Literature DB >> 23029344

Beclin-1 expression is a significant predictor of survival in patients with lymph node-positive gastric cancer.

Qi-Rong Geng1, Da-Zhi Xu, Long-Jun He, Jia-Bing Lu, Zhi-Wei Zhou, You-Qing Zhan, Yue Lu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beclin 1 is a main actor of autophagy. The expression of Beclin 1 and its prognostic role in gastric cancer is largely unexplored. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the expression of beclin 1 in gastric cancer cells, tissues and its relationship with prognosis.
METHODS: The expression of Beclin 1 was detected in 271 specimens of lymph-node positive gastric cancer patients by immunohistochemistry. The correlation of Beclin 1 expression to clinicopathologic features and survival of gastric cancer was studied. Beclin-1 expression in gastric cancer cell lines and clinical specimens is also detected using reverse transcription-PCR and Western blotting.
RESULTS: Beclin 1 is up-regulated at both mRNA and protein levels in six gastric cancer cell lines compared with those in normal gastric mucosa cell line (GES-1). The expression of Beclin-1 in gastric clinical specimens is also higher than those in the adjacent noncancerous tissues. Of the 271 patients, 229 (84.5%) were Beclin 1 high expression tumors by immunohistochemistry. Beclin 1 expression is closely associated with intravascular embolus. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed high beclin 1 expression was associated with longer overall survival. Both univariate analysis and multivariate analysis revealed that Beclin 1 expression were independent prognostic factors in the patients with node-positive gastric cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings strongly suggest that Beclin 1 has a potential role in tumorigenesis of gastric cancer and could be a promising biomarker for predicting the prognosis of patients with lymph node-positive gastric cancer. It might also serve as a novel therapeutic target for gastric cancer treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23029344      PMCID: PMC3459952          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Gastric cancer remains a major public health problem worldwide, specially in East Asian countries, the age-standardized incidence rate is >20 per 100,000 [1]. For the advanced gastric cancer, its prognosis is still poor, with an estimated overall 5-year survival rate of 25% or less [2], [3]. Lymph node metastasis is the most powerful prognostic indicator following curative resection [4]–[7]. About 75% of advanced patients have node-positive gastric cancer, whose prognosis were significantly worse than for those with node-negative disease [4]. In previous studies, we have found positive lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic indicator to the patients with node-positive gastric cancer and intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be beneficial [8], [9]. However, a fundamental step toward improving the survival of patients with lymph node-positive gastric cancer lies in the increased understanding of the tumor biological behavior and searching for the possible targets for individual therapy [10], [11]. For example, the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has become now a new marker of gastric cancer following evidence-based principles [12].Adding trastuzumab to standard chemotherapy could change the poor survival of patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer [13]–[15]. Recently, the role of autophagy in cancer development and cancer treatment has been given great concern [16]–[18]. Beclin 1, a key regulator of autophagy formation, was found overexpression in a variety of human cancers [19]–[22]. However, there are still relatively few studies that have investigated the association between Beclin 1 and gastric cancer. In particular, no data regarding their effects on prognosis in gastric cancer, have yet been reported. The present study investigated Beclin 1 expression in gastric cancer cells, tissues and its clinicopathologic significance in patients with lymph node-positive gastric cancer. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationships between the Beclin 1 expression with the prognosis to determine whether Beclin 1 can predict clinical outcome.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and culture conditions

Human gastric cancer cell lines HGC-27, MKN803,MGC-803,SGC-7901,MKN-28,BGC-823 were gifts from Peking University School of Oncology (Beijing, P.R. China.) [23], [24]. The normal gastric mucosa cell line, GES-1, derived from a human fetal gastric mucosa epithelium, was obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat-Sen University [25]. These cell lines were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), penicillin (100 units/mL) and streptomycin (100 units/mL) at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.

