Literature DB >> 23074555

Analysis of Cesarean Section Rate - According to Robson's 10-group Classification.

Tahira Kazmi1, Sarva Saiseema, Sultana Khan.   

Abstract

Year:  2012        PMID: 23074555      PMCID: PMC3472574          DOI: 10.5001/omj.2012.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oman Med J        ISSN: 1999-768X


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?

Authors:  M S Robson
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.237

2.  Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway.

Authors:  Toril Kolås; Dag Hofoss; Anne K Daltveit; Stein T Nilsen; Tore Henriksen; Renate Häger; Ingemar Ingemarsson; Pål Øian
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Fay Menacker; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

4.  Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms.

Authors:  J Bernardes; A Costa-Pereira; D Ayres-de-Campos; H P van Geijn; L Pereira-Leite
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.

Authors:  J van Roosmalen; C D van der Does
Journal:  Trop Geogr Med       Date:  1995

6.  Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Donal J Brennan; Michael S Robson; Martina Murphy; Colm O'Herlihy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08.

Authors:  Pisake Lumbiganon; Malinee Laopaiboon; A Metin Gülmezoglu; João Paulo Souza; Surasak Taneepanichskul; Pang Ruyan; Deepika Eranjanie Attygalle; Naveen Shrestha; Rintaro Mori; Duc Hinh Nguyen; Thi Bang Hoang; Tung Rathavy; Kang Chuyun; Kannitha Cheang; Mario Festin; Venus Udomprasertgul; Maria Julieta V Germar; Gao Yanqiu; Malabika Roy; Guillermo Carroli; Katherine Ba-Thike; Ekaterina Filatova; José Villar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparing rates of trial of labour attempts, VBAC success, and fetal and maternal complications among family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  Balbina Russillo; Maida J Sewitch; Linda Cardinal; Normand Brassard
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2008-02

10.  Cesarean section rate in Iran, multidimensional approaches for behavioral change of providers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Bahareh Yazdizadeh; Saharnaz Nedjat; Kazem Mohammad; Arash Rashidian; Nasrin Changizi; Reza Majdzadeh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  13 in total

1.  Proposing a Hybrid Model Based on Robson's Classification for Better Impact on Trends of Cesarean Deliveries.

Authors:  Punit Hans; Renu Rohatgi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-11-21

2.  Segregation of Patients for Intrapartum Monitoring, using Robson's Classification.

Authors:  Khushboo Vikram Kandhari; Rahul Vishwanath Mayekar; Archana Anilkumar Bhosale; Yogeshwar Sadashiv Nandanwar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-04-01

3.  Prevalence and predictors of elective and emergency caesarean delivery among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh: evidence from demographic and health survey, 2017-18.

Authors:  T Muhammad; Shobhit Srivastava; Pradeep Kumar; Rashmi Rashmi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Psychological Predictors of Intention to Deliver Vaginally through the Extended Parallel Process Model: A Mixed-Method Approach in Pregnant Iranian Women.

Authors:  Sepideh Hajian; Mohammad Shariati; Khadijeh Mirzaii Najmabadi; Masud Yunesian; Mohammad Esmaeel Ajami
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2013-11

5.  Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammed Walid Zimmo; Katariina Laine; Sahar Hassan; Bettina Bottcher; Erik Fosse; Hadil Ali-Masri; Kaled Zimmo; Ragnhild Sørum Falk; Marit Lieng; Åse Vikanes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in University Hospital Tuzla - According to Robson's Classification.

Authors:  Jasenko Fatusic; Igor Hudic; Zlatan Fatusic; Aida Zildzic-Moralic; Milorad Zivkovic
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2016-05-31

7.  Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Louise Fischer Christensen; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Analysis of caesarean sections using Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Olga Pijpers; Myrna de Man; Myrthe Cleveringa; Ingeborg Koopmans; Abera Kenay Tura; Tadesse Gure; Jelle Stekelenburg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The Challenges and Achievements in the Implementation of the Natural Childbirth Instruction Program: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Reza Dehnavieh; Rahil Ghorbani Nia; Zahra Nazeri
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2020-11-07

Review 10.  A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Nadia Vindevoghel; Joao Paulo Souza; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.