Literature DB >> 23057044

Bone quality evaluation: comparison of cone beam computed tomography and subjective surgical assessment.

Jayasankar V Valiyaparambil1, Ibrahim Yamany, Denise Ortiz, David M Shafer, David Pendrys, Martin Freilich, Sanjay M Mallya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) gray scale values and Hounsfield units (HU), and whether the gray values of edentulous sites correlate with the subjective clinical bone quality assessed at surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two radiographic phantoms containing varying concentrations of either dipotassium hydrogen phosphate or calcium hydroxyapatite (HA) were imaged using multislice CT or CBCT. Reconstructed DICOM data were analyzed to examine the relationship between CBCT gray values and HU. Presurgical CBCT scans from 52 patients who underwent implant placement in the posterior sextants were used. The gray values of the edentulous implant sites were measured and compared with the subjective bone quality assessed at surgery.
RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between CBCT gray values and HU. CBCT gray values increased linearly with increasing calcium HA or bone equivalent density material. CBCT gray values measured at edentulous implant sites ranged from -455 to 642, with a trend of decreasing gray values with bone quality type. The median gray values for the four subjective bone types were: 362 (type 1), 214 (type 2), 76 (type 3), and -454 (type 4).
CONCLUSIONS: CBCT gray values can be used to infer bone density and may provide a valuable aid to predict bone quality at potential implant sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23057044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  24 in total

Review 1.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A torque-measuring micromotor provides operator independent measurements marking four different density areas in maxillae.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Paolo Arosio; Adriano Piattelli; Vittoria Perrotti; Giovanna Iezzi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Influence of exposure factors on the variability of CBCT voxel values: a phantom study.

Authors:  M L Oliveira; D Q Freitas; G M B Ambrosano; F Haiter-Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Derived Alveolar Bone Density Between Subjects with and without Aggressive Periodontitis.

Authors:  Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Eman Y Elfirt; Manea M Al-Ahmari; Ibrahim A Yamany; Maher A Alabdulkarim; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

5.  Assessment of CT numbers in limited and medium field-of-view scans taken using Accuitomo 170 and Veraviewepocs 3De cone-beam computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Matheus L Oliveira; Guilherme M Tosoni; David H Lindsey; Kristopher Mendoza; Sotirios Tetradis; Sanjay M Mallya
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-11-25

6.  Assessment of residual alveolar bone volume in hemodialysis patients using CBCT.

Authors:  Dan Zhao; Xiaolei Chen; Li Yue; Weiqing Liu; Anchun Mo; Haiyang Yu; Quan Yuan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Assessment of aging characteristics of female condylar trabecular structure by cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Guangnan Li; Haoliang Qian; Songsong Guo; Dongmiao Wang; Chao Sun; Yifei Du; Jie Cheng; Hongbing Jiang
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Correlation between Primary, Secondary Stability, Bone Density, Percentage of Vital Bone Formation and Implant Size.

Authors:  Vasilena Ivanova; Ivan Chenchev; Stefan Zlatev; Eitan Mijiritsky
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Diagnostic Performance of Conebeam CT Pixel Values in Active Fenestral Otosclerosis.

Authors:  F Deng; P Touska; K L Reinshagen; H D Curtin; A F Juliano
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.966

10.  Cone-beam computed tomography artifacts in the presence of dental implants and associated factors: an integrative review.

Authors:  Bianca Rodrigues Terrabuio; Caroline Gomes Carvalho; Mariela Peralta-Mamani; Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen; Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.