Literature DB >> 23053713

Physical and organizational provision for installation, regulatory requirements and implementation of a simultaneous hybrid PET/MR-imaging system in an integrated research and clinical setting.

Bernhard Sattler1, Thies Jochimsen, Henryk Barthel, Kerstin Sommerfeld, Patrick Stumpp, Karl-Titus Hoffmann, Matthias Gutberlet, Arno Villringer, Thomas Kahn, Osama Sabri.   

Abstract

The implementation of hybrid imaging systems requires thorough and anticipatory planning at local and regional levels. For installation of combined positron emission and magnetic resonance imaging systems (PET/MRI), a number of physical and constructional provisions concerning shielding of electromagnetic fields (RF- and high-field) as well as handling of radionuclides have to be met, the latter of which includes shielding for the emitted 511 keV gamma rays. Based on our experiences with a SIEMENS Biograph mMR system, a step-by-step approach is required to allow a trouble-free installation. In this article, we present a proposal for a standardized step-by-step plan to accomplish the installation of a combined PET/MRI system. Moreover, guidelines for the smooth operation of combined PET/MRI in an integrated research and clinical setting will be proposed. Overall, the most important preconditions for the successful implementation of PET/MRI in an integrated research and clinical setting is the interdisciplinary target-oriented cooperation between nuclear medicine, radiology, and all referring and collaborating institutions at all levels of interaction (personnel, imaging protocols, reporting, selection of the data transfer and communication methods).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053713     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-012-0347-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  22 in total

1.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Birgit Spors; Matthias Grothoff; Timm Denecke; Lutz Lüdemann; Ralph Noeske; Thoralf Niendorf; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol.

Authors:  Lee Friedman; Gary H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: feasibility and implications for clinical applications.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Ralph Noeske; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Roland Felix; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 4.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques.

Authors:  Matthias Hofmann; Bernd Pichler; Bernhard Schölkopf; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Acceptance testing for nuclear medicine instrumentation.

Authors:  Ellinor Busemann Sokole; Anna Płachcínska; Alan Britten
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Routine quality control recommendations for nuclear medicine instrumentation.

Authors:  Ellinor Busemann Sokole; Anna Płachcínska; Alan Britten; Maria Lyra Georgosopoulou; Wendy Tindale; Rigobert Klett
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Whole-body hybrid PET/MRI: ready for clinical use?

Authors:  Osman Ratib; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI.

Authors:  Sune H Keller; Søren Holm; Adam E Hansen; Bernhard Sattler; Flemming Andersen; Thomas L Klausen; Liselotte Højgaard; Andreas Kjær; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner.

Authors:  Gaspar Delso; Sebastian Fürst; Björn Jakoby; Ralf Ladebeck; Carl Ganter; Stephan G Nekolla; Markus Schwaiger; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Models for computer simulation studies of input functions for tracer kinetic modeling with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D Feng; S C Huang; X Wang
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1993-03
View more
  16 in total

1.  Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI.

Authors:  Sune H Keller; Søren Holm; Adam E Hansen; Bernhard Sattler; Flemming Andersen; Thomas L Klausen; Liselotte Højgaard; Andreas Kjær; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  MR/PET or PET/MRI: does it matter?

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Ewald Moser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Combined PET/MR: Where are we now? Summary report of the second international workshop on PET/MR imaging April 8-12, 2013, Tubingen, Germany.

Authors:  Dale L Bailey; Henryk Barthel; Bettina Beuthin-Baumann; Thomas Beyer; Sotirios Bisdas; Ronald Boellaard; Johannes Czernin; Alexander Drzezga; Ulrike Ernemann; Christiane Franzius; Brigitte Gückel; Rupert Handgretinger; Markus Hartenbach; Dirk Hellwig; Helen Nadel; Stephan G Nekolla; Thomas Pfluger; Bernd J Pichler; Harald H Quick; Osama Sabri; Bernhard Sattler; Jürgen Schäfer; Fritz Schick; Barry A Siegel; Heinz P Schlemmer; Nina F Schwenzer; Jörg van den Hoff; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Hans F Wehrl
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Competitive advantage of PET/MRI.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Patrick M Colletti
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Integrated PET/MRI for planning navigated biopsies in pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Matthias Preuss; Peter Werner; Henryk Barthel; Ulf Nestler; Holger Christiansen; Franz Wolfgang Hirsch; Dominik Fritzsch; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Matthias K Bernhard; Osama Sabri
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  PET and MR imaging: the odd couple or a match made in heaven?

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Alexander R Guimaraes; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Current Status of Hybrid PET/MRI in Oncologic Imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Kent Friedman; Hersh Chandarana; Amy Melsaether; Linda Moy; Yu-Shin Ding; Komal Jhaveri; Luis Beltran; Rajan Jain
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  PET/MRI in cancer patients: first experiences and vision from Copenhagen.

Authors:  Andreas Kjær; Annika Loft; Ian Law; Anne Kiil Berthelsen; Lise Borgwardt; Johan Löfgren; Camilla Bardram Johnbeck; Adam Espe Hansen; Sune Keller; Søren Holm; Liselotte Højgaard
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Image quality assessment of automatic three-segment MR attenuation correction vs. CT attenuation correction.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Andres Kohan; Chiara Gaeta; Christian Rubbert; Jose L Vercher-Conejero; Robert S Jones; James K O'Donnell; Patrick Wojtylak; Peter Faulhaber
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-09

10.  In Vivo Correlation of Glucose Metabolism, Cell Density and Microcirculatory Parameters in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Results Using Simultaneous PET/MRI.

Authors:  Matthias Gawlitza; Sandra Purz; Klaus Kubiessa; Andreas Boehm; Henryk Barthel; Regine Kluge; Thomas Kahn; Osama Sabri; Patrick Stumpp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.