Barbara C Klump1, Shoko Sugasawa2, James J H St Clair3, Christian Rutz4. 1. Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Sir Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK. bck3@st-andrews.ac.uk. 2. Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Sir Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK. ss244@st-andrews.ac.uk. 3. Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Sir Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK. jsc20@st-andrews.ac.uk. 4. Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Sir Harold Mitchell Building, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK. christian.rutz@st-andrews.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: New Caledonian crows use a range of foraging tools, and are the only non-human species known to craft hooks. Based on a small number of observations, their manufacture of hooked stick tools has previously been described as a complex, multi-stage process. Tool behaviour is shaped by genetic predispositions, individual and social learning, and/or ecological influences, but disentangling the relative contributions of these factors remains a major research challenge. The properties of raw materials are an obvious, but largely overlooked, source of variation in tool-manufacture behaviour. We conducted experiments with wild-caught New Caledonian crows, to assess variation in their hooked stick tool making, and to investigate how raw-material properties affect the manufacture process. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, we showed that New Caledonian crows' manufacture of hooked stick tools can be much more variable than previously thought (85 tools by 18 subjects), and can involve two newly-discovered behaviours: 'pulling' for detaching stems and bending of the tool shaft. Crows' tool manufactures varied significantly: in the number of different action types employed; in the time spent processing the hook and bending the tool shaft; and in the structure of processing sequences. In Experiment 2, we examined the interaction of crows with raw materials of different properties, using a novel paradigm that enabled us to determine subjects' rank-ordered preferences (42 tools by 7 subjects). Plant properties influenced: the order in which crows selected stems; whether a hooked tool was manufactured; the time required to release a basic tool; and, possibly, the release technique, the number of behavioural actions, and aspects of processing behaviour. Results from Experiment 2 suggested that at least part of the natural behavioural variation observed in Experiment 1 is due to the effect of raw-material properties. CONCLUSIONS: Our discovery of novel manufacture behaviours indicates a plausible scenario for the evolutionary origins, and gradual refinement, of New Caledonian crows' hooked stick tool making. Furthermore, our experimental demonstration of a link between raw-material properties and aspects of tool manufacture provides an alternative hypothesis for explaining regional differences in tool behaviours observed in New Caledonian crows, and some primate species.
BACKGROUND: New Caledonian crows use a range of foraging tools, and are the only non-human species known to craft hooks. Based on a small number of observations, their manufacture of hooked stick tools has previously been described as a complex, multi-stage process. Tool behaviour is shaped by genetic predispositions, individual and social learning, and/or ecological influences, but disentangling the relative contributions of these factors remains a major research challenge. The properties of raw materials are an obvious, but largely overlooked, source of variation in tool-manufacture behaviour. We conducted experiments with wild-caught New Caledonian crows, to assess variation in their hooked stick tool making, and to investigate how raw-material properties affect the manufacture process. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, we showed that New Caledonian crows' manufacture of hooked stick tools can be much more variable than previously thought (85 tools by 18 subjects), and can involve two newly-discovered behaviours: 'pulling' for detaching stems and bending of the tool shaft. Crows' tool manufactures varied significantly: in the number of different action types employed; in the time spent processing the hook and bending the tool shaft; and in the structure of processing sequences. In Experiment 2, we examined the interaction of crows with raw materials of different properties, using a novel paradigm that enabled us to determine subjects' rank-ordered preferences (42 tools by 7 subjects). Plant properties influenced: the order in which crows selected stems; whether a hooked tool was manufactured; the time required to release a basic tool; and, possibly, the release technique, the number of behavioural actions, and aspects of processing behaviour. Results from Experiment 2 suggested that at least part of the natural behavioural variation observed in Experiment 1 is due to the effect of raw-material properties. CONCLUSIONS: Our discovery of novel manufacture behaviours indicates a plausible scenario for the evolutionary origins, and gradual refinement, of New Caledonian crows' hooked stick tool making. Furthermore, our experimental demonstration of a link between raw-material properties and aspects of tool manufacture provides an alternative hypothesis for explaining regional differences in tool behaviours observed in New Caledonian crows, and some primate species.
Authors: A Whiten; J Goodall; W C McGrew; T Nishida; V Reynolds; Y Sugiyama; C E Tutin; R W Wrangham; C Boesch Journal: Nature Date: 1999-06-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Carel P van Schaik; Marc Ancrenaz; Gwendolyn Borgen; Birute Galdikas; Cheryl D Knott; Ian Singleton; Akira Suzuki; Sri Suci Utami; Michelle Merrill Journal: Science Date: 2003-01-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Christian Rutz; Barbara C Klump; Lisa Komarczyk; Rosanna Leighton; Joshua Kramer; Saskia Wischnewski; Shoko Sugasawa; Michael B Morrissey; Richard James; James J H St Clair; Richard A Switzer; Bryce M Masuda Journal: Nature Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: James J H St Clair; Barbara C Klump; Jessica E M van der Wal; Shoko Sugasawa; Christian Rutz Journal: Biol J Linn Soc Lond Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 2.138
Authors: Christian Rutz; Shoko Sugasawa; Jessica E M van der Wal; Barbara C Klump; James J H St Clair Journal: R Soc Open Sci Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 2.963
Authors: Matthew P Steele; Linda E Neaves; Barbara C Klump; James J H St Clair; Joana R S M Fernandes; Vanessa Hequet; Phil Shaw; Peter M Hollingsworth; Christian Rutz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 11.205