Literature DB >> 23052939

Effects of anti-resorptive agents on trabecular bone score (TBS) in older women.

M A Krieg1, B Aubry-Rozier, D Hans, W D Leslie.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the longitudinal effects of anti-resorptive agents (534 treated women vs. 1,150 untreated) on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS). TBS was responsive to treatment in women over age 50. The treatment-related increase in TBS was less than the increase in BMD, which is consistent with bone texture preservation.
INTRODUCTION: In addition to inducing an increase in BMD, anti-resorptive agents also help to preserve bone architecture. TBS, a new gray-level texture measurement, correlates with 3D parameters of bone micro-architecture independent of BMD. Our objective was to evaluate the longitudinal effects of anti-resorptive agents on lumbar spine BMD and TBS.
METHODS: Women (≥ 50 years), from the BMD program database for the province of Manitoba, Canada, who had not received any anti-resorptive drug prior to their initial dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) exam were divided into two groups: untreated, those without any anti-resorptive drug over the course of follow-up, and treated, those with a non-estrogen anti-resorptive drug (86 % bisphosphonates, 10 % raloxifene, and 4 % calcitonin). Lumbar spine TBS was calculated for each lumbar spine DXA examination. Changes in TBS and BMD between baseline and follow-up (mean follow-up 3.7 years), expressed in percentage per year, were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 1,150 untreated women and 534 treated women met the inclusion criteria. Only a weak correlation was seen between BMD and TBS in either group. Significant intergroup differences in BMD change and TBS change were observed over the course of follow-up (p < 0.001). Similar mean decreases in BMD and TBS (-0.36 %/year and -0.31 %/year, respectively) were seen for untreated subjects (both p < 0.001). Conversely, treated subjects exhibited a significant mean increase in BMD (+1.86 %/year, p < 0.002) and TBS (+0.20 %/year, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: TBS is responsive to treatment with non-estrogen anti-resorptive drug therapy in women over age 50. The treatment-related increase in TBS is less than the increase in BMD, which is consistent with bone texture preservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052939     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2155-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  31 in total

1.  Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system.

Authors:  N P Roos; E Shapiro
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; Gary M Kiebzak; E Michael Lewiecki; Diane Krueger; Ronald E Gangnon; Paul D Miller; John A Shepherd; Marc K Drezner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Correlations between grey-level variations in 2D projection images (TBS) and 3D microarchitecture: applications in the study of human trabecular bone microarchitecture.

Authors:  Laurent Pothuaud; Pascal Carceller; Didier Hans
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Bone microarchitecture assessed by TBS predicts osteoporotic fractures independent of bone density: the Manitoba study.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Andrew L Goertzen; Marc-Antoine Krieg; William D Leslie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Correlations between trabecular bone score, measured using anteroposterior dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry acquisition, and 3-dimensional parameters of bone microarchitecture: an experimental study on human cadaver vertebrae.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Nicole Barthe; Stephanie Boutroy; Laurent Pothuaud; Renaud Winzenrieth; Marc-Antoine Krieg
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 6.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1994

7.  Trabecular architecture in women and men of similar bone mass with and without vertebral fracture: I. Two-dimensional histology.

Authors:  L D Hordon; M Raisi; J E Aaron; S K Paxton; M Beneton; J A Kanis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Prediction of hip and other osteoporotic fractures from hip geometry in a large clinical cohort.

Authors:  W D Leslie; P S Pahlavan; J F Tsang; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice.

Authors:  William D Leslie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Mortality following fractures in older women. The study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  W S Browner; A R Pressman; M C Nevitt; S R Cummings
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-07-22
View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Utility of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in secondary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Fabio M Ulivieri; Barbara C Silva; Francesco Sardanelli; Didier Hans; John P Bilezikian; Renata Caudarella
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Comparative effects of teriparatide and ibandronate on spine bone mineral density (BMD) and microarchitecture (TBS) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a 2-year open-label study.

Authors:  C Senn; B Günther; A W Popp; R Perrelet; D Hans; K Lippuner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Effects of Teriparatide, Denosumab, or Both on Spine Trabecular Microarchitecture in DATA-Switch: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Joy N Tsai; Linda A Jiang; Hang Lee; Didier Hans; Benjamin Z Leder
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 4.  Quantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ling Oei; Fjorda Koromani; Fernando Rivadeneira; M Carola Zillikens; Edwin H G Oei
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

5.  Trabecular bone score in healthy ageing.

Authors:  A Bazzocchi; F Ponti; D Diano; M Amadori; U Albisinni; G Battista; G Guglielmi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Early changes in bone turnover predict longer-term changes in bone mineral density but not trabecular bone score in frail older women.

Authors:  Mary P Kotlarczyk; Subashan Perera; Neil M Resnick; David A Nace; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL) bone health ancillary study: clinical factors associated with trabecular bone score in women and men.

Authors:  A L Goldman; C M Donlon; N R Cook; J E Manson; J E Buring; T Copeland; C Y Yu; M S LeBoff
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Effects of zoledronic acid versus placebo on bone mineral density and bone texture analysis assessed by the trabecular bone score in premenopausal women with breast cancer treatment-induced bone loss: results of the ProBONE II substudy.

Authors:  M Kalder; I Kyvernitakis; U S Albert; M Baier-Ebert; P Hadji
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Trabecular bone score (TBS)--a novel method to evaluate bone microarchitectural texture in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Barbara Campolina Silva; Stephanie Boutroy; Chiyuan Zhang; Donald Jay McMahon; Bin Zhou; Ji Wang; Julia Udesky; Serge Cremers; Marta Sarquis; Xiang-Dong Edward Guo; Didier Hans; John Paul Bilezikian
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Predictors of trabecular bone score in school children.

Authors:  K Shawwa; A Arabi; M Nabulsi; J Maalouf; M Salamoun; M Choucair; D Hans; G El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.