Literature DB >> 32376736

Route-specific association of progestin therapy and concurrent metformin use in obese women with complex atypical hyperplasia.

Koji Matsuo1,2, Rachel S Mandelbaum3, Marcia Ciccone3,2, Mahdi Khoshchehreh3, Heena Pursuwani3, Elise B Morocco3, Shinya Matsuzaki3, Christina E Dancz3, Begum Ozel3, Richard J Paulson3, Lynda Roman3,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have suggested that metformin use may enhance the therapeutic effect of progestin therapy for endometrial hyperplasia or malignancy. However, it is not known how the impact of concurrent metformin may be altered by route of progestin therapy, either locally via an intrauterine device or systemically. This study examined the effectiveness of concurrent metformin use and progestin therapy for women with complex atypical hyperplasia stratified by progestin route (systemic vs local).
METHODS: This single-institution retrospective study examined consecutive women with complex atypical hyperplasia who received progestin therapy from 2003 to 2018. Time-dependent analyses for complete response rate were performed comparing concurrent metformin users versus non-users in the oral progestin group and in the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device group.
RESULTS: Across the study cohort (n=245), there were 137 (55.9%) women who responded to progestin therapy. In the oral progestin group (n=176), the median age and body mass index were 36 years and 37.7 kg/m2, respectively. 36 (20.5%) of women on oral progestins also took metformin. After controlling for diabetes status, women taking both oral progestins and metformin had a complete response rate similar to those not taking metformin (6 month cumulative rates, 23.1% vs 27.8%, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.36 to 1.41). In the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device group (n=69), the median age and body mass index were 35 years and 39.9 kg/m2, respectively. There were 15 (21.7%) women who took metformin in addition to the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. After controlling for diabetes status, women who had the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and took metformin had a significantly higher complete response rate compared with those not taking metformin (6 month cumulative rates, 86.7% vs 58.9%, aHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.89).
CONCLUSION: In a predominantly obese population, concurrent metformin may possibly offer treatment benefit when used with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. © IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endometrial hyperplasia

Year:  2020        PMID: 32376736      PMCID: PMC7521080          DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  26 in total

1.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-20

2.  Expression of organic cation transporter SLC22A16 in human endometria.

Authors:  Naoko Sato; Kiyoshi Ito; Toru Onogawa; Jun-Ichi Akahira; Michiaki Unno; Takaaki Abe; Hitoshi Niikura; Nobuo Yaegashi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 3.  Problems in the differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma.

Authors:  S G Silverberg
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Treatment of Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer and Complex Atypical Hyperplasia With the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device.

Authors:  Navdeep Pal; Russell R Broaddus; Diana L Urbauer; Nyla Balakrishnan; Andrea Milbourne; Kathleen M Schmeler; Larissa A Meyer; Pamela T Soliman; Karen H Lu; Pedro T Ramirez; Lois Ramondetta; Diane C Bodurka; Shannon N Westin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Long-term oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing management using oral progestin for young women with endometrial cancer (KGOG 2002).

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Kyu-Rae Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Seok Ju Seong; Tae-Jin Kim; Jae Weon Kim; Seok Mo Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of "untreated" hyperplasia in 170 patients.

Authors:  R J Kurman; P F Kaminski; H J Norris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Metformin is a potent inhibitor of endometrial cancer cell proliferation--implications for a novel treatment strategy.

Authors:  Leigh A Cantrell; Chunxiao Zhou; Alberto Mendivil; Kimberly M Malloy; Paola A Gehrig; Victoria L Bae-Jump
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Metformin for endometrial hyperplasia.

Authors:  Naomi S Clement; Thomas Rw Oliver; Hunain Shiwani; Juliane Rf Sanner; Caroline A Mulvaney; William Atiomo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-27

9.  Effect of oral versus intrauterine progestins on weight in women undergoing fertility preserving therapy for complex atypical hyperplasia or endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Diana Cholakian; Kari Hacker; Amanda N Fader; Paola A Gehrig; Edward J Tanner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Metformin Irrespective of Diabetes Status.

Authors:  Amy R Cameron; Vicky L Morrison; Daniel Levin; Mohapradeep Mohan; Calum Forteath; Craig Beall; Alison D McNeilly; David J K Balfour; Terhi Savinko; Aaron K F Wong; Benoit Viollet; Kei Sakamoto; Susanna C Fagerholm; Marc Foretz; Chim C Lang; Graham Rena
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 17.367

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Perspectives of Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jure Knez; Leyla Al Mahdawi; Iztok Takač; Monika Sobočan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.