Literature DB >> 8891638

Combined eye-head gaze shifts to visual and auditory targets in humans.

J E Goldring1, M C Dorris, B D Corneil, P A Ballantyne, D P Munoz.   

Abstract

We studied the characteristics of combined eye-head gaze shifts in human subjects to determine whether they used similar strategies when looking at visual (V), auditory (A), and combined (V + A) targets located at several target eccentricities along the horizontal meridian. Subjects displayed considerable variability in the combinations of eye and head movement used to orient to the targets, ranging from those who always aligned their head close to the target, to those who relied predominantly on eye movements and only moved their head when the target was located beyond the limits of ocular motility. For a given subject, there was almost no variability in the amount of eye and head movement in the three target conditions (V, A, V + A). The time to initiate a gaze shift was influenced by stimulus modality and eccentricity. Auditory targets produced the longest latencies when located centrally (less than 20 degrees eccentricity), whereas visual targets evoked the longest latencies when located peripherally (greater than 40 degrees eccentricity). Combined targets (V + A) elicited the shortest latency reaction times at all eccentricities. The peak velocity of gaze shifts was also affected by target modality. At eccentricities between 10 and 30 degrees, peak gaze velocity was greater for movements to visual targets than for movements to auditory targets. Movements to the combined target were of comparable speed with movements to visual targets. Despite the modality-specific differences in reaction latency and peak gaze velocity, the consistency of combinations of eye and head movement within subjects suggests that visual and auditory signals are remapped into a common reference frame for controlling orienting gaze shifts. A likely candidate is the deeper layers of the superior colliculus, because visual and auditory signals converge directly onto the neurons projecting to the eye and head premotor centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8891638     DOI: 10.1007/bf00229557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Gradation of isometric tension by different activation rates in motor units of cat flexor carpi radialis muscle.

Authors:  B R Botterman; G A Iwamoto; W J Gonyea
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Coordination of head and eye movements to fixate continuous and intermittent targets.

Authors:  M A Gresty
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Burst activity of identified tecto-reticulo-spinal neurons in the alert cat.

Authors:  A Grantyn; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Gaze shifts evoked by stimulation of the superior colliculus in the head-free cat conform to the motor map but also depend on stimulus strength and fixation activity.

Authors:  M Paré; M Crommelinck; D Guitton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Retinal eccentricity and the latency of eye saccades.

Authors:  R P Kalesnykas; P E Hallett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Subcortical contributions to head movements in macaques. I. Contrasting effects of electrical stimulation of a medial pontomedullary region and the superior colliculus.

Authors:  R J Cowie; D L Robinson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Auditory response properties of neurons in deep layers of cat superior colliculus.

Authors:  L Z Wise; D R Irvine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Gaze latency: variable interactions of head and eye latency.

Authors:  W H Zangemeister; L Stark
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Stimulation of the superior colliculus in the alert cat. II. Eye and head movements evoked when the head is unrestrained.

Authors:  A Roucoux; D Guitton; M Crommelinck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Saccadic responses evoked by presentation of visual and auditory targets.

Authors:  D Zambarbieri; R Schmid; G Magenes; C Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  40 in total

1.  Sensory and multisensory responses in the newborn monkey superior colliculus.

Authors:  M T Wallace; B E Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex.

Authors:  Arnaud Falchier; Simon Clavagnier; Pascal Barone; Henry Kennedy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cross-modal sensory processing in the anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  Paul J Laurienti; Mark T Wallace; Joseph A Maldjian; Christina M Susi; Barry E Stein; Jonathan H Burdette
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Long-distance feedback projections to area V1: implications for multisensory integration, spatial awareness, and visual consciousness.

Authors:  Simon Clavagnier; Arnaud Falchier; Henry Kennedy
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 6.  The development of a dialogue between cortex and midbrain to integrate multisensory information.

Authors:  Barry E Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Kinematics and eye-head coordination of gaze shifts evoked from different sites in the superior colliculus of the cat.

Authors:  Alain Guillaume; Denis Pélisson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Multisensory integration shortens physiological response latencies.

Authors:  Benjamin A Rowland; Stephan Quessy; Terrence R Stanford; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Age-related differences during a gaze reorientation task while standing or walking on a treadmill.

Authors:  Michael Cinelli; Aftab Patla; Bethany Stuart
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Behavioral studies of auditory-visual spatial recognition and integration in rats.

Authors:  Shuzo Sakata; Tetsuo Yamamori; Yoshio Sakurai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.