Literature DB >> 27589966

An observational, prospective study to evaluate the preoperative planning tool "CI-Wizard" for cochlear implant surgery.

Markus Pirlich1, Mary Tittmann2, Daniela Franz3, Andreas Dietz4,5, Mathias Hofer4,5.   

Abstract

"CI-Wizard" is a new, three-dimensional software planning tool for cochlear implant surgery with manual and semi-automatic algorithms to visualize anatomical risk structures of the lateral skull base preoperatively. Primary endpoints of the study represented the evaluation of the CI-Wizards usability, accuracy, subjectively perceived and objectively measured time in clinical practice. In a period from January 2014 to March 2015, n = 36 participants were included in this study. These members were divided into three groups of equal number (n = 12), but different level of experience. Senior doctors and consultants (group 1), residents (group 2) and medical students (group 3) segmented 12 different CT-scan data sets of the CI-Wizard (four per participant). In total, n = 144 data sets were collected. The usability of the CI-Wizard was measured by the given questionnaire with an interval rating scale. The Jaccard coefficient (JT) was used to evaluate the accuracy of the anatomical structures segmented. The subjectively perceived time was measured with an interval rating scale in the questionnaire and was compared with the objectively mean measured time (time interact). Across all three groups, the usability of the CI-Wizard has been assessed between 1 ("very good") and 2 ("with small defects"). Subjectively, the time was stated as "appropriate" by questionnaire. Objective measurements of the required duration revealed averages of t = 9.8 min for creating a target view. Concerning the accuracy, semi-automatic anatomical structures such as the external acoustic canal (JT = 0.90), the tympanic cavity (JT = 0.87), the ossicles (JT = 0.63), the cochlea (JT = 0.66), and the semicircular canals (JT = 0.61) reached high Jaccard values, which describes a great match of the segmented structures between the partcipants and the gold standard. Facial nerve (JT = 0.39) and round window (JT = 0.37) reached lower Jaccard values. Very little overlap tendency was found for the chorda tympani (JT = 0.11). This software program represents a further important step in the development of preoperative planning tools in cochlear implant surgery. The study revealed a high level of satisfaction in the usability. The subjectively required time was considered as "appropriate" and the objectively mean measured time was t = 9.8 min short enough, so that a clinical application seems realistic. Particularly for semi-automatically segmented structures, it represented a good accuracy. For purely manual segmented structures, further improvements are desirable. Finally, this program also provides a good learning tool for medical students and residents to become familiar with the anatomy of the lateral skull base.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlea; Cochlear implant surgery; Lateral skull base; Segmentation; Software planning tools

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27589966     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4286-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  27 in total

1.  3D visualisation of the middle ear and adjacent structures using reconstructed multi-slice CT datasets, correlating 3D images and virtual endoscopy to the 2D cross-sectional images.

Authors:  T Rodt; P Ratiu; H Becker; S Bartling; D F Kacher; M Anderson; F A Jolesz; R Kikinis
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  [Navigation-controlled cochleostomy. Is an improvement in the quality of results for cochlear implant surgery possible?].

Authors:  J Schipper; T Klenzner; A Aschendorff; I Arapakis; G J Ridder; R Laszig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  A new twist on a very old binary similarity coefficient.

Authors:  John Alroy
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited.

Authors:  Peter S Roland; Charles G Wright; Brandon Isaacson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Surgical planning tool for robotically assisted hearing aid implantation.

Authors:  Nicolas Gerber; Brett Bell; Kate Gavaghan; Christian Weisstanner; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weber
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  A robot-guided minimally invasive approach for cochlear implant surgery: preliminary results of a temporal bone study.

Authors:  Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau; Stephan Baron; Hubertus Eilers; Claas Baier; Bodo Heimann; Tobias Ortmaier; Sönke Bartling; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Leinung
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Similarity coefficients for binary chemoinformatics data: overview and extended comparison using simulated and real data sets.

Authors:  Roberto Todeschini; Viviana Consonni; Hua Xiang; John Holliday; Massimo Buscema; Peter Willett
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  A computed tomographic data-based vibrant bonebridge visualization tool.

Authors:  I Todt; H Lamecker; H Ramm; A Ernst
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2014-05

9.  Anatomical measurements of the cochlear aqueduct, round window membrane, round window niche, and facial recess.

Authors:  W Y Su; M S Marion; R Hinojosa; G J Matz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Surgical dimensions of the facial recess in adults and children.

Authors:  S A Bielamowicz; N J Coker; H A Jenkins; M Igarashi
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1988-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  The Literature of Chemoinformatics: 1978-2018.

Authors:  Peter Willett
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.