Literature DB >> 23034015

Are obstetric anal sphincter ruptures preventable?-- large and consistent rupture rate variations between the Nordic countries and between delivery units in Norway.

Katariina Laine1, Wenche Rotvold, Anne Cathrine Staff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study changes in the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter rupture (OASR) during recent years in Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway and hospital-based incidence in recent years in Norway.
DESIGN: Retrospective birth register study.
SETTING: Unselected population of delivering women in four Nordic countries. SAMPLE: All deliveries (574 175) registered in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, 2004-2010.
METHODS: Parity data, including maternal, obstetrical and fetal characteristics, were obtained. The incidence of OASR was calculated from vaginal deliveries. A chi-squared test was used to analyse differences between countries and time periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of OASR.
RESULTS: During the study period, the OASR incidence in Finland was notably lower (0.7-1.0%) than in the other three Nordic countries (4.2-2.3%). A significant and constant reduction in OASR incidence was observed in Norway only (from 4.1 to 2.3%, from 2004 to 2010, p < 0.001). This reduction occurred simultaneously with introduction of a national intervention program of improved delivery techniques that aimed to reduce the incidence of OASR. No major alterations in maternal or fetal risk factors for OASR or registration routines could explain this rapid reduction in the rate of OASR. Differences in the incidence of OASR between Norwegian delivery units were significant, with a threefold difference when comparing the units with lowest and highest incidences.
CONCLUSIONS: Obstetric anal sphincter rupture seems to be preventable to a considerable extent, as indicated by the rapid and lasting reduction of OASR incidence after implementation of perineal protection programs in Norway. Improved delivery techniques should be implemented in all delivery units to prevent OASR as much as possible.
© 2012 The Authors © 2012 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23034015     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  17 in total

1.  Modeling manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Robert Zemcik; Libor Lobovsky; Katariina Laine
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Single prior caesarean section and risk of anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Bobby D O'Leary; Ciara E Nolan; Vineta Ciprike
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  The role of thumb and index finger placement in manual perineal protection.

Authors:  Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Libor Lobovsky; Ludek Hyncik; Jaroslava Karbanova; Zdenek Rusavy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Sexual activity and dyspareunia the first year postpartum in relation to degree of perineal trauma.

Authors:  Kathrine Fodstad; Anne Cathrine Staff; Katariina Laine
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Levator ani defects and the severity of symptoms in women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Sissel H Oversand; Anne C Staff; Leiv Sandvik; Ingrid Volløyhaug; Rune Svenningsen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy use among obstetricians and midwives in Viet Nam.

Authors:  Anh T Trinh; Christine L Roberts; Amanda J Ampt
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  The burden of OASIS increases along with socioeconomic position--register-based analysis of 980,733 births in Finland.

Authors:  Sari Räisänen; Rufus Cartwright; Mika Gissler; Michael R Kramer; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prevalence and Risk Indicators for Anal Incontinence among Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Katariina Laine; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Leiv Sandvik; Anne Cathrine Staff
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-05-29

Review 9.  Does the Finnish intervention prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mette Østergaard Poulsen; Mia Lund Madsen; Anne-Cathrine Skriver-Møller; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Swati Jha; Victoria Parker
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.