Literature DB >> 23072814

Long-term oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing management using oral progestin for young women with endometrial cancer (KGOG 2002).

Jeong-Yeol Park1, Dae-Yeon Kim, Jong-Hyeok Kim, Yong-Man Kim, Kyu-Rae Kim, Young-Tak Kim, Seok Ju Seong, Tae-Jin Kim, Jae Weon Kim, Seok Mo Kim, Duk-Soo Bae, Joo-Hyun Nam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the long-term oncologic outcomes of a fertility-sparing management using oral progestin in young women with endometrial cancer.
METHODS: We analysed 148 patients (age≤40 years) with stage IA, grade 1, endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus who underwent fertility-sparing management using daily oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) or megestrol acetate (MA).
RESULTS: 115 (77.7%) showed complete response (CR) to progestin treatment, and 35 (30.4%) of them experienced recurrence after median follow-up time of 66 months. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58.5-76.9%). However, 33 patients (22.3%) who failed to achieve CR underwent definitive surgical management, and no one had recurrence after median follow-up time of 41 months. During progestin treatment and at the time of recurrence, no patient showed clinical progression of disease over stage IA. Body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m(2) was the only significant factor associated with a failure to achieve CR (odds ratio [OR], 3.00; 95% CI, 1.35-6.66; P=0.007). Upon multivariate analysis, BMI≥25 kg/m(2) (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.06-4.31; P=0.033) was significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrence and the use of MPA (compared to MA) (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.88; P=0.021), maintenance treatment (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05-0.94; P=0.042) and pregnancy (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.56; P=0.001) were significantly associated with a lower risk of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Fertility-sparing management was highly effective and safe. BMI<25 kg/m(2), MPA (compared to MA), maintenance treatment and pregnancy were associated with higher possibility of long-term success.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23072814     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  41 in total

Review 1.  Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: How MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management.

Authors:  Sinead H McEvoy; Stephanie Nougaret; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Christine O Menias; Fuki Shitano; Shinya Fujii; Ramon E Sosa; Joanna G Escalon; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  Progestins in the fertility-sparing treatment and retreatment of patients with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-02-11

Review 3.  Current state of fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult patients with gynecological cancer.

Authors:  Tatsuru Ohara; Shiho Kuji; Tomo Takenaga; Haruka Imai; Hiraku Endo; Ryo Kanamori; Jun Takeuchi; Yuko Nagasawa; Noriyuki Yokomichi; Haruhiro Kondo; Imari Deura; Akiko Tozawa; Nao Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Analysis of Factors Associated With Recurrence of Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma and Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia in Infertile Women After In Vitro Fertilization Treatment.

Authors:  Yaxing Guo; Xuan Zong; Hongzhen Li; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 5.  Fertility sparing surgery for stage IA type I and G2 endometrial cancer in reproductive-aged patients: evidence-based approach and future perspectives.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Diego Rossetti; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi; Antonio Simone Laganà
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-02-10

6.  Route-specific association of progestin therapy and concurrent metformin use in obese women with complex atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Rachel S Mandelbaum; Marcia Ciccone; Mahdi Khoshchehreh; Heena Pursuwani; Elise B Morocco; Shinya Matsuzaki; Christina E Dancz; Begum Ozel; Richard J Paulson; Lynda Roman
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 7.  The Prediction of Recurrence in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Is It Time for a Paradigm Shift in Adjuvant Therapy?

Authors:  Mohamed Laban; Seif Tarek El-Swaify; Sara H Ali; Mazen A Refaat; Mohamed Sabbour; Nourhan Farrag; Alaa Sayed Hassanin
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.060

8.  Characteristics of progestin-insensitive early stage endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia patients receiving second-line fertility-sparing treatment.

Authors:  Shuang Zhou; Zhiying Xu; Bingyi Yang; Jun Guan; Weiwei Shan; Yue Shi; Xiaojun Chen
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 9.  Preserving fertility in young patients with endometrial cancer: current perspectives.

Authors:  Eleftheria Kalogera; Sean C Dowdy; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-07-29

Review 10.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early-Stage Cervical, Ovarian, and Endometrial Malignancies.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Terri Woodard; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.