Literature DB >> 18792109

The role of the promontory stimulation test in cochlear implantation.

Samuel C L Kuo1, William P R Gibson.   

Abstract

To date, 290 adults have been implanted in the cochlear implant programme in Sydney (Australia), where the promontory stimulation test (PST) is routinely used to assess implant candidacy. There has been much controversy over the exact role and value of this test. Pre- and postoperative speech comprehension tests of 150 implantees were analysed, and scores were compared with preoperative PST performances. Eighty-nine per cent of the patients perceived sound when the promontory was stimulated electrically. This group of implantees scored 81% on CID speech tests at 12 months postoperatively, compared to the minority who lacked preoperative promontory stimulability, who scored 42%. The PST is therefore predictive of greater speech benefits after implantation. It also provides an important psychophysical experience of hearing electrical sound.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 18792109     DOI: 10.1179/cim.2002.3.1.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  5 in total

1.  Would an endosteal CI-electrode make sense? Comparison of the auditory nerve excitability from different stimulation sites using ESRT measurements and mathematical models.

Authors:  Hans Wilhelm Pau; Annekathrin Grünbaum; Karsten Ehrt; Rüdiger Dahl; Tino Just; Ursula van Rienen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.

Authors:  Mohammad Alfelasi; Jean Pierre Piron; Caroline Mathiolon; Nadjmah Lenel; Michel Mondain; Alain Uziel; Frederic Venail
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Cochlear implantation for hearing rehabilitation in single-sided deafness after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Frederike Hassepass; Susan Arndt; Antje Aschendorff; Roland Laszig; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Evaluation of Temporal Difference Limen in Preoperative Non-Invasive Ear Canal Audiometry as a Predictive Factor for Speech Perception after Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Saku T Sinkkonen; Lars Kronlund; Johannes Hautamäki; Jussi Jero; Antti A Aarnisalo; Erna Kentala
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-02-27

5.  Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Temporal Bone Trauma: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Michael Eastwood; Kirsty Biggs; Chris Metcalfe; Jameel Muzaffar; Peter Monksfield; Manohar Bance
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.316

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.