Literature DB >> 23052108

Decreased ratios of lateral to medial patellofemoral forces and pressures after lateral retinacular release and gender knees in total knee arthroplasty.

Joseph J King1, Rajit Chakravarty, Douglas L Cerynik, Aaron Black, Norman A Johanson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that lateral to medial patellofemoral force and pressure ratios could be a surrogate marker of retinacular tension and patellar tracking.
METHODS: The patellofemoral forces of six knees from three fresh-frozen half-body female cadavers were evaluated with a capacitive sensor under simulated operative conditions in six staged clinical scenarios: native knees, knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing, resurfaced knee and patella, resurfaced knee and patella with lateral release, gender-specific knee arthroplasty with patella resurfacing, and gender-specific knee arthroplasty with lateral release. Maximum force and peak pressure were simultaneously recorded during three to four ranges of motion. Average values were compared between lateral and medial patellofemoral compartments as an objective measure of patellar tracking for the different settings.
RESULTS: Significant differences in lateral and medial force and pressure differentials were seen in most scenarios despite clinically normal patellar tracking. Lateral to medial ratios of maximum force and peak pressure significantly increased after TKA (2.9, 2.1) and after patella resurfacing (2.8, 2.6) compared to the native knee (1.6, 1.8). Addition of a lateral release in resurfaced knees decreased the ratio of lateral to medial patellofemoral forces and pressures as did gender knee arthroplasty (1.5 and 1.1, 2 and 1.3, respectively). Pressure and force values most closely resembled the native knee in the resurfaced knee/resurfaced patella with lateral release and in the gender knee arthroplasty scenarios.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of lateral to medial patellofemoral force ratios as a surrogate objective marker for patellar tracking was validated in this study by decreasing ratios observed after lateral release in TKA and with gender-specific implants.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052108     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2200-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  40 in total

1.  Patellar resurfacing in total condylar knee arthroplasty. Technique and results.

Authors:  P J Rae; J Noble; J P Hodgkinson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Impact of patellofemoral design on patellofemoral forces and polyethylene stresses.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Peter C Chen; Mark A Kester; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Does lateral release change patellofemoral forces and pressures?: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Peretz; Kim R Driftmier; Douglas L Cerynik; Neil S Kumar; Norman A Johanson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The Pedar in-shoe system: repeatability and normal pressure values.

Authors:  A B Putti; G P Arnold; L Cochrane; R J Abboud
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Dynamic measurement of patellofemoral kinematics and contact pressure after lateral retinacular release: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sven Ostermeier; Marc Holst; Christof Hurschler; Henning Windhagen; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A technique of staged lateral release to correct patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robin K Strachan; Azhar M Merican; Bernard Devadasan; Rohit Maheshwari; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Patellofemoral pressure after TKA in vitro: highly conforming vs. posterior stabilized inlays.

Authors:  Thomas Jan Heyse; Christoph Becher; Nadine Kron; Sven Ostermeier; Christof Hurschler; Markus D Schofer; Carsten O Tibesku; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs.

Authors:  J T Chew; N J Stewart; A D Hanssen; Z P Luo; J A Rand; K N An
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Correlation with implant design and patient risk factors.

Authors:  W L Healy; S A Wasilewski; R Takei; M Oberlander
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Analysis of the outcome in male and female patients using a unisex total knee replacement system.

Authors:  D F Dalury; J B Mason; J A Murphy; M J Adams
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-03
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Lack of evidence to support present medial release methods in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nicola C Hunt; Kanishka M Ghosh; Kiron K Athwal; Lee M Longstaff; Andrew A Amis; David J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Less anterior knee pain with a routine lateral release in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Guo-Chun Zha; Jun-Ying Sun; Sheng-Jie Dong
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Preoperative Varus-Valgus Stress Angle Difference Is Valuable for Predicting the Extent of Medial Release in Varus Deformity during Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  O-Sung Lee; Ashraf Elazab; Yong Seuk Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-03-01

Review 4.  Lateral patellar retinacular release: changes over the last ten years.

Authors:  Leonardo Pini Rosalem Marciano da Fonseca; Ednei Haruo Kawatake; Alberto de Castro Pochini
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-06-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.