Literature DB >> 23078167

Similarity coefficients for binary chemoinformatics data: overview and extended comparison using simulated and real data sets.

Roberto Todeschini1, Viviana Consonni, Hua Xiang, John Holliday, Massimo Buscema, Peter Willett.   

Abstract

This paper reports an analysis and comparison of the use of 51 different similarity coefficients for computing the similarities between binary fingerprints for both simulated and real chemical data sets. Five pairs and a triplet of coefficients were found to yield identical similarity values, leading to the elimination of seven of the coefficients. The remaining 44 coefficients were then compared in two ways: by their theoretical characteristics using simple descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, multidimensional scaling, Hasse diagrams, and the recently described atemporal target diffusion model; and by their effectiveness for similarity-based virtual screening using MDDR, WOMBAT, and MUV data. The comparisons demonstrate the general utility of the well-known Tanimoto method but also suggest other coefficients that may be worthy of further attention.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23078167     DOI: 10.1021/ci300261r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  48 in total

1.  Homology models of mouse and rat estrogen receptor-α ligand-binding domain created by in silico mutagenesis of a human template: molecular docking with 17ß-estradiol, diethylstilbestrol, and paraben analogs.

Authors:  Thomas L Gonzalez; James M Rae; Justin A Colacino; Rudy J Richardson
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-28

2.  Euclidean chemical spaces from molecular fingerprints: Hamming distance and Hempel's ravens.

Authors:  Eric Martin; Eddie Cao
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Predicting protein-ligand affinity with a random matrix framework.

Authors:  Alpha A Lee; Michael P Brenner; Lucy J Colwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Quantum probability ranking principle for ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Mohammed Mumtaz Al-Dabbagh; Naomie Salim; Mubarak Himmat; Ali Ahmed; Faisal Saeed
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  An observational, prospective study to evaluate the preoperative planning tool "CI-Wizard" for cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Markus Pirlich; Mary Tittmann; Daniela Franz; Andreas Dietz; Mathias Hofer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Computer-Aided Drug Design Methods.

Authors:  Wenbo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

7.  Similarity and differential NMR spectroscopy in metabolomics: application to the analysis of vegetable oils with 1H and 13C NMR.

Authors:  Jan Schripsema
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 8.  Perspectives on the 2 × 2 Matrix: Solving Semantically Distinct Problems Based on a Shared Structure of Binary Contingencies.

Authors:  Hansjörg Neth; Nico Gradwohl; Dirk Streeb; Daniel A Keim; Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-09

9.  Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  Discrimination Ability of Assessors in Check-All-That-Apply Tests: Method and Product Development.

Authors:  Attila Gere; Dávid Bajusz; Barbara Biró; Anita Rácz
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.