Literature DB >> 24223242

Psychological Predictors of Intention to Deliver Vaginally through the Extended Parallel Process Model: A Mixed-Method Approach in Pregnant Iranian Women.

Sepideh Hajian1, Mohammad Shariati, Khadijeh Mirzaii Najmabadi, Masud Yunesian, Mohammad Esmaeel Ajami.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite the fact that cesarean delivery does not offer significant health benefits for either mother or newborn, there has been a noticeable upward trend in elective cesarean births in Iran, over the last two decades. This study aims to examine whether knowledge, perception of health threats, efficacy, and personal beliefs act as psychological predictors towards the intention of women to have a normal vaginal delivery.
METHODS: The mixed-method approach was used as quantitative and qualitative design. Simultaneously, 290 pregnant women who visited prenatal clinics participated in the study. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire based on Witte's Extended Parallel Process Model, and four focus groups, respectively.
RESULTS: Women perceived lower personal risk but higher levels of efficacy. Perceived self-efficacy, severity, and response efficacy emerged as significant predictors of intention to experience vaginal birth. The participants' insufficient knowledge and misconceptions about birth methods were prevalent. Major themes were identified and divided into negative and positive beliefs about vaginal birth.
CONCLUSION: This educational model is useful for understanding women's intention to undergo a vaginal birth, especially when it is combined with a qualitative approach. Maternal care providers should acknowledge their clients' beliefs and intended childbirth methods prior to offering medical intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extended Parallel Process Model; Normal vaginal delivery; mixed methods

Year:  2013        PMID: 24223242      PMCID: PMC3815863          DOI: 10.5001/omj.2013.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oman Med J        ISSN: 1999-768X


  20 in total

1.  Predicting risk behaviors: development and validation of a diagnostic scale.

Authors:  K Witte; K A Cameron; J K McKeon; J M Berkowitz
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  1996 Oct-Dec

2.  Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Mary Barger; Howard J Cabral; Stephen R Evans; Milton Kotelchuck; Carol Simon; Judith Weiss; Linda J Heffner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.

Authors:  Denise F Polit; Cheryl Tatano Beck; Steven V Owen
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Commentary: childbirth education in iran.

Authors:  Shahnaz Torkzahrani
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2008

5.  Rise in cesarean section rate over a 30-year period in a public hospital in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Badakhsh; Mahsan Seifoddin; Nahid Khodakarami; Roya Gholami; Sedigheh Moghimi
Journal:  Arch Iran Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.354

6.  Ambivalence, communication and past use: understanding what influences women's intentions to use contraceptives.

Authors:  Shelly Campo; Natoshia M Askelson; Erica L Spies; Mary Losch
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Man Wah Pang; Tse Ngong Leung; Tze Kin Lau; Tony Kwok Hang Chung
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  Community factors affecting rising caesarean section rates in developing countries: an analysis of six countries.

Authors:  Tiziana Leone; Sabu S Padmadas; Zoë Matthews
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Caesarean delivery in south-western Iran: trends and determinants in a community-based survey.

Authors:  Najmeh Maharlouei; Mansoureh Moalaee; Saeed Ajdari; Maasoumeh Zarei; Kamran B Lankarani
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 1.927

View more
  8 in total

1.  Modeling the intention to choose natural vaginal delivery: using reasoned action and social cognitive theories.

Authors:  Safieh Kanani; Hamid Allahverdipour; Mohammad AsghariJafarabadi
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2015-03-29

2.  Childbirth Fear and Associated Factors in a Sample of Pregnant Iranian Women.

Authors:  Forough Mortazavi; Jila Agah
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2018-11

3.  Prediction of Adequate Prenatal Care Utilization Based on the Extended Parallel Process Model.

Authors:  Sepideh Hajian; Fatemeh Imani; Hedyeh Riazi; Fatemeh Salmani
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2017-10

4.  Pregnant women's preferences for mode of delivery questionnaire: Psychometric properties.

Authors:  Fereshteh Zamani-Alavijeh; Parvin Shahry; Maryam Kalhori; Marzieh Araban
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2017-04-19

5.  Persuading Iranian Women toward Normal Vaginal Delivery: Using Pictorial Perception of the Labour Process.

Authors:  Safieh Kananikandeh
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-06

6.  Effect of "motivational interviewing" and "information, motivation, and behavioral skills" counseling interventions on choosing the mode of delivery in pregnant women: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mahboubeh Shirzad; Elham Shakibazadeh; Abbas Rahimi Foroushani; Mehrandokht Abedini; Hamid Poursharifi; Sohrab Babaei
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in Iran: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Mahboubeh Shirzad; Elham Shakibazadeh; Khadijeh Hajimiri; Ana Pilar Betran; Shayesteh Jahanfar; Meghan A Bohren; Newton Opiyo; Qian Long; Carol Kingdon; Mercedes Colomar; Mehrandokht Abedini
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation.

Authors:  Seyed Abolhassan Naghibi; Maryam Khazaee-Pool; Mahmood Moosazadeh
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.