Literature DB >> 2064268

Effects of preoperative electrical stimulability and historical factors on performance with multichannel cochlear implant.

P R Kileny1, S Zimmerman-Phillips, J L Kemink, S P Schmaltz.   

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between results of preoperative transtympanic electrical promontory stimulation, duration of deafness, postoperative implanted psychophysical results, and postoperative speech and speech sound recognition as indicated by a battery of five tests. Our subjects were 10 patients implanted with the Cochlear Corporation multielectrode implant, 1 year postimplantation, with a minimum of 17 active electrodes programmed in the bipolar + 1 mode. The results indicated that preoperative promontory thresholds, the slope of the threshold function, and the duration of auditory deprivation are excellent predictors of postoperative speech and speech sound recognition in the auditory (processor alone) mode. These results have significant implications for patient selection and counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2064268     DOI: 10.1177/000348949110000708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  9 in total

1.  Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 2.  The convergence of cochlear implantation with induced pluripotent stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Niliksha Gunewardene; Mirella Dottori; Bryony A Nayagam
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Effects of antioxidants on auditory nerve function and survival in deafened guinea pigs.

Authors:  Jun Maruyama; Takahiko Yamagata; Mats Ulfendahl; Göran Bredberg; Richard A Altschuler; Josef M Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 5.996

4.  Psychophysical metrics and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Stem cell transplantation for auditory nerve replacement.

Authors:  Richard A Altschuler; K Sue O'Shea; Josef M Miller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.

Authors:  Mohammad Alfelasi; Jean Pierre Piron; Caroline Mathiolon; Nadjmah Lenel; Michel Mondain; Alain Uziel; Frederic Venail
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Glutamatergic neuronal differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells after transient expression of neurogenin 1 and treatment with BDNF and GDNF: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Jeannie H Reyes; K Sue O'Shea; Noel L Wys; J Matthew Velkey; Diane M Prieskorn; Karolina Wesolowski; Josef M Miller; Richard A Altschuler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Sheryl R Erenberg; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-03-09

Review 9.  Development of implantable medical devices: from an engineering perspective.

Authors:  Yeun-Ho Joung
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.835

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.