BACKGROUND: Ascertainment of potential subjects has been a longstanding problem in clinical research. Various methods have been proposed, including using data in electronic health records. However, these methods typically suffer from scaling effects-some methods work well for large cohorts; others work for small cohorts only. OBJECTIVE: We propose a method that provides a simple identification of pre-research cohorts and relies on data available in most states in the USA: merged public health data sources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Utah Population Database Limited query tool allows users to build complex queries that may span several types of health records, such as cancer registries, inpatient hospital discharges, and death certificates; in addition, these can be combined with family history information. The architectural approach incorporates several coding systems for medical information. It provides a front-end graphical user interface and enables researchers to build and run queries and view aggregate results. Multiple strategies have been incorporated to maintain confidentiality. RESULTS: This tool was rapidly adopted; since its release, 241 users representing a wide range of disciplines from 17 institutions have signed the user agreement and used the query tool. Three examples are discussed: pregnancy complications co-occurring with cardiovascular disease; spondyloarthritis; and breast cancer. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This query tool was designed to provide results as pre-research so that institutional review board approval would not be required. This architecture uses well-described technologies that should be within the reach of most institutions.
BACKGROUND: Ascertainment of potential subjects has been a longstanding problem in clinical research. Various methods have been proposed, including using data in electronic health records. However, these methods typically suffer from scaling effects-some methods work well for large cohorts; others work for small cohorts only. OBJECTIVE: We propose a method that provides a simple identification of pre-research cohorts and relies on data available in most states in the USA: merged public health data sources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Utah Population Database Limited query tool allows users to build complex queries that may span several types of health records, such as cancer registries, inpatient hospital discharges, and death certificates; in addition, these can be combined with family history information. The architectural approach incorporates several coding systems for medical information. It provides a front-end graphical user interface and enables researchers to build and run queries and view aggregate results. Multiple strategies have been incorporated to maintain confidentiality. RESULTS: This tool was rapidly adopted; since its release, 241 users representing a wide range of disciplines from 17 institutions have signed the user agreement and used the query tool. Three examples are discussed: pregnancy complications co-occurring with cardiovascular disease; spondyloarthritis; and breast cancer. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This query tool was designed to provide results as pre-research so that institutional review board approval would not be required. This architecture uses well-described technologies that should be within the reach of most institutions.
Authors: M M Adams; H G Wilson; D L Casto; C J Berg; J M McDermott; J A Gaudino; B J McCarthy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1997-02-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: D E Goldgar; L A Cannon-Albright; A Oliphant; J H Ward; G Linker; J Swensen; T D Tran; P Fields; P Uharriet; M H Skolnick Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-03-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jie Xu; Luke V Rasmussen; Pamela L Shaw; Guoqian Jiang; Richard C Kiefer; Huan Mo; Jennifer A Pacheco; Peter Speltz; Qian Zhu; Joshua C Denny; Jyotishman Pathak; William K Thompson; Enid Montague Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Judy Y Ou; Rochelle R Smits-Seemann; Yelena P Wu; Jennifer Wright; Anne C Kirchhoff Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Judy Y Ou; Rochelle R Smits-Seemann; Sapna Kaul; Mark N Fluchel; Carol Sweeney; Anne C Kirchhoff Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Anita Y Kinney; Laurie E Steffen; Barbara H Brumbach; Wendy Kohlmann; Ruofei Du; Ji-Hyun Lee; Amanda Gammon; Karin Butler; Saundra S Buys; Antoinette M Stroup; Rebecca A Campo; Kristina G Flores; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anita Y Kinney; Karin M Butler; Marc D Schwartz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kenneth M Boucher; Lisa M Pappas; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Sandra L Edwards; Antoinette M Stroup; Saundra S Buys; Kristina G Flores; Rebecca A Campo Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Monica M Horvath; Shelley A Rusincovitch; Stephanie Brinson; Howard C Shang; Steve Evans; Jeffrey M Ferranti Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2014-07-19 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Alison Callahan; Vladimir Polony; José D Posada; Juan M Banda; Saurabh Gombar; Nigam H Shah Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Zubair Afzal; Martijn J Schuemie; Jan C van Blijderveen; Elif F Sen; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Jan A Kors Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2013-03-02 Impact factor: 2.796