Literature DB >> 24667037

Ethnic differences and predictors of colonoscopy, prostate-specific antigen, and mammography screening participation in the multiethnic cohort.

Brook E Harmon1, Melissa A Little2, Erica D Woekel2, Reynolette Ettienne2, Camonia R Long2, Lynne R Wilkens2, Loic Le Marchand2, Brian E Henderson3, Laurence N Kolonel2, Gertraud Maskarinec2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Given the relation between screening and improved cancer outcomes and the persistence of ethnic disparities in cancer mortality, we explored ethnic differences in colonoscopy, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and mammography screening in the Multiethnic Cohort Study.
METHODS: Logistic regression was applied to examine the influence of ethnicity as well as demographics, lifestyle factors, comorbidities, family history of cancer, and previous screening history on self-reported screening participation collected in 1999-2002.
RESULTS: The analysis included 140,398 participants who identified as white, African American, Native Hawaiian, Japanese American, US born-Latino, or Mexican born-Latino. The screening prevalences overall were mammography: 88% of women, PSA: 45% of men, and colonoscopy: 35% of men and women. All minority groups reported 10-40% lower screening utilization than whites, but Mexican-born Latinos and Native Hawaiian were lowest. Men were nearly twice as likely to have a colonoscopy (OR=1.94, 95% CI=1.89-1.99) as women. A personal screening history, presence of comorbidities, and family history of cancer predicted higher screening utilization across modalities, but to different degrees across ethnic groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms previously reported sex differences in colorectal cancer screening and ethnic disparities in screening participation. The findings suggest it may be useful to include personal screening history and family history of cancer into counseling patients about screening participation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Colonoscopy; Ethnic differences; Mammogram; PSA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24667037      PMCID: PMC4325992          DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  42 in total

1.  Cancer screening - United States, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Colonoscopy utilization in the Black Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Kepher Makambi; Charles P Mouton; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Identifying barriers to colonoscopy screening for nonadherent African American participants in a patient navigation intervention.

Authors:  Jamilia R Sly; Tiffany Edwards; Rachel C Shelton; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2012-10-19

4.  Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States: results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Judith Swan; Nancy Breen; Barry I Graubard; Timothy S McNeel; Donald Blackman; Florence K Tangka; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Alex Boussioutas; Trevor Lockett; Ingrid Winship; Graham G Giles; Louisa B Flander; Louise Keogh; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-10-26

6.  Limited PSA testing in indigent men in South Texas: an appropriate care or missing a prevention opportunity?

Authors:  Yuanyuan Liang; Fei Du; Ian M Thompson; Barbara J Turner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Adherence to mammography and colorectal cancer screening in women 50-80 years of age the role of psychological distress.

Authors:  Suzy O'Donnell; Bram Goldstein; M Robin Dimatteo; Sarah A Fox; Cameron R John; John E Obrzut
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2010-09

8.  Perceived cancer risk: why is it lower among nonwhites than whites?

Authors:  Heather Orom; Marc T Kiviniemi; Willie Underwood; Levi Ross; Vickie L Shavers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Use of the prostate-specific antigen test among U.S. men: findings from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Louie E Ross; Zahava Berkowitz; Donatus U Ekwueme
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Racial differences in prostate cancer screening by family history.

Authors:  Bettina F Drake; Christopher S Lathan; Cassandra A Okechukwu; Gary G Bennett
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.797

View more
  15 in total

1.  Unraveling the Determinants to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Asian Americans: a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Sophia B Kim
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Susceptibility to Colorectal Cancer and Two Genetic Polymorphisms of XRCC4.

Authors:  Naghmeh Emami; Iraj Saadat; Shahpour Omidvari
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  County of Residence and Screening Practices among Latinas and Non-Latina Whites in Two Rural Communities.

Authors:  Catherine Duggan; Yamile Molina; Elizabeth Carosso; Genoveva Ibarra; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 1.847

4.  Association between sleep duration and breast cancer incidence: The multiethnic cohort.

Authors:  Maryssa Shigesato; Yosuke Kawai; Cherie Guillermo; Fadi Youkhana; Yurii B Shvetsov; Veronica W Setiawan; Christopher A Haiman; Loïc Le Marchand; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Risk factors for breast cancer in the breast cancer risk model study of Guam and Saipan.

Authors:  Rachael T Leon Guerrero; Rachel Novotny; Lynne R Wilkens; Marie Chong; Kami K White; Yurii B Shvetsov; Arielle Buyum; Grazyna Badowski; Michelle Blas-Laguaña
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Implications of false-positive results for future cancer screenings.

Authors:  Glen B Taksler; Nancy L Keating; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Bedouin Women's Gender Preferences When Choosing Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Authors:  Hadar Amir; Hanaa Abokaf; Yifat Amir Levy; Foad Azem; Eyal Sheiner
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2018-02

8.  The Impact of Receiving Predictive Genetic Information about Lynch Syndrome on Individual Colonoscopy and Smoking Behaviors.

Authors:  Joanne Soo-Min Kim; Peter C Coyte; Michelle Cotterchio; Louise A Keogh; Louisa B Flander; Clara Gaff; Audrey Laporte
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Predictive overbooking and active recruitment increases uptake of endoscopy appointments among African American patients.

Authors:  Folasade P May; Mark W Reid; Samuel Cohen; Francis Dailey; Brennan M R Spiegel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Multilevel Intervention Raises Latina Participation in Mammography Screening: Findings from ¡Fortaleza Latina!

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford; Dale McLerran; Ricardo Jimenez; Donald L Patrick; India Ornelas; Sonia Bishop; John R Scheel; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.