Literature DB >> 33633620

Perspectives on the 2 × 2 Matrix: Solving Semantically Distinct Problems Based on a Shared Structure of Binary Contingencies.

Hansjörg Neth1, Nico Gradwohl1, Dirk Streeb2, Daniel A Keim2, Wolfgang Gaissmaier1.   

Abstract

Cognition is both empowered and limited by representations. The matrix lens model explicates tasks that are based on frequency counts, conditional probabilities, and binary contingencies in a general fashion. Based on a structural analysis of such tasks, the model links several problems and semantic domains and provides a new perspective on representational accounts of cognition that recognizes representational isomorphs as opportunities, rather than as problems. The shared structural construct of a 2 × 2 matrix supports a set of generic tasks and semantic mappings that provide a unifying framework for understanding problems and defining scientific measures. Our model's key explanatory mechanism is the adoption of particular perspectives on a 2 × 2 matrix that categorizes the frequency counts of cases by some condition, treatment, risk, or outcome factor. By the selective steps of filtering, framing, and focusing on specific aspects, the measures used in various semantic domains negotiate distinct trade-offs between abstraction and specialization. As a consequence, the transparent communication of such measures must explicate the perspectives encapsulated in their derivation. To demonstrate the explanatory scope of our model, we use it to clarify theoretical debates on biases and facilitation effects in Bayesian reasoning and to integrate the scientific measures from various semantic domains within a unifying framework. A better understanding of problem structures, representational transparency, and the role of perspectives in the scientific process yields both theoretical insights and practical applications.
Copyright © 2021 Neth, Gradwohl, Streeb, Keim and Gaissmaier.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2x2 matrix; Bayesian reasoning; contingency table; framing effects; problem solving; scientific measurement; transparency; visualization

Year:  2021        PMID: 33633620      PMCID: PMC7901600          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  53 in total

1.  Calculating measures of treatment effect for use in clinical practice.

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Charity J Morgan
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  A closer look at the probabilities of the notorious three prisoners.

Authors:  R Falk
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-06

3.  Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data.

Authors:  W S Cleveland; R McGill
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Evidence-based medicine: answering questions of diagnosis.

Authors:  Laura Zakowski; Christine Seibert; Selma VanEyck
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2004-02

5.  Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Elke Kurz-Milcke; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2007-11-01

6.  Focusing on what matters: Restructuring the presentation of Bayesian reasoning problems.

Authors:  Alaina N Talboy; Sandra L Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2018-10-08

7.  The psychology of the Monty Hall problem: discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser.

Authors:  Stefan Krauss; X T Wang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-03

8.  Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice.

Authors:  Robert Trevethan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-11-20

9.  A New Visualization for Probabilistic Situations Containing Two Binary Events: The Frequency Net.

Authors:  Karin Binder; Stefan Krauss; Patrick Wiesner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-26

Review 10.  Comprehension and computation in Bayesian problem solving.

Authors:  Eric D Johnson; Elisabet Tubau
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.