Literature DB >> 18544668

Clinically assessed knee joint laxity as a predictor for reconstruction after an anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study of 100 patients treated with activity modification and rehabilitation.

Ioannis Kostogiannis1, Eva Ageberg, Paul Neuman, Leif E Dahlberg, Thomas Fridén, Harald Roos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The association of early knee joint laxity with the need for later reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament has not been extensively studied. HYPOTHESIS: The grade of knee laxity can be used as an early predictor of the need for later reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with an acute arthroscopically verified total anterior cruciate ligament rupture were followed prospectively for 15 years. Lachman and pivot-shift tests were performed with the patient under general anesthesia before arthroscopy. After 3 months, the tests were repeated in an ordinary clinical setting. All patients underwent rehabilitation as the first choice of treatment. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed only in cases of significant reinjuries (n = 16) or reparable meniscal lesions (n = 6) at a mean of 4 years after injury (range, 4 months-11 years). After 15 years, 94 patients were available for follow-up.
RESULTS: Of the later reconstructed patients (n = 18), 82% had a high-grade Lachman test under anesthesia compared with 63% of the nonreconstructed patients (n = 45; P = .048). At 3 months, 44% of the nonreconstructed patients (n = 32) had a high-grade Lachman test compared with 82% of the reconstructed patients (n = 18; P = .007). Twenty-five patients displayed a normal pivot-shift test at 3 months, of whom 1 underwent later reconstruction (P = .009). A high-grade pivot-shift test at 3 months was associated with an 11.4 relative risk for reconstruction.
CONCLUSION: A positive pivot-shift test at 3 months after injury in an awake patient is the strongest predictor for the future need for reconstruction. Furthermore, a normal pivot-shift test at 3 months indicates a low risk for reconstruction and is characteristic for copers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18544668     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508317717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  12 in total

Review 1.  A 'plane' explanation of anterior cruciate ligament injury mechanisms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carmen E Quatman; Catherine C Quatman-Yates; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of instrumented knee laxity tests.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Miette Loopik; Michel P van den Bekerom; Freddie H Fu; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Diagnostics and therapy].

Authors:  W Teske; A Anastisiadis; T Lichtinger; C von Schulze Pellengahr; L V von Engelhardt; T Theodoridis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The influence of posterior-inferior tibial slope in ACL injury.

Authors:  Ioannis Kostogiannis; Per Swärd; Paul Neuman; Thomas Fridén; Harald Roos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Anterior cruciate ligament tears: conservative or surgical treatment? A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Philippe Delincé; Dior Ghafil
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Nonoperative treatment for anterior cruciate ligament injury in recreational alpine skiers.

Authors:  Iftach Hetsroni; Demetris Delos; Greg Fives; Brian W Boyle; Kaitlyn Lillemoe; Robert G Marx
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Can magnetic resonance imaging findings predict the degree of knee joint laxity in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Moon Jong Chang; Chong Bum Chang; Ja-Young Choi; Min Soo Je; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Is anterior cruciate ligament surgery technique important in rehabilitation and activity scores?

Authors:  Bekir Eray Kilinc; Adnan Kara; Haluk Celik; Yunus Oc; Savas Camur
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 9.  The anterior cruciate ligament injury controversy: is "valgus collapse" a sex-specific mechanism?

Authors:  C E Quatman; T E Hewett
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 10.  Update on rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  John Nyland; Emily Brand; Brent Fisher
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2010-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.