Literature DB >> 30367238

Purse-string approximation vs. primary closure with a drain for stoma reversal surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial.

Kunihiko Amano1, Hideyuki Ishida1, Kensuke Kumamoto2,3, Norimichi Okada1, Satoshi Hatano1, Noriyasu Chika1, Yusuke Tajima1, Tomonori Ohsawa1, Masaru Yokoyama1, Keiichiro Ishibashi1, Erito Mochiki1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stoma reversal carries a risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Purse-string approximation (PSA) has been reported as an attractive alternative to conventional primary wound closure for stoma reversal, but its efficacy is still under debate.
METHODS: Patients undergoing elective stoma reversal were randomized to undergo PSA or primary closure with a drain (PCD). All patients received preoperative bowel cleansing and antimicrobial prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of wound healing at the stoma site 30 days after surgery. The secondary endpoint was the 30-day SSI rate after surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 159 patients (PCD group, n = 79; PSA group, n = 80) were eligible for this study. The incidence of wound healing at the stoma site was 92.4% in the PCD group and 62.5% in the PSA group [difference (95% confidence interval - 29.9% (- 42.9 to - 16.9%)]. The 30-day SSI rate at the stoma site, as the secondary endpoint, was 8.9% in the PCD group and 5.0% in the PSA group (P = 0.35).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PCD may remain the standard procedure for stoma reversal surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Purse-string approximation; Randomized clinical trial; Stoma closure; Wound healing; Wound infection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30367238     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1729-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  31 in total

1.  Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques.

Authors:  G Lahat; H Tulchinsky; G Goldman; J M Klauzner; M Rabau
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  The "round block" purse-string suture: a simple method to close skin defects with minimal scarring.

Authors:  C Tremolada; D Blandini; M Beretta; M Mascetti
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  W S Tan; C L Tang; L Shi; K W Eu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Significance testing to establish equivalence between treatments, with special reference to data in the form of 2X2 tables.

Authors:  C W Dunnett; M Gent
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Wound infection during stoma closure.

Authors:  D J Hackam; O D Rotstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Colostomy wound closure.

Authors:  T V Berne; C N Griffith; J Hill; P LoGuidice
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1985-08

7.  Sample size requirements for evaluating a conservative therapy.

Authors:  R Makuch; R Simon
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-07

8.  Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  G G Chude; N V Rayate; V Patris; Mahim Koshariya; Rajan Jagad; J Kawamoto; N J Lygidakis
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

9.  Randomized controlled trial: comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: purse string vs direct suture.

Authors:  N Dusch; D Goranova; F Herrle; M Niedergethmann; P Kienle
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Randomized clinical trial of intestinal ostomy takedown comparing pursestring wound closure vs conventional closure to eliminate the risk of wound infection.

Authors:  Daniel Camacho-Mauries; José Luis Rodriguez-Díaz; Noel Salgado-Nesme; Quintín H González; Omar Vergara-Fernández
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  4 in total

1.  The technique for less infectious and earlier healing of stoma closure wound: negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwelling followed by primary closure.

Authors:  Yoshinori Yane; Jin-Ichi Hida; Yusuke Makutani; Hokuto Ushijima; Yasumasa Yoshioka; Masayoshi Iwamoto; Toshiaki Wada; Koji Daito; Tadao Tokoro; Kazuki Ueda; Junichiro Kawamura
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for the wound of ileostomy closure: a multicenter, phase II randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Koichiro Kojima; Mayu Goto; Yasuo Nagashima; Yoko Saito; Masaya Kawai; Shihori Takebe; Akiko Egawa; Mitsuko Tanba; Kazue Ishikawa; Hiroyoshi Matsuoka; Tadahiko Masaki; Eiji Sunami; Norihiko Ohura; Koji Teruya; Ken Eto; Keijiro Nozawa; Kazuhiro Sakamoto; Kimihiko Funahashi
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Gunsight sutures significantly reduce surgical-site infection after ileostomy reversal compared with linear sutures.

Authors:  Chuang-Kun Li; Wei-Wen Liang; Huai-Ming Wang; Wen-Tai Guo; Xiu-Sen Qin; Jie Zhao; Wen-Bin Zhou; Yang Li; Hui Wang; Rong-Kang Huang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2020-12-10

4.  Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwelling after stoma closure: a retrospective and propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Yoshinori Yane; Jin-Ichi Hida; Yasutaka Chiba; Yusuke Makutani; Hokuto Ushijima; Yasumasa Yoshioka; Masayoshi Iwamoto; Toshiaki Wada; Koji Daito; Tadao Tokoro; Kazuki Ueda; Junichiro Kawamura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.