are They Aware of Their Risk?

Authors:  Memnun Seven; Gülcan Bağcivan; Aygul Akyuz; Ferdağ Bölükbaş
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  An insight into clinical outcome of XPG polymorphisms in breast cancer.

Authors:  Saima Shakil Malik; Sumaira Mubarik; Nosheen Masood; Muhammad Tahir Khadim
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Correlation of MLH1 polymorphisms, survival statistics, in silico assessment and gene downregulation with clinical outcomes among breast cancer cases.

Authors:  Saima Shakil Malik; Ayisha Zia; Sumaira Mubarik; Nosheen Masood; Sajid Rashid; Alice Sherrard; Muhammad Bilal Khan; Muhammad Tahir Khadim
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Family History and Breast Cancer Risk Among Older Women in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Cohort.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Diana L Miglioretti; Weiwei Zhu; Joshua Demb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Brian Sprague; Jeffrey A Tice; Tracy Onega; Louise M Henderson; Diana S M Buist; Elad Ziv; Louise C Walter; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Molecular Mechanisms of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (BDE-47, BDE-100, and BDE-153) in Human Breast Cancer Cells and Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Authors:  Noriko Kanaya; Lauren Bernal; Gregory Chang; Takuro Yamamoto; Duc Nguyen; Yuan-Zhong Wang; June-Soo Park; Charles Warden; Jinhui Wang; Xiwei Wu; Timothy Synold; Michele Rakoff; Susan L Neuhausen; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S B Haga; W T Barry; R Mills; L Svetkey; S Suchindran; H F Willard; G S Ginsburg
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Ethnic differences and predictors of colonoscopy, prostate-specific antigen, and mammography screening participation in the multiethnic cohort.

Authors:  Brook E Harmon; Melissa A Little; Erica D Woekel; Reynolette Ettienne; Camonia R Long; Lynne R Wilkens; Loic Le Marchand; Brian E Henderson; Laurence N Kolonel; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Perceived versus objective breast cancer risk in diverse women.

Authors:  Julia Fehniger; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Leah Karliner; Karla Kerlikowske; Jeffrey A Tice; Jessica Quinn; Elissa Ozanne; Celia P Kaplan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?"

Authors:  Ariel Maschke; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Nancy R Kressin; Mara A Schonberg; Tracy A Battaglia; Christine M Gunn
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2021-01-17

10.  Uptake of cancer risk management strategies among women who undergo cascade genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Grace Tran; Brooke Levin; Kristin D Mattie; Brian Dreyer; Robert J Volk; Generosa Grana; Banu K Arun; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.