Literature DB >> 23039643

Quantitative comparison of noise texture across CT scanners from different manufacturers.

Justin B Solomon1, Olav Christianson, Ehsan Samei.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantitatively compare noise texture across computed tomography (CT) scanners from different manufacturers using the noise power spectrum (NPS).
METHODS: The American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom (Gammex 464, Gammex, Inc., Middleton, WI) was imaged on two scanners: Discovery CT 750HD (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI), and SOMATOM Definition Flash (Siemens Healthcare, Germany), using a consistent acquisition protocol (120 kVp, 0.625∕0.6 mm slice thickness, 250 mAs, and 22 cm field of view). Images were reconstructed using filtered backprojection and a wide selection of reconstruction kernels. For each image set, the 2D NPS were estimated from the uniform section of the phantom. The 2D spectra were normalized by their integral value, radially averaged, and filtered by the human visual response function. A systematic kernel-by-kernel comparison across manufacturers was performed by computing the root mean square difference (RMSD) and the peak frequency difference (PFD) between the NPS from different kernels. GE and Siemens kernels were compared and kernel pairs that minimized the RMSD and |PFD| were identified.
RESULTS: The RMSD (|PFD|) values between the NPS of GE and Siemens kernels varied from 0.01 mm(2) (0.002 mm(-1)) to 0.29 mm(2) (0.74 mm(-1)). The GE kernels "Soft," "Standard," "Chest," and "Lung" closely matched the Siemens kernels "B35f," "B43f," "B41f," and "B80f" (RMSD < 0.05 mm(2), |PFD| < 0.02 mm(-1), respectively). The GE "Bone," "Bone+," and "Edge" kernels all matched most closely with Siemens "B75f" kernel but with sizeable RMSD and |PFD| values up to 0.18 mm(2) and 0.41 mm(-1), respectively. These sizeable RMSD and |PFD| values corresponded to visually perceivable differences in the noise texture of the images.
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to use the NPS to quantitatively compare noise texture across CT systems. The degree to which similar texture across scanners could be achieved varies and is limited by the kernels available on each scanner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039643     DOI: 10.1118/1.4752209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  31 in total

1.  Quantifying the effect of slice thickness, intravenous contrast and tube current on muscle segmentation: Implications for body composition analysis.

Authors:  Georg Fuchs; Yves R Chretien; Julia Mario; Synho Do; Matthias Eikermann; Bob Liu; Kai Yang; Florian J Fintelmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Effect of Reducing Field of View on Multidetector Quantitative Computed Tomography Parameters of Airway Wall Thickness in Asthma.

Authors:  Ajay Sheshadri; Alfonso Rodriguez; Ryan Chen; James Kozlowski; Dana Burgdorf; Tammy Koch; Jaime Tarsi; Rebecca Schutz; Brad Wilson; Kenneth Schechtman; Joseph K Leader; Eric A Hoffman; Mario Castro; Sean B Fain; David S Gierada
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Matching and Homogenizing Convolution Kernels for Quantitative Studies in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Dennis Mackin; Rachel Ger; Skylar Gay; Cristina Dodge; Lifei Zhang; Jinzhong Yang; Aaron Kyle Jones; Laurence Court
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Investigating the Robustness Neighborhood Gray Tone Difference Matrix and Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix Radiomic Features on Clinical Computed Tomography Systems Using Anthropomorphic Phantoms: Evidence From a Multivendor Study.

Authors:  Usman Mahmood; Aditya P Apte; Joseph O Deasy; C Ross Schmidtlein; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Model-based CT performance assessment and optimization for iodinated and noniodinated imaging tasks as a function of kVp and body size.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Samuel Richard; Lynne Lurwitz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Low-dose dual-energy CT for stone characterization: a systematic comparison of two generations of split-filter single-source and dual-source dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Dominik Nakhostin; Thomas Sartoretti; Matthias Eberhard; Bernhard Krauss; Daniel Müller; Hatem Alkadhi; André Euler
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-07

7.  Utility of second-generation single-energy metal artifact reduction in helical lung computed tomography for patients with pulmonary arteriovenous malformation after coil embolization.

Authors:  Yudai Asano; Akihiro Tada; Takayoshi Shinya; Yoshihisa Masaoka; Toshihiro Iguchi; Shuhei Sato; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  Accounting for reconstruction kernel-induced variability in CT radiomic features using noise power spectra.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafiq-Ul-Hassan; Geoffrey G Zhang; Dylan C Hunt; Kujtim Latifi; Ghanim Ullah; Robert J Gillies; Eduardo G Moros
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-12-14

9.  Methods for CT automatic exposure control protocol translation between scanner platforms.

Authors:  Sarah E McKenney; J Anthony Seibert; Ramit Lamba; John M Boone
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Statistical model based iterative reconstruction in clinical CT systems. Part III. Task-based kV/mAs optimization for radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Ke Li; Daniel Gomez-Cardona; Jiang Hsieh; Meghan G Lubner; Perry J Pickhardt; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.