Literature DB >> 23054501

Esophageal pulse oximetry is more accurate and detects hypoxemia earlier than conventional pulse oximetry during general anesthesia.

Guo Chen1, Zhaoqiong Zhu, Jin Liu, Wei Wei.   

Abstract

The esophagus is perfused directly by prominent arteries and may provide a more consistent tissue source for pulse oximetry. The goal of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and accuracy of an esophageal pulse oximetry probe on patients during controlled hypoxemia in comparison to measurements obtained with conventional pulse oximetry (SpulseO(2)). Forty-five ASA I-II adult patients were included in this prospective observational study. Nellcor digital oximetric probes were placed on finger tips for SpulseO(2) before anesthesia. After tracheal intubation, an esophageal probe was placed in the lower segment of the esophagus for esophageal oximetric monitoring (SoesO(2)). All patients were disconnected from the breathing circuit to establish a controlled hypoxemia, and were re-connected to the breathing circuit and ventilated with 100% oxygen immediately when SoesO(2) dropped to 90%. Matched SoesO(2) and SpulseO(2) readings were recorded when SoesO(2) measurements were at 100%, 95%, 90% and the lowest reading. The time for SoesO(2) and SpulseO(2) to drop from 100% to 95%, 90% and return to 100% was recorded. Oxygen saturation from arterial blood samples (SartO(2)) was also measured at each time point respectively. The linear correlation coefficient of the regression analysis between SartO(2) and SoesO(2) was 0.954. The mean ± 2SD of the difference was 0.3% ± 4.3% for SoesO(2) vs. SartO(2) and 6.8% ± 5.6% for SpulseO(2) vs. SartO(2) (P < 0.001). The 95% confidence interval for the absolute difference between SoesO(2) and SartO(2) was 0.3% to 0.7% and 6.2% to 7.4% between SpulseO(2) and SartO(2). The time to reach 90% saturation measured with SoesO(2) was approximately 94 seconds earlier than the SpulseO(2) (P < 0.001). In conclusion, SoesO(2) is more accurate and enables earlier detection of hypoxemia when compared to conventional pulse oximetry during hypoxemia for patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054501     DOI: 10.1007/s11684-012-0217-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Med        ISSN: 2095-0217            Impact factor:   4.592


  20 in total

1.  The feasibility of transesophageal echocardiograph-guided right and left ventricular oximetry in hemodynamically stable patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  J Margreiter; C Keller; J Brimacombe
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Esophageal pulse oximetry utilizing reflectance photoplethysmography.

Authors:  Panayiotis A Kyriacou; Sarah Powell; Richard M Langford; Deric P Jones
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  [A pilot study of trans-esophageal aortic pulse oxygen saturation signals].

Authors:  Qiuju Xiong; Lin Mu; Li Wang; Wei Wei
Journal:  Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2010-04

Review 4.  Recent developments in pulse oximetry.

Authors:  J W Severinghaus; J F Kelleher
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  The successful use of transesophageal pulse oximetry in a patient in whom peripheral pulse oximetry was unobtainable.

Authors:  S E Borum
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Transesophageal versus surface pulse oximetry in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  M N Vicenzi; H Gombotz; H Krenn; C Dorn; P Rehak
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  A pilot study of continuous transtracheal mixed venous oxygen saturation monitoring.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Zhaoqiong Zhu; Lunxu Liu; Yunxia Zuo; Min Gong; Fushan Xue; Jin Liu
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Study of the optimal duration of preoxygenation in children.

Authors:  F S Xue; S Y Tong; X L Wang; X M Deng; G An
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 9.452

10.  A pilot study of neonatal and pediatric esophageal pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Panayiotis A Kyriacou; Deric P Jones; Richard M Langford; Andy J Petros
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  3 in total

1.  A multicentre prospective observational study comparing arterial blood gas values to those obtained by pulse oximeters used in adult patients attending Australian and New Zealand hospitals.

Authors:  Janine Pilcher; Laura Ploen; Steve McKinstry; George Bardsley; Jimmy Chien; Lesley Howard; Sharon Lee; Lutz Beckert; Maureen Swanney; Mark Weatherall; Richard Beasley
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.317

Review 2.  Pulse oximetry: fundamentals and technology update.

Authors:  Meir Nitzan; Ayal Romem; Robert Koppel
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-07-08

3.  Evaluation of a Novel Ear Pulse Oximeter: Towards Automated Oxygen Titration in Eyeglass Frames.

Authors:  Fabian Braun; Christophe Verjus; Josep Solà; Marcus Marienfeld; Manuela Funke-Chambour; Jens Krauss; Thomas Geiser; Sabina A Guler
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.