Literature DB >> 30740556

Homology models of mouse and rat estrogen receptor-α ligand-binding domain created by in silico mutagenesis of a human template: molecular docking with 17ß-estradiol, diethylstilbestrol, and paraben analogs.

Thomas L Gonzalez1, James M Rae2, Justin A Colacino1,3,4, Rudy J Richardson1,4,5.   

Abstract

Crystal structures exist for human, but not rodent, estrogen receptor-α ligand-binding domain (ERα-LBD). Consequently, rodent studies involving binding of compounds to ERα-LBD are limited in their molecular-level interpretation and extrapolation to humans. Because the sequences of rodent and human ERα-LBDs are > 95% identical, we expected their 3D structures and ligand binding to be highly similar. To test this hypothesis, we used the human ERα-LBD structure (PDB 3UUD) as a template to produce rat and mouse homology models. Employing the rodent models and human structure, we generated docking poses of 23 Group A ligands (17ß-estradiol, diethylstilbestrol, and 21 paraben analogs) in AutoDock Vina for interspecies comparisons. Ligand RMSDs (Å) (median, 95% CI) were 0.49 (0.21-1.82) (human-mouse) and 1.19 (0.22-1.82) (human-rat), well below the 2.0-2.5 Å range for equivalent docking poses. Numbers of interspecies ligand-receptor residue contacts were highly similar, with Sorensen Sc (%) = 96.8 (90.0-100) (human-mouse) and 97.7 (89.5-100) (human-rat). Likewise, numbers of interspecies ligand-receptor residue contacts were highly correlated: Pearson r = 0.913 (human-mouse) and 0.925 (human-rat). Numbers of interspecies ligand-receptor atom contacts were even more tightly correlated: r = 0.979 (human-mouse) and 0.986 (human-rat). Pyramid plots of numbers of ligand-receptor atom contacts by residue exhibited high interspecies symmetry and had Spearman r s = 0.977 (human-mouse) and 0.966 (human-rat). Group B ligands included 15 ring-substituted parabens recently shown experimentally to exhibit decreased binding to human ERα and to exert increased antimicrobial activity. Ligand efficiencies calculated from docking ligands into human ERα-LBD were well correlated with those derived from published experimental data (Pearson partial r p = 0.894 and 0.918; Groups A and B, respectively). Overall, the results indicate that our constructed rodent ERα-LBDs interact with ligands in like manner to the human receptor, thus providing a high level of confidence in extrapolations of rodent to human ligand-receptor interactions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  estrogen receptor-α; homology model; in silico mutagenesis; ligand-receptor docking; paraben analogs; species comparisons

Year:  2018        PMID: 30740556      PMCID: PMC6363358          DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2018.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Toxicol        ISSN: 2468-1113


  110 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The ligand binding profiles of estrogen receptors alpha and beta are species dependent.

Authors:  Heather A Harris; Ashok R Bapat; Daniel S Gonder; Donald E Frail
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.668

3.  Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA--a self-parameterizing force field.

Authors:  Elmar Krieger; Günther Koraimann; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-05-15

4.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure.

Authors:  Adrian A Canutescu; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Effects of butylparaben on the male reproductive system in rats.

Authors:  S Oishi
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.273

6.  ER-dependent estrogenic activity of parabens assessed by proliferation of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells and expression of ERalpha and PR.

Authors:  T Okubo; Y Yokoyama; K Kano; I Kano
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.023

7.  Homology modeling of the estrogen receptor subtype beta (ER-beta) and calculation of ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  R K DeLisle; S J Yu; A C Nair; W J Welsh
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.518

8.  In vitro and in vivo estrogenicity of UV screens.

Authors:  M Schlumpf; B Cotton; M Conscience; V Haller; B Steinmann; W Lichtensteiger
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Estrogenic activity of phenolic additives determined by an in vitro yeast bioassay.

Authors:  D Miller; B B Wheals; N Beresford; J P Sumpter
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Estrogen-astrocyte interactions: implications for neuroprotection.

Authors:  Krishnan M Dhandapani; Darrell W Brann
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  6 in total

1.  EO771, the first luminal B mammary cancer cell line from C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Augustin Le Naour; Yvonne Koffi; Mariane Diab; Delphine Le Guennec; Stéphanie Rougé; Sahar Aldekwer; Nicolas Goncalves-Mendes; Jérémie Talvas; Marie-Chantal Farges; Florence Caldefie-Chezet; Marie-Paule Vasson; Adrien Rossary
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 5.722

2.  A comprehensive analysis of racial disparities in chemical biomarker concentrations in United States women, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Vy Kim Nguyen; Adam Kahana; Julien Heidt; Katelyn Polemi; Jacob Kvasnicka; Olivier Jolliet; Justin A Colacino
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Endocrine Disruptors Induced Distinct Expression of Thyroid and Estrogen Receptors in Rat versus Mouse Primary Cerebellar Cell Cultures.

Authors:  Gergely Jocsak; Eniko Ioja; David Sandor Kiss; Istvan Toth; Zoltan Barany; Tibor Bartha; Laszlo V Frenyo; Attila Zsarnovszky
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-05

4.  A small-molecule activator of the unfolded protein response eradicates human breast tumors in mice.

Authors:  Matthew W Boudreau; Darjan Duraki; Lawrence Wang; Chengjian Mao; Ji Eun Kim; Madeline A Henn; Bingtao Tang; Sean W Fanning; Jeffrey Kiefer; Theodore M Tarasow; Elizabeth M Bruckheimer; Ramon Moreno; Spyro Mousses; Geoffrey L Greene; Edward J Roy; Ben Ho Park; Timothy M Fan; Erik R Nelson; Paul J Hergenrother; David J Shapiro
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-mediated coregulator binding and gene expression discriminates the toxic ERα agonist diethylstilbestrol (DES) from the endogenous ERα agonist 17β-estradiol (E2).

Authors:  Aziza Hussein Bakheit Adam; Laura H J de Haan; Ignacio Miro Estruch; Guido J E J Hooiveld; Jochem Louisse; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 6.691

Review 6.  Application of Various Molecular Modelling Methods in the Study of Estrogens and Xenoestrogens.

Authors:  Anna Helena Mazurek; Łukasz Szeleszczuk; Thomas Simonson; Dariusz Maciej Pisklak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.