Reverse transcription-PCR

Total RNA was extracted by using TRIzol method. The RNA was pretreated with DNase and used for cDNA synthesis with random hexamers. The mixture (25 µL total) for PCR consisted of 0.5 µl cDNA, 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase, 2.5 µl of 10× PCR buffer, 2.5 mM dNTP mixture, and 50 pM sense and antisense primers each. Beclin 1 were analyzed by following primers: Beclin 1 5′CGTGGAATGGAATGAGAT3′ reverse primer 5′ GTAAGGAACAAGTCGGTAT3′; Actin: 5′AGCCATGTACGTAGCCATCC3′ and 5′ GTGGTGGTGAAGCTGTAGC 3′.

Western blot analysis

Cells were lysed in lysis buffer and the concentration of protein was determined by the Bradford dye method (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Equal amounts of cell extract were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad). Expression of Beclin 1 was determined with a rabbit monoclonal antibody (1∶1000, Novus Biologicals, NB500-249) according to the manufacturer's suggested protocols.

Patients studied

The study consisted of 271 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical resection for histologically confirmed gastric carcinoma from Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University between January 1998 and December 2006. We obtained informed consent from all participants involved in this study. Ethical approval was obtained from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center research ethics committee. The eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed R0 resection, which was defined as no macroscopic and microscopic residual tumor and postoperative survival time ≥6 months. Patients with distant metastases or preoperative therapy or lymph node-negative were excluded from the study. The 7thTNM classification by the American Joint Committee on Cancer and International Union Against Cancer criteria was used for pathologic staging [26]. All patients had follow-up after surgery at 6 to 12 month intervals; Median follow up period was 38 (range 10 to 145) months for all patients. Overall survival was defined as was defined as the period between the time of surgery and death or was censored at the last follow-up.

Immunohistochemistry

Beclin 1 was detected with a rabbit monoclonal antibody (1∶100, Novus Biologicals, NB500-249). All tumor specimens were obtained from surgically resected gastric cancers before adjuvant therapy. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were stored at room temperature identified by an identification number. The procedures were done similarly to the method previously described [23]. The immunostained sections were evaluated and tissues from human prostate adenocarcinomas served as positive control. All slides were evaluated by two independent observers based on the proportion of positively stained tumor cells and intensity of staining. According to recently described criteria for rating Beclin 1 expression, the intensity of membrane staining varied from weak to strong: 0(no staining), 1(weak staining), 2 (moderate staining) and and 3 (intense staining) [27]. The percentage of positive tumor cells was scored as 0 (<5%), 1 (6% to 25%), 2 (26% to 50%), 3 (51% to 70%) and 4 (>70%). Staining index was calculated by totaling the staining intensity score and the percentage of positive cells score. Immunoreactive score equal or higher than 4 was used to classify tumors with high Beclin 1 expression, and a staining score below 4 was used to indicate low Beclin 1 expression.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software (version 18 for Windows; SPSS, Chicago, IL). Differences at P<.05 were considered to be statistically significant. The association of Beclin-1 expression with various clinicalopathologic features was analyzed using the chi-square test. Survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard model (backward, stepwise) for multivariable analysis was applied for factors that achieved significance in univariable analysis.

Results

Beclin 1 expression in gastric cancer cell lines

Overexpression of Beclin 1 has been reported in many cancers. Its expression status in gastric cancer cell lines, however, remains unclear. To determine the expression levels of beclin-1 transcripts and protein, semi-quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis and western blotting analysis were conducted separately in normal human gastric epithelial cells (GES-1) and six gastric cancer cell lines (HGC-27,MKN803,MGC-803,SGC-7901, MKN-28,BGC-823). We found that Beclin 1 mRNA and protein expression level up-regulated in all six gastric cancer cell lines compared with normal gastric epithelial cells GES-1. (Fig. 1 A and B)
Figure 1

Expression of Beclin 1 mRNA and protein in cells and tissues.

