Literature DB >> 20851645

The learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy: definable, short, and safe.

Jonathan Hernandez1, Sharona Ross, Connor Morton, Kellie McFarlin, Sujat Dahal, Farhaad Golkar, Michael Albrink, Alexander Rosemurgy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The applications of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery, including cholecystectomy, are occurring quickly, although little is generally known about issues associated with the learning curve of this new technique including operative time, conversion rates, and safety. STUDY
DESIGN: We prospectively followed all patients undergoing LESS cholecystectomy, and compared operations undertaken at our institutions in cohorts of 25 patients with respect to operative times, conversion rates, and complications.
RESULTS: One-hundred fifty patients of mean age 46 years underwent LESS cholecystectomy. No significant differences in operative times were demonstrable between any of the 25-patient cohorts operated on at our institution. A significant reduction in operative times (p < 0.001) after completion of 75 LESS procedures was, however, identified with the experience of a single surgeon. No significant reduction in the number of procedures requiring an additional trocar(s) or conversion to open operations was observed after completion of 25 LESS cholecystectomies. Complication rates were low, and not significantly different between any 25-patient cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: For surgeons proficient with multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the learning curve for LESS cholecystectomy begins near proficiency. Operative complications and conversions were infrequent and unchanged across successive 25-patient cohorts, and were similar to those reported for multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20851645     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  36 in total

1.  [Laparoscopic single port surgery : Is structured training necessary?].

Authors:  K Krajinovic; C T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Does the cost of robotic cholecystectomy translate to a financial burden?

Authors:  Alexander Rosemurgy; Carrie Ryan; Richard Klein; Prashant Sukharamwala; Thomas Wood; Sharona Ross
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Emerging Techniques in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Pros and Cons.

Authors:  P Marco Fisichella; Steven R DeMeester; Eric Hungness; Silvana Perretta; Nathaniel J Soper; Alexander Rosemurgy; Alfonso Torquati; Ajit K Sachdeva; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Nissen Fundoplication: How We Do It.

Authors:  Alexander S Rosemurgy; Darrell Downs; Forat Swaid; Sharona B Ross
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Consensus statement of the consortium for LESS cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sharona Ross; Alexander Rosemurgy; Michael Albrink; Edward Choung; Giovanni Dapri; Scott Gallagher; Jonathan Hernandez; Santiago Horgan; William Kelley; Michael Kia; Jeffrey Marks; Jose Martinez; Yoav Mintz; Dmitry Oleynikov; Aurora Pryor; David Rattner; Homero Rivas; Kurt Roberts; Eugene Rubach; Steven Schwaitzberg; Lee Swanstrom; John Sweeney; Erik Wilson; Harry Zemon; Natan Zundel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) vs. conventional laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD: is there a difference?

Authors:  Sharona Ross; Andy Roddenbery; Kenneth Luberice; Harold Paul; Thomas Farrior; Michelle Vice; Krishen Patel; Alexander Rosemurgy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Single-incision vs three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated and uncomplicated acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Shu-Hung Chuang; Pai-Hsi Chen; Chih-Ming Chang; Chih-Sheng Lin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy with epidural vs. general anesthesia.

Authors:  Sharona B Ross; Devanand Mangar; Rachel Karlnoski; Enrico Camporesi; Katheryne Downes; Kenneth Luberice; Krista Haines; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional four-port cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Brittney L Culp; Veronica E Cedillo; David T Arnold
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2012-10

Review 10.  Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Mikael H Sodergren; Pritam Singh; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Parakseva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.