OBJECTIVES: To compare native aortic (AV) and mitral valve (MV) image quality on limited-dose retrospectively ECG-gated CTA of the thoracoabdominal aorta reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection (FBP). METHODS: Fifty patients underwent routine care retrospectively ECG-gated thoracoabdominal limited-dose 256-slice CTA. At 30 % (systole) and 75 % (diastole) of the R-R interval AV and MV were reconstructed using FBP and IR. Objective image quality [density and noise (SD of density measurement)] was measured. Two independent observers scored subjective valve image quality using four-point Likert scales. RESULTS: IR significantly decreased image noise, but did not alter the aorta and interventricular septum density. Interobserver variability was moderate to good. Valve image quality was scored at least moderate in most cases. IR scored one or two Likert scale points higher than FBP in 10 (first observer) and 27 (second observer) scores. Conversely, IR scored one Likert scale point lower than FBP in 1 (first observer) and 4 (second observer) scores. CONCLUSIONS: Limited-dose retrospectively ECG-gated thoracoabdominal CTA enables moderate to excellent evaluation of AV and MV in most patients, in addition to the primary diagnostic question. Image quality is further improved by IR.
OBJECTIVES: To compare native aortic (AV) and mitral valve (MV) image quality on limited-dose retrospectively ECG-gated CTA of the thoracoabdominal aorta reconstructed with iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection (FBP). METHODS: Fifty patients underwent routine care retrospectively ECG-gated thoracoabdominal limited-dose 256-slice CTA. At 30 % (systole) and 75 % (diastole) of the R-R interval AV and MV were reconstructed using FBP and IR. Objective image quality [density and noise (SD of density measurement)] was measured. Two independent observers scored subjective valve image quality using four-point Likert scales. RESULTS: IR significantly decreased image noise, but did not alter the aorta and interventricular septum density. Interobserver variability was moderate to good. Valve image quality was scored at least moderate in most cases. IR scored one or two Likert scale points higher than FBP in 10 (first observer) and 27 (second observer) scores. Conversely, IR scored one Likert scale point lower than FBP in 1 (first observer) and 4 (second observer) scores. CONCLUSIONS: Limited-dose retrospectively ECG-gated thoracoabdominal CTA enables moderate to excellent evaluation of AV and MV in most patients, in addition to the primary diagnostic question. Image quality is further improved by IR.
Authors: Peter B Noël; Alexander A Fingerle; Bernhard Renger; Daniela Münzel; Ernst J Rummeny; Martin Dobritz Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Harald Seifarth; Rainer Raupach; Stefan Schaller; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Thomas Flohr; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach; David Maintz Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-02-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Alec Vahanian; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen Bax; Eric Butchart; Robert Dion; Gerasimos Filippatos; Frank Flachskampf; Roger Hall; Bernard Iung; Jaroslaw Kasprzak; Patrick Nataf; Pilar Tornos; Lucia Torracca; Arnold Wenink Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-01-26 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: R P J Budde; F Huo; M J M Cramer; P A F M Doevendans; M L Bots; F L Moll; M Prokop Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2010-04-27 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Robert Goetti; Stephan Baumüller; Gudrun Feuchtner; Paul Stolzmann; Christoph Karlo; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Linda M de Heer; Jesse Habets; Steven A J Chamuleau; Willem P Th M Mali; Lex A van Herwerden; Jolanda Kluin; Ricardo P J Budde Journal: Cardiol Rev Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.644
Authors: Guido H W van Bogerijen; Jip L Tolenaar; Michele Conti; Ferdinando Auricchio; Francesco Secchi; Francesco Sardanelli; Frans L Moll; Joost A van Herwaarden; Vincenzo Rampoldi; Santi Trimarchi Journal: Aorta (Stamford) Date: 2013-08-01
Authors: L Schimmöller; R S Lanzman; P Heusch; S Dietrich; F Miese; J Aissa; T A Heusner; G Antoch; P Kröpil Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Guido H W van Bogerijen; Joost A van Herwaarden; Michele Conti; Ferdinando Auricchio; Vincenzo Rampoldi; Santi Trimarchi; Frans L Moll Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2014-05
Authors: Dominika Suchá; Martin J Willemink; Pim A de Jong; Arnold M R Schilham; Tim Leiner; Petr Symersky; Ricardo P J Budde Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Kurt Schultz; Elizabeth George; Katherine M Mullen; Michael L Steigner; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Ericka M Bueno; Bohdan Pomahac; Frank J Rybicki; Kanako K Kumamaru Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Astrid Ellen Grams; Tanja Djurdjevic; Rafael Rehwald; Thomas Schiestl; Florian Dazinger; Ruth Steiger; Michael Knoflach; Elke Ruth Gizewski; Bernhard Glodny Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 5.315