(A) Beclin 1 mRNA expression level up-regulated in gastric cancer cell lines compared with normal gastric epithelial cells by reverse transcription-PCR. (B) Beclin 1 protein expression level up-regulated in gastric cancer cell lines compared with normal gastric epithelial cells by western blotting. (C) Beclin 1 mRNA expression is elevated in primary gastric tumors compared with paired gastric adjacent noncancerous tissues by reverse transcription-PCR. (D) Beclin 1 protein expression is elevated in primary gastric tumors compared with paired gastric adjacent noncancerous tissues by western blotting.

Expression of Beclin 1 mRNA and protein in cells and tissues.

(A) Beclin 1 mRNA expression level up-regulated in gastric cancer cell lines compared with normal gastric epithelial cells by reverse transcription-PCR. (B) Beclin 1 protein expression level up-regulated in gastric cancer cell lines compared with normal gastric epithelial cells by western blotting. (C) Beclin 1 mRNA expression is elevated in primary gastric tumors compared with paired gastric adjacent noncancerous tissues by reverse transcription-PCR. (D) Beclin 1 protein expression is elevated in primary gastric tumors compared with paired gastric adjacent noncancerous tissues by western blotting.

Beclin 1 expression in gastric cancer tissues

To determine beclin-1 mRNA and protein expression in gastric cancer tissues, 4 paired gastric cancer tissues and noncancerous tissues adjacent to cancer lesions were detected by reverse transcription-PCR analysis and western blotting analysis, separately. It was found that Beclin-1 in all four tumor tissue specimens had a significantly higher expression at both mRNA and protein levels than those in the normal tissue adjacent to tumors from the same patients (Fig. 1 C and D).

Beclin 1 expression in gastric cancer

To investigate whether beclin-1 could clinically correlate with gastric cancer progression, expression and subcellular localization of Beclin 1 protein was detected by immunohistochemistry in 271 paraffin-embedded gastric cancer tissues. Specific Beclin 1 staining was mostly found on the membrane-plasma and cytoplasm in the cancer cells, occasionally the nucleus. Figure 2 shows representative examples of Beclin 1 immunostaining. Of the 271 patients, 229 (84.5%) were Beclin 1 high expression tumors.
Figure 2

Representative examples of Beclin1 expression.

High Beclin 1 (A) and low Beclin 1 (B) expression in human gastric cancer specimens (×400), Beclin 1 positive staining in the tumor and negative staining in normal adjacent mucosa(×20) (C).

Representative examples of Beclin1 expression.

High Beclin 1 (A) and low Beclin 1 (B) expression in human gastric cancer specimens (×400), Beclin 1 positive staining in the tumor and negative staining in normal adjacent mucosa(×20) (C).

Survival analysis

Patients with Beclin 1 low expression gastric cancer showed significantly shorter 5-year overall survival rates (OS, p = .011; Fig. 3) and disease free survival (DFS, p = .010; Fig. 4) than those with Beclin 1 high expression ones. The expression of Beclin 1 is closely associated with intravascular embolus (P =  0.017). However, there was no significant correlation between the expression level of Beclin 1 and age, sex, site, tumor size, T classification, N classification, or pathologic stage of gastric cancer patients (Table 1). Beclin 1 expression, site, intravascular embolus, pathologic T classification, pathologic N classification and pathologic stage were independent prognostic factors in univariate analysis (data not shown).In multivariable analysis, Beclin 1 expression, intravascular embolus, site and pathologic stage were significant independent prognostic factor for survival time (Table 2).
Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of survival.

Patients with high expression Beclin 1 showed significantly longer overall survival than those with Beclin 1 low expression. (p = .011).

Figure 4

Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of disease free survival (DFS).

Patients with high expression Beclin 1 showed significantly longer DFS than those with Beclin 1 low expression. (p = .010).

Table 1

Clinicopathologic correlation of beclin1 expression in gastric cancer.

FactorsNo. of patients (%) p
Beclin 1 low expressionBeclin 1 high expression
Age (y)0.402
<6019122
≥6023107
Sex0.465
Male28165
Female1464
Site0.343
Cardia-fundus 20132
Corpus 833
Antrum 1158
two or more sites 36
Tumor size0.401
≤4 cm1175
>4 cm32153
Intravascular embolus0.017
No34212
Yes817
Pathologic T classification0.917
T2318
T3852
T4a25133
T4b626
Pathologic N classification0.620
N11276
N21489
N3a1247
N3b417
Pathologic stage (pTNM)0.441
IIA26
IIB431
IIIA762
IIIB1470
IIIC1560
Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analysis of different prognostic variables in patients with gastric cancer by cox regression analysis.

