Literature DB >> 23047668

Extreme binocular vision and a straight bill facilitate tool use in New Caledonian crows.

Jolyon Troscianko1, Auguste M P von Bayern, Jackie Chappell, Christian Rutz, Graham R Martin.   

Abstract

Humans are expert tool users, who manipulate objects with dextrous hands and precise visual control. Surprisingly, morphological predispositions, or adaptations, for tool use have rarely been examined in non-human animals. New Caledonian crows Corvus moneduloides use their bills to craft complex tools from sticks, leaves and other materials, before inserting them into deadwood or vegetation to extract prey. Here we show that tool use in these birds is facilitated by an unusual visual-field topography and bill shape. Their visual field has substantially greater binocular overlap than that of any other bird species investigated to date, including six non-tool-using corvids. Furthermore, their unusually straight bill enables a stable grip on tools, and raises the tool tip into their visual field's binocular sector. These features enable a degree of tool control that would be impossible in other corvids, despite their comparable cognitive abilities. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence for tool-use-related morphological features outside the hominin lineage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23047668     DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  13 in total

Review 1.  The visual ecology of avian photoreceptors.

Authors:  N S Hart
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  The ecological significance of tool use in New Caledonian crows.

Authors:  Christian Rutz; Lucas A Bluff; Nicola Reed; Jolyon Troscianko; Jason Newton; Richard Inger; Alex Kacelnik; Stuart Bearhop
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Tool use by wild New Caledonian crows Corvus moneduloides at natural foraging sites.

Authors:  Lucas A Bluff; Jolyon Troscianko; Alex A S Weir; Alex Kacelnik; Christian Rutz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  What is binocular vision for? A birds' eye view.

Authors:  Graham R Martin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Evolution of the human hand: approaches to acquiring, analysing and interpreting the anatomical evidence.

Authors:  M W Marzke; R F Marzke
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  Hand function and tool behavior in early hominids.

Authors:  R L Susman
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.895

Review 7.  Precision grips, hand morphology, and tools.

Authors:  M W Marzke
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  Fossil evidence for early hominid tool use.

Authors:  R L Susman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Binocular distance perception.

Authors:  J M Foley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Visual coverage and scanning behavior in two corvid species: American crow and Western scrub jay.

Authors:  Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Colleen O'Rourke; Todd Pitlik
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  The subtlety of simple eyes: the tuning of visual fields to perceptual challenges in birds.

Authors:  Graham R Martin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Tool use by aquatic animals.

Authors:  Janet Mann; Eric M Patterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Why Brains Are Not Computers, Why Behaviorism Is Not Satanism, and Why Dolphins Are Not Aquatic Apes.

Authors:  Louise Barrett
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2015-11-11

4.  Working memory capacity of crows and monkeys arises from similar neuronal computations.

Authors:  Lukas Alexander Hahn; Dmitry Balakhonov; Erica Fongaro; Andreas Nieder; Jonas Rose
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Dimensions of Animal Consciousness.

Authors:  Jonathan Birch; Alexandra K Schnell; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Discovery of species-wide tool use in the Hawaiian crow.

Authors:  Christian Rutz; Barbara C Klump; Lisa Komarczyk; Rosanna Leighton; Joshua Kramer; Saskia Wischnewski; Shoko Sugasawa; Michael B Morrissey; Richard James; James J H St Clair; Richard A Switzer; Bryce M Masuda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Interspecific differences in the visual system and scanning behavior of three forest passerines that form heterospecific flocks.

Authors:  Bret A Moore; Megan Doppler; Jordan E Young; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Chestnut-crowned babbler calls are composed of meaningless shared building blocks.

Authors:  Sabrina Engesser; Jennifer L Holub; Louis G O'Neill; Andrew F Russell; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Hook tool manufacture in New Caledonian crows: behavioural variation and the influence of raw materials.

Authors:  Barbara C Klump; Shoko Sugasawa; James J H St Clair; Christian Rutz
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Monkeys perform as well as apes and humans in a size discrimination task.

Authors:  Vanessa Schmitt; Iris Kröger; Dietmar Zinner; Josep Call; Julia Fischer
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.