Literature DB >> 34779961

Current state of fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult patients with gynecological cancer.

Tatsuru Ohara1, Shiho Kuji1, Tomo Takenaga1, Haruka Imai1, Hiraku Endo1, Ryo Kanamori1, Jun Takeuchi1, Yuko Nagasawa1, Noriyuki Yokomichi1, Haruhiro Kondo1, Imari Deura1, Akiko Tozawa1, Nao Suzuki2.   

Abstract

Although the incidence of the various gynecological cancers has been increasing in recent years, long-term survival is now possible for many patients thanks to advances in multimodality treatment. When treating gynecological cancer in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients who desire future pregnancy, it is necessary to preserve the reproductive organs and their function to prevent loss of fertility. However, because treatment targets these organs, in the large majority of cases, patients must have these organs removed. In the subfield of oncofertility, treatment of the underlying disease takes priority, and the main principle is preventing delay in treatment. Close cooperation between obstetricians and gynecologists involved in reproductive medicine and oncologists involved in cancer treatment is necessary. In addition, it is important that clinicians work closely not only with other specialists but also with such medical professionals as nurses and counselors so that cancer patients of the AYA generation can be provided the support they need to fight their cancer with hope. Herein, we describe the current status of fertility-sparing therapy for AYA patients with gynecological cancer (cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, or ovarian cancer). In addition, we explain points to keep in mind during a patient's pregnancy after fertility preservation, the latest findings on assisted reproductive technology, and the challenges and prospects of fertility preservation therapy for patients with gynecologic cancer.
© 2021. Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent and young adult generation; Fertility preservation; Fertility-sparing surgery; Gynecological cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34779961     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-02063-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  63 in total

1.  Endocervical curettage at conization to predict residual cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Jayanthi S Lea; Christine H Shin; Ellen E Sheets; Robert L Coleman; Paola A Gehrig; Linda R Duska; David S Miller; John O Schorge
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kyrgiou; G Koliopoulos; P Martin-Hirsch; M Arbyn; W Prendiville; E Paraskevaidis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2-IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome.

Authors:  Mignon Dingena Johanna Maria van Gent; Lukas Wesley van den Haak; Katja Nicolien Gaarenstroom; Alexander A W Peters; Mariette Inie Elisabeth van Poelgeest; Johanes Baptist Maria Zacharias Trimbos; Cor Doede de Kroon
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Cervical cancer: epidemiology, prevention and the role of human papillomavirus infection.

Authors:  E L Franco; E Duarte-Franco; A Ferenczy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Long-term outcomes after fertility-sparing laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in young women with early-stage cervical cancer: an Asan Gynecologic Cancer Group (AGCG) study.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Won Deok Joo; Suk-Joon Chang; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Roy; M Plante
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Obstetric outcomes of patients undergoing total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Keiko Ebisawa; Mizuki Takano; Mika Fukuda; Kazuko Fujiwara; Tomonori Hada; Yoshiaki Ota; Shozo Kurotsuchi; Hiroyuki Kanao; Masaaki Andou
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Murat Api; Aysen Boza; Mehmet Ceyhan
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.137

9.  Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  John P Diaz; Yukio Sonoda; Mario M Leitao; Oliver Zivanovic; Carol L Brown; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Arbyn; M Kyrgiou; C Simoens; A O Raifu; G Koliopoulos; P Martin-Hirsch; W Prendiville; E Paraskevaidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  Trends in Pregnancy-Associated Cervical Cancer in Japan between 2012 and 2017: A Multicenter Survey.

Authors:  Sayako Enomoto; Kosuke Yoshihara; Eiji Kondo; Akiko Iwata; Mamoru Tanaka; Tsutomu Tabata; Yoshiki Kudo; Eiji Kondoh; Masaki Mandai; Takashi Sugiyama; Aikou Okamoto; Tsuyoshi Saito; Takayuki Enomoto; Tomoaki Ikeda
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.575

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.