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
No. patients P Regression coefficient (SE) P Relative risk (95% confidence interval)
Beclin10.0130.044
negative42−0.495(0.200)0.663(0.444–0.989)
positive229
Site0.0000.002
upper152
Middle410.5420.128(0.210)0.7110.923(0.603–1.412)
lower690.032−0.436(0.203)0.0070.574(0.384–0.859)
Diffuse90.0011.213(0.354)0.0252.275(1.106–4.680)
Intravascular embolus0.0000.000
No2460.996(0.232)2.862(1.776–4.613)
Yes25
Pathologic stage (pTNM)0.0000.000
IIA8
IIB350.5290.396(0.629)0.3131.890(0.549–6.509)
IIIA690.4060.501(0.603)0.1682.313(0.703–7.615)
IIIB840.1180.928(0.594)0.0593.079(0.957–9.904)
IIIC750.0181.406(0.593)0.0055.295(1.637–17.124)

Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of survival.

Patients with high expression Beclin 1 showed significantly longer overall survival than those with Beclin 1 low expression. (p = .011).

Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of disease free survival (DFS).

Patients with high expression Beclin 1 showed significantly longer DFS than those with Beclin 1 low expression. (p = .010).

Discussion

Autophagy is a self-degradation mechanism and associated with tumor progression. Beclin 1, a mammalian orthologue of yeast Atg6, plays a crucial role in the vesicle nucleation process of autophagy [28]. It is a gene indispensable for the first phases of autophagy [29]–[30]. The current study has, for the first time, showed Beclin 1 is up-regulated at both mRNA and protein levels in six gastric cancer cell lines compared with those in normal gastric epithelial cells GES-1. We also revealed Beclin 1 expression is elevated in primary gastric tumors compared with four paired gastric cancer samples adjacent to tumors from the same patients by reverse transcription-PCR and western blotting. The results differ from those reported in liver cancer cells and cervical cancer cells, which showed Beclin 1 expression significantly lower compared to the corresponding normal tissues [31], [32]. The possible explaination is that beclin-1 expression in gastric cancers contribute to the induction of autophagic cell death, thereby producing selective pressure to override cell death during development the cancer [27], [33]. In present study, we observed that 229 (84.5%) patients had high expression Beclin 1 in 271 gastric cancer patients, in line with the finding of the previous study by Ahn et al.Their data showed no or very weak expression of Beclin1 in normal mucosal cells of stomach by immunohistochemistry [27]. However, they did not explore the beclin-1 expression at mRNA level in cell lines, nor investigate its role in the prognosis. We then analyzed the relationship between the expression of beclin-1 and clinical characteristics of the patients. There was no significant correlation between the expression of beclin-1 and age, gender, T classification, N classification, or stage of patients with gastric cancer. Interesting, in our current study, there was a significant relationship between the expression of beclin-1 and intravascular embolus. It suggesting that beclin-1 could be used as a marker intravascular embolus in the patients with node-positive gastric cancer. These observations highlight the important role of beclin-1 in the development of gastric cancer. Furthermore, we found low beclin-1 expression was strongly associated with decreased survival in gastric cancer patients (P = 0.011) and the intravascular embolus subset (P = 0.017). In multivariable analysis, Beclin-1 expression retained its independence as a prognostic factor(P = 0.044). These results suggest a potentially promising usefulness of beclin-1 as a prognostic and survival indicator. The mechanism is still not clear. The alternative explanation for this may be that beclin-1 expression in gastric cancers limits chromosomal instability and decreases the frequency of additional mutation [34]. To our knowledge, the study is the first report that Beclin 1 had a significantly higher expression in gastric cancer cