Literature DB >> 23052495

EVA: laparoscopic instrument tracking based on Endoscopic Video Analysis for psychomotor skills assessment.

Ignacio Oropesa1, Patricia Sánchez-González, Magdalena K Chmarra, Pablo Lamata, Alvaro Fernández, Juan A Sánchez-Margallo, Frank Willem Jansen, Jenny Dankelman, Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo, Enrique J Gómez.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The EVA (Endoscopic Video Analysis) tracking system is a new system for extracting motions of laparoscopic instruments based on nonobtrusive video tracking. The feasibility of using EVA in laparoscopic settings has been tested in a box trainer setup.
METHODS: EVA makes use of an algorithm that employs information of the laparoscopic instrument's shaft edges in the image, the instrument's insertion point, and the camera's optical center to track the three-dimensional position of the instrument tip. A validation study of EVA comprised a comparison of the measurements achieved with EVA and the TrEndo tracking system. To this end, 42 participants (16 novices, 22 residents, and 4 experts) were asked to perform a peg transfer task in a box trainer. Ten motion-based metrics were used to assess their performance.
RESULTS: Construct validation of the EVA has been obtained for seven motion-based metrics. Concurrent validation revealed that there is a strong correlation between the results obtained by EVA and the TrEndo for metrics, such as path length (ρ = 0.97), average speed (ρ = 0.94), or economy of volume (ρ = 0.85), proving the viability of EVA.
CONCLUSIONS: EVA has been successfully validated in a box trainer setup, showing the potential of endoscopic video analysis to assess laparoscopic psychomotor skills. The results encourage further implementation of video tracking in training setups and image-guided surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052495     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2513-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  39 in total

1.  The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model.

Authors:  V Datta; S Mackay; M Mandalia; A Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Metrics for objective Assessment.

Authors:  R M Satava; A Cuschieri; J Hamdorf
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Computer-enhanced laparoscopic training system (CELTS): bridging the gap.

Authors:  N Stylopoulos; S Cotin; S K Maithel; M Ottensmeye; P G Jackson; R S Bardsley; P F Neumann; D W Rattner; S L Dawson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; K Moorthy; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Image-guidance for surgical procedures.

Authors:  Terry M Peters
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Tracking endoscopic instruments without localizer: image analysis-based approach.

Authors:  Oliver Tonet; T U Ramesh; Giuseppe Megali; Paolo Dario
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2006

7.  An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Krishna Moorthy; Thor Milland; Pavlos Papasavas; Aristotelis Dosis; Fernando Bello; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Concurrent validity of augmented reality metrics applied to the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS).

Authors:  E M Ritter; T W Kindelan; C Michael; E A Pimentel; M W Bowyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Objective assessment of technical performance.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Visual tracking of laparoscopic instruments in standard training environments.

Authors:  Brian F Allen; Florian Kasper; Gabriele Nataneli; Erik Dutson; Petros Faloutsos
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2011
View more
  21 in total

1.  Construct validity of a video-tracking system based on orthogonal cameras approach for objective assessment of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Fernando Pérez-Escamirosa; Alberto Chousleb-Kalach; Maria Del Carmen Hernández-Baro; Juan Alberto Sánchez-Margallo; Daniel Lorias-Espinoza; Arturo Minor-Martínez
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Objective assessment based on motion-related metrics and technical performance in laparoscopic suturing.

Authors:  Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Ignacio Oropesa; Silvia Enciso; Enrique J Gómez
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Comparison of the performance of experienced and novice surgeons: measurement of gripping force during laparoscopic surgery performed on pigs using forceps with pressure sensors.

Authors:  Azumi Araki; Kazuhide Makiyama; Hiroyuki Yamanaka; Daiki Ueno; Kimito Osaka; Manabu Nagasaka; Takahiro Yamada; Masahiro Yao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of the goals and MISTELS scores for the evaluation of surgeons on training benches.

Authors:  Rémi Wolf; Maud Medici; Gaëlle Fiard; Jean-Alexandre Long; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Philippe Cinquin; Sandrine Voros
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Interpretation of motion analysis of laparoscopic instruments based on principal component analysis in box trainer settings.

Authors:  Ignacio Oropesa; Fernando Pérez Escamirosa; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Silvia Enciso; Borja Rodríguez-Vila; Arturo Minor Martínez; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Enrique J Gómez; Patricia Sánchez-González
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic training using a quantitative assessment and instructional system.

Authors:  T Yamaguchi; R Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Objective classification of psychomotor laparoscopic skills of surgeons based on three different approaches.

Authors:  Fernando Pérez-Escamirosa; Antonio Alarcón-Paredes; Gustavo Adolfo Alonso-Silverio; Ignacio Oropesa; Oscar Camacho-Nieto; Daniel Lorias-Espinoza; Arturo Minor-Martínez
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Sensor-based machine learning for workflow detection and as key to detect expert level in laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Carly R Garrow; Mona W Schmidt; Laura Benner; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Face, content, and construct validity of the EndoViS training system for objective assessment of psychomotor skills of laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Fernando Pérez Escamirosa; Ricardo Manuel Ordorica Flores; Ignacio Oropesa García; Cristian Rubén Zalles Vidal; Arturo Minor Martínez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Working volume: validity evidence for a motion-based metric of surgical efficiency.

Authors:  Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Drew N Rutherford; Rebecca D Ray; Shlomi Laufer; Andrea Mason; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.