Literature DB >> 21659787

Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users.

Adam Walkowiak1, Artur Lorens, Marek Polak, Bozena Kostek, Henryk Skarzynski, Agata Szkielkowska, Piotr Henryk Skarzynski.   

Abstract

AIM: The main goal of the present study was to assess the feasibility of using evoked stapedius reflex (eSR) and evoked compound action potential (eCAP) thresholds to create speech processor programs for children using Med-El Maestro software. The secondary goals were (1) to compare the eSR and eCAP thresholds recorded using charge units in experienced adults fitted with Med-El Pulsar CI100 cochlear implants with most comfortable loudness levels (MCLs) obtained for the apical, medial and basal electrodes, and (2) to compare eSR and eCAP thresholds for the apical, medial and basal electrodes between adults and children.
METHODS: Fourteen children and 16 adults participated in the study. eSR and eCAP thresholds were measured in both groups using the auditory nerve response telemetry algorithm, with MCL being behaviourally measured only in the adult group.
RESULTS: In the adult population, the correlation between eSR threshold and MCL was better for apical, medial and basal electrodes than that between eCAP threshold and MCL. There was no significant difference in the means obtained for eCAP and eSR thresholds in children and adults for any of the electrodes tested. This finding suggests that in children, the correlations between eCAP thresholds and MCL values, and those between eSR thresholds and MCL values are not lower than those generally found in adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the eSR threshold is a better predictor of MCL values, both eSR and eCAP thresholds can be useful tools for assisting with map creation for children.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21659787     DOI: 10.1159/000326892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec        ISSN: 0301-1569            Impact factor:   1.538


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; R Beck; L Jung; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.

Authors:  Mohammad Alfelasi; Jean Pierre Piron; Caroline Mathiolon; Nadjmah Lenel; Michel Mondain; Alain Uziel; Frederic Venail
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Cochlear Implantation for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lavin K Entwisle; Sarah E Warren; Jessica J Messersmith
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

4.  ARTFit-A Quick and Reliable Tool for Performing Initial Fittings in Users of MED-EL Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Lutz Gärtner; Timo Bräcker; Mathias Kals; Richard T Penninger; Mareike Billinger-Finke; Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11

5.  Cortical auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users: An objective method to improve speech perception.

Authors:  Dayse Távora-Vieira; Andre Wedekind; Ellen Ffoulkes; Marcus Voola; Roberta Marino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 6.  The importance of electrically evoked stapedial reflex in cochlear implant.

Authors:  Kelly Cristina Lira de Andrade; Mariana de Carvalho Leal; Lilian Ferreira Muniz; Pedro de Lemos Menezes; Katia Maria Gomes de Albuquerque; Aline Tenório Lins Carnaúba
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.