Literature DB >> 23073818

Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of instrumented knee laxity tests.

Carola F van Eck1, Miette Loopik, Michel P van den Bekerom, Freddie H Fu, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this meta-analysis were to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the KT 1000 Arthrometer, Stryker Knee Laxity Tester and Genucom Knee Analysis System for ACL rupture. It was hypothesized that the KT 1000 test is the most sensitive and specific. Secondly, it was hypothesized that the sensitivity and specificity of the KT 1000 arthrometer increase when the amount of Newton force is increased.
METHODS: An electronic database search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE. All cross-sectional and cohort studies comparing one or more instrumented examination tests for diagnosing acute complete ACL rupture in living human subjects to an accepted reference standard such as arthroscopy, arthrotomy and MRI were included.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the KT 1000 Arthrometer with 69 N was 0.54. With 89 N, the sensitivity was 0.78 and the specificity 0.92, and with maximum manual force, the sensitivity was 0.93 and the specificity 0.93. For the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester, the sensitivity was 0.82 and the specificity 0.90. And for the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the sensitivity was 0.74 and the specificity 0.82.
CONCLUSION: The KT Arthrometer performed with maximum manual force has the highest sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value for diagnosing ACL rupture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis, level I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23073818     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2246-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  40 in total

1.  Intrarater reliability of selected clinical outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J A Brosky; A J Nitz; T R Malone; D N Caborn; M K Rayens
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Jeroen G Lijmer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Laxity measurements using stress radiography to assess anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  J Beldame; S Bertiaux; X Roussignol; B Lefebvre; J-M Adam; F Mouilhade; F Dujardin
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Instrumented evaluation of knee laxity: a comparison of five arthrometers.

Authors:  A F Anderson; R B Snyder; C F Federspiel; A B Lipscomb
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  Current concepts in instrumented knee-laxity testing.

Authors:  Luke Pugh; Randy Mascarenhas; Shalinder Arneja; Patrick Y K Chin; Jordan M Leith
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Reliability and validity of judgments of the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee using the Lachman's test.

Authors:  J M Cooperman; D L Riddle; J M Rothstein
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1990-04

7.  The rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000.

Authors:  A Ganko; L Engebretsen; H Ozer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Instrumented examination of knee laxity in patients with anterior cruciate deficiency: a comparison of the KT-2000, Knee Signature System, and Genucom.

Authors:  W S Queale; L Snyder-Mackler; K A Handling; J G Richards
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Clinically assessed knee joint laxity as a predictor for reconstruction after an anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study of 100 patients treated with activity modification and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Ioannis Kostogiannis; Eva Ageberg; Paul Neuman; Leif E Dahlberg; Thomas Fridén; Harald Roos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Anterior cruciate ligament tear: reliability of MR imaging to predict stability after conservative treatment.

Authors:  Hye Won Chung; Jin Hwan Ahn; Joong Mo Ahn; Young Cheol Yoon; Hyun Pyo Hong; So Young Yoo; Seonwoo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  [Ligamentous knee injuries in children and adolescents].

Authors:  T C Drenck; R Akoto; N M Meenen; M Heitmann; A Preiss; K- H Frosch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Daniel Theisen; Romain Seil
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

Review 3.  Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging.

Authors:  Eric M Rohman; Jeffrey A Macalena
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

4.  Combined anterior and rotational laxity measurements allow characterizing personal knee laxity profiles in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Romain Seil; Tim Meyer; Hélène Agostinis; Daniel Theisen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  A non-invasive biomechanical device to quantify knee rotational laxity: Verification of the device in human cadaveric specimens.

Authors:  Jeffrey Chun-Yin Lee; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Mak-Ham Lam; Aaron See-Long Hung; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Wood Yee Chan; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2018-12-06

6.  Prognostic Factors for Patient-Reported Outcomes at 32 to 37 Years After Surgical or Nonsurgical Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Stephanie Filbay; Christer Andersson; Håkan Gauffin; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-11

7.  Association between generalized joint laxity and knee joint movement in female university students.

Authors:  Shinichiro Oka; Shiori Kawano; Takeyoshi Shimoda; Nozomi Hamachi; Tsubasa Mitsutake
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2022-02-23

8.  A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Authors:  Michael J Anderson; William M Browning; Christopher E Urband; Melissa A Kluczynski; Leslie J Bisson
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-03-15

9.  Test-retest reliability of repeated knee laxity measurements in the acute phase following a knee trauma using a Rolimeter.

Authors:  Daniel Ericsson; Anna Hafsteinsson Östenberg; Erik Andersson; Marie Alricsson
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2017-10-30

10.  Assessment of knee laxity using a robotic testing device: a comparison to the manual clinical knee examination.

Authors:  T P Branch; S K Stinton; R Siebold; H I Freedberg; C A Jacobs; W C Hutton
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.