Literature DB >> 30790048

Sensor-based machine learning for workflow detection and as key to detect expert level in laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying.

Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski1, Carly R Garrow1, Mona W Schmidt1, Laura Benner2, Beat P Müller-Stich1, Felix Nickel3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The most common way of assessing surgical performance is by expert raters to view a surgical task and rate a trainee's performance. However, there is huge potential for automated skill assessment and workflow analysis using modern technology. The aim of the present study was to evaluate machine learning (ML) algorithms using the data of a Myo armband as a sensor device for skills level assessment and phase detection in laparoscopic training.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants of three experience levels in laparoscopy performed a suturing and knot tying task on silicon models. Experts rated performance using Objective Structured Assessment of Surgical Skills (OSATS). Participants wore Myo armbands (Thalmic Labs™, Ontario, Canada) to record acceleration, angular velocity, orientation, and Euler orientation. ML algorithms (decision forest, neural networks, boosted decision tree) were compared for skill level assessment and phase detection.
RESULTS: 28 participants (8 beginner, 10 intermediate, 10 expert) were included, and 99 knots were available for analysis. A neural network regression model had the lowest mean absolute error in predicting OSATS score (3.7 ± 0.6 points, r2 = 0.03 ± 0.81; OSATS min.-max.: 4-37 points). An ensemble of binary-class neural networks yielded the highest accuracy in predicting skill level (beginners: 82.2% correctly identified, intermediate: 3.0%, experts: 79.5%) whereas standard statistical analysis failed to discriminate between skill levels. Phase detection on raw data showed the best results with a multi-class decision jungle (average 16% correctly identified), but improved to 43% average accuracy with two-class boosted decision trees after Dynamic time warping (DTW) application.
CONCLUSION: Modern machine learning algorithms aid in interpreting complex surgical motion data, even when standard analysis fails. Dynamic time warping offers the potential to process and compare surgical motion data in order to allow automated surgical workflow detection. However, further research is needed to interpret and standardize available data and improve sensor accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Electromyography; Laparoscopic training; Laparoscopy; Machine learning; Myo armband; Neural networks; Skill assessment; Surgical education; Workflow analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 30790048     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06667-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

1.  Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Ravi P Kiran; Anthony J Senagore; Karen Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; J Wallis Marsh; Allan Tsung; J Jennifer L Steel; T Clark Gamblin; David A Geller
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-11-15

Review 3.  Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M M Reza; J A Blasco; E Andradas; R Cantero; J Mayol
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Curriculum-based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality.

Authors:  Yaron Munz; Alex M Almoudaris; Krishna Moorthy; Aristotelis Dosis; Alexander D Liddle; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying-a randomized controlled trial "The Shoebox Study" DRKS00008668.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Jonathan D Hendrie; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Thomas Bruckner; Carly R Garrow; Maisha Mantel; Hannes G Kenngott; Philipp Romero; Lars Fischer; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Susannah M Wyles; Paris Tekkis; George B Hanna
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Bridging the gap between formal and experience-based knowledge for context-aware laparoscopy.

Authors:  Darko Katić; Jürgen Schuck; Anna-Laura Wekerle; Hannes Kenngott; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Rüdiger Dillmann; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  EVA: laparoscopic instrument tracking based on Endoscopic Video Analysis for psychomotor skills assessment.

Authors:  Ignacio Oropesa; Patricia Sánchez-González; Magdalena K Chmarra; Pablo Lamata; Alvaro Fernández; Juan A Sánchez-Margallo; Frank Willem Jansen; Jenny Dankelman; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Enrique J Gómez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Video content analysis of surgical procedures.

Authors:  Constantinos Loukas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A software-based tool for video motion tracking in the surgical skills assessment landscape.

Authors:  Sandeep Ganni; Sanne M B I Botden; Magdalena Chmarra; Richard H M Goossens; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  6 in total

1.  Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sandeep Ganni; Sanne M B I Botden; Magdalena Chmarra; Meng Li; Richard H M Goossens; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Automated recognition of objects and types of forceps in surgical images using deep learning.

Authors:  Yoshiko Bamba; Shimpei Ogawa; Michio Itabashi; Shingo Kameoka; Takahiro Okamoto; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  State-of-the-art of situation recognition systems for intraoperative procedures.

Authors:  D Junger; S M Frommer; O Burgert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence for renal cancer: From imaging to histology and beyond.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Luisa Egen; Chanel E Fischetti; Stefano Puliatti; Gomez Rivas Juan; Mark Taratkin; Rivero Belenchon Ines; Marie Angela Sidoti Abate; Julia Mühlbauer; Frederik Wessels; Enrico Checcucci; Giovanni Cacciamani
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2022-06-18

5.  A system for real-time multivariate feature combination of endoscopic mitral valve simulator training data.

Authors:  Reinhard Fuchs; Karel M Van Praet; Richard Bieck; Jörg Kempfert; David Holzhey; Markus Kofler; Michael A Borger; Stephan Jacobs; Volkmar Falk; Thomas Neumuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  E Willuth; S F Hardon; F Lang; C M Haney; E A Felinska; K F Kowalewski; B P Müller-Stich; T Horeman; F Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.