Literature DB >> 17522527

An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room.

Rajesh Aggarwal1, Teodor Grantcharov, Krishna Moorthy, Thor Milland, Pavlos Papasavas, Aristotelis Dosis, Fernando Bello, Ara Darzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of a synchronized video-based motion tracking device for objective, instant, and automated assessment of laparoscopic skill in the operating room. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The assessment of technical skills is fundamental to recognition of proficient surgical practice. It is necessary to demonstrate the validity, reliability, and feasibility of any tool to be applied for objective measurement of performance.
METHODS: Nineteen subjects, divided into 13 experienced (performed >100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies) and 6 inexperienced (performed <10 LCs) surgeons completed LCs on 53 patients who all had a diagnosis of biliary colic. Each procedure was recorded with the ROVIMAS video-based motion tracking device to provide an objective measure of the surgeon's dexterity. Each video was also rated by 2 experienced observers on a previously validated operative assessment scale.
RESULTS: There were significant differences for motion tracking parameters between the 2 groups of surgeons for the Calot triangle dissection part of procedure for time taken (P = 0.002), total path length (P = 0.026), and number of movements (P = 0.005). Both motion tracking and video-based assessment displayed intertest reliability, and there were good correlations between the 2 modes of assessment (r = 0.4 to 0.7, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: An instant, objective, valid, and reliable mode of assessment of laparoscopic performance in the operating room has been defined. This may serve to reduce the time taken for technical skills assessment, and subsequently lead to accurate and efficient audit and credentialing of surgeons for independent practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17522527      PMCID: PMC1876956          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000262780.17950.e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  39 in total

1.  What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation?

Authors:  A Cuschieri; N Francis; J Crosby; G B Hanna
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Practice distribution in procedural skills training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Mackay; P Morgan; V Datta; A Chang; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement.

Authors:  Charles Vincent; Krishna Moorthy; Sudip K Sarker; Avril Chang; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; K Moorthy; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Toward reliable operative assessment: the reliability and feasibility of videotaped assessment of laparoscopic technical skills.

Authors:  D Dath; G Regehr; D Birch; C Schlachta; E Poulin; J Mamazza; R Reznick; H M MacRae
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The reliability of multiple objective measures of surgery and the role of human performance.

Authors:  Simon Bann; Iain Mackay Davis; Krishna Moorthy; Yaron Munz; Juan Hernandez; Mansoor Khan; Vivek Datta; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Analysis of errors enacted by surgical trainees during skills training courses.

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis.

Authors:  P Joice; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Competence assessment of laparoscopic operative and cognitive skills: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) or Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA).

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; F Carter; G D Adamson; J P Martindale; A Cuschieri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.282

View more
  42 in total

1.  A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Validation of an online assessment of orthopedic surgery residents' cognitive skills and preparedness for carpal tunnel release surgery.

Authors:  Janet Shanedling; Ann Van Heest; Michael Rodriguez; Matthew Putnam; Julie Agel
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-09

3.  Implications of the law on video recording in clinical practice.

Authors:  Kirsten R Henken; Frank Willem Jansen; Jan Klein; Laurents P S Stassen; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Intraoperative monitoring of laparoscopic skill development based on quantitative measures.

Authors:  Sayra M Cristancho; Antony J Hodgson; O N M Panton; Adam Meneghetti; Garth Warnock; Karim Qayumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Requirements for the structured recording of surgical device data in the digital operating room.

Authors:  Max Rockstroh; Stefan Franke; Thomas Neumuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Impact of established skills in open surgery on the proficiency gain process for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel C Brown; Danilo Miskovic; Benjie Tang; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Supervised classification of psychomotor competence in minimally invasive surgery based on instruments motion analysis.

Authors:  Ignacio Oropesa; Patricia Sánchez-Gonzáez; Magdalena K Chmarra; Pablo Lamata; Rodrigo Pérez-Rodríguez; Frank Willem Jansen; Jenny Dankelman; Enrique J Gómez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Automated objective surgical skill assessment in the operating room from unstructured tool motion in septoplasty.

Authors:  Narges Ahmidi; Piyush Poddar; Jonathan D Jones; S Swaroop Vedula; Lisa Ishii; Gregory D Hager; Masaru Ishii
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 9.  A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Elif Bilgic; Ekaterina Lebedeva; Katherine M McKendy; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Validation of a high-fidelity model in ureteroscopy incorporating hand motion analysis.

Authors:  José A Salvadó; Felipe Oyanedel; Sebastian Sepúlveda; Hernán Toledo; Álvaro Saavedra; Gaston Astroza; Lucas Consigliere
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.