Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Variability of the influence of a visual task on the active micromechanical properties of the cochlea.

Literature DB >> 2306619

Variability of the influence of a visual task on the active micromechanical properties of the cochlea.

P Froehlich¹, L Collet, J M Chanal, A Morgon.

Abstract

The effect of a visual task on the active micromechanical properties of the cochlea studied by the evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) has been the subject of only one published study (Brain Research, 44 (1988) 380-383). In order to examine the reliability of this effect, a similar study has been run on 16 subjects. A significant decrease in EOAEs during a visual task was obtained for 3 subjects. The two subjects whose decrease was the most significant were tested again one month later and the same effect was found. This striking interindividual variability is discussed in terms of olivo-cochlear neuronal excitability.

Mesh：

Year: 1990 PMID： 2306619 DOI： 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90408-4

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Res ISSN： 0006-8993 Impact factor: 3.252

Keyword Cloud
Cited

11 in total

1. Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Authors: Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 1.840

2. No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors: Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 1.840

3. Examining replicability of an otoacoustic measure of cochlear function during selective attention.

Authors: Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 1.840

4. Diffusion tensor imaging reveals white matter microstructure correlations with auditory processing ability.

Authors: Vincent J Schmithorst; Scott K Holland; Elena Plante
Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2011 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5. Efferent Inhibition of the Cochlea.

Authors: Paul Albert Fuchs; Amanda M Lauer
Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 6.915

10. Auditory Attention Reduced Ear-Canal Noise in Humans by Reducing Subject Motion, Not by Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Inhibition: Implications for Measuring Otoacoustic Emissions During a Behavioral Task.

Authors: Nikolas A Francis; Wei Zhao; John J Guinan
Journal: Front Syst Neurosci Date: 2018-09-13

Variability of the influence of a visual task on the active micromechanical properties of the cochlea.

1. Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

2. No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

3. Examining replicability of an otoacoustic measure of cochlear function during selective attention.

4. Diffusion tensor imaging reveals white matter microstructure correlations with auditory processing ability.

Review 5. Efferent Inhibition of the Cochlea.

6. Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. I: auditory attention.

7. Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. II: visual attention.

8. Auditory cortex basal activity modulates cochlear responses in chinchillas.

9. Heightened visual attention does not affect inner ear function as measured by otoacoustic emissions.

10. Auditory Attention Reduced Ear-Canal Noise in Humans by Reducing Subject Motion, Not by Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Inhibition: Implications for Measuring Otoacoustic Emissions During a Behavioral Task.