Literature DB >> 22354488

Novice surgeons versus experienced surgeons in laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery: a comparison of performances in a surgical simulator.

Leonidas Alevizos1, Willem Brinkman, Abe Fingerhut, Jack Jakimowicz, Emmanuel Leandros.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: During the past years, there has been increasing interest in simulation-based training of technical skills especially in laparoscopy. The purpose of this study was to compare the performances of novice and experienced laparoscopic surgeons on a LESS simulator.
METHODS: The study recruited 20 surgeons classified into two groups: group NS consisted of ten residents without any laparoscopic experience, and group ES consisted of ten surgeons with experience in conventional laparoscopy (performed >90 laparoscopic cholecystectomies) but without any experience in LESS surgery. Both groups completed a mini-trainee course that included four repetitions of a standardized task of circle pattern cutting (CIRCLE). Time, path length, and economy of movement were measured and compared.
RESULTS: Group ES presented significantly better time scores than group NS in all four repetitions. Economy of movement did not differ significantly between the two groups, whereas path length was shorter for beginners at the forth effort. Moreover, group ES failed to improve path length and economy of movement scores, whereas group NS improved their performance significantly in these parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: It seems that previous laparoscopic experience in conventional laparoscopy may not necessarily be an advantage in all parameters of LESS surgery and the learning process can be longer than expected even for experienced surgeons.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22354488     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1487-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.

Authors:  A G Pedersen; O B Petersen; P Wara; H Rønning; N Qvist; S Laurberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator.

Authors:  Byron F Santos; Daniel Enter; Nathaniel J Soper; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Single-incision laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Alan A Saber; Tarek H El-Ghazaly; Aditya V Dewoolkar
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  E Matt Ritter; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for a colon mass.

Authors:  Aziz M Merchant; Edward Lin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Single incision laparoscopic splenectomy: the first two cases.

Authors:  Umut Barbaros; Ahmet Dinççağ
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  A method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  J Y Chung; J M Sackier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Laparoscopic single-site surgery for placement of an adjustable gastric band: initial experience.

Authors:  J Teixeira; K McGill; S Binenbaum; G Forrester
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): the first UK experience.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Sanjay Purkayastha; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 2.058

View more
  6 in total

1.  Acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skills is different comparing conventional laparoscopic and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a single-centre, prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Scott Michael Ellis; Martin Varley; Stuart Howell; Markus Trochsler; Guy Maddern; Peter Hewett; Tina Runge; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Prospective randomized assessment of acquisition and retention of SILS skills after simulation training.

Authors:  Martin Varley; Ryan Choi; Kean Kuan; Neil Bhardwaj; Markus Trochsler; Guy Maddern; Peter Hewett; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.

Authors:  Vlad I Tica; Andrei A Tica; Rudy L De Wilde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Mikael H Sodergren; Pritam Singh; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Parakseva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Task performance in standard laparoscopy in comparison with single-incision laparoscopy in a modified skills trainer.

Authors:  Andrew S Wright; Saurabh Khandelwal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Learning curve of surgical novices using the single-port platform SymphonX: minimizing OR trauma to only one 15-mm incision.

Authors:  Rabi R Datta; Sebastian Schönhage; Thomas Dratsch; Justus Toader; Dolores T Müller; Roger Wahba; Robert Kleinert; Michael Thomas; Georg Dieplinger; Dirk L Stippel; Christiane J Bruns; Hans F Fuchs
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.