Literature DB >> 20053077

What is binocular vision for? A birds' eye view.

Graham R Martin1.   

Abstract

It is proposed that with the possible exception of owls, binocularity in birds does not have a higher order function that results in the perception of solidity and relative depth. Rather, binocularity is a consequence of the requirement of having a portion of the visual field that looks in the direction of travel; hence, each eye must have a contralateral projection that gives rise to binocularity. This contralateral projection is necessary to gain a symmetrically expanding optic flow-field about the bill. This specifies direction of travel and time to contact a target during feeding or when provisioning chicks. In birds that do not need such control of their bill, binocular field widths are very small, suggesting that binocular vision plays only a minor role in the control of locomotion. In the majority of birds, the function of binocularity would seem to lie in what each eye does independently rather than in what the two eyes might be able to do together. The wider binocular fields of owls may be the product of an interaction between enlarged eyes and enlarged outer ears, which may simply prevent more lateral placement of the eyes.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20053077     DOI: 10.1167/9.11.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  27 in total

Review 1.  The subtlety of simple eyes: the tuning of visual fields to perceptual challenges in birds.

Authors:  Graham R Martin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Vision, touch and object manipulation in Senegal parrots Poicephalus senegalus.

Authors:  Zoe P Demery; Jackie Chappell; Graham R Martin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Eye movements of vertebrates and their relation to eye form and function.

Authors:  Michael F Land
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Comparative analysis of vestibular ecomorphology in birds.

Authors:  Roger B J Benson; Ethan Starmer-Jones; Roger A Close; Stig A Walsh
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Optic flow cues help explain altitude control over sea in freely flying gulls.

Authors:  Julien R Serres; Thomas J Evans; Susanne Åkesson; Olivier Duriez; Judy Shamoun-Baranes; Franck Ruffier; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Hawk eyes I: diurnal raptors differ in visual fields and degree of eye movement.

Authors:  Colleen T O'Rourke; Margaret I Hall; Todd Pitlik; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Extreme binocular vision and a straight bill facilitate tool use in New Caledonian crows.

Authors:  Jolyon Troscianko; Auguste M P von Bayern; Jackie Chappell; Christian Rutz; Graham R Martin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Interspecific differences in the visual system and scanning behavior of three forest passerines that form heterospecific flocks.

Authors:  Bret A Moore; Megan Doppler; Jordan E Young; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Budgerigar flight in a varying environment: flight at distinct speeds?

Authors:  Ingo Schiffner; Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Chestnut-crowned babbler calls are composed of meaningless shared building blocks.

Authors:  Sabrina Engesser; Jennifer L Holub; Louis G O'Neill; Andrew F Russell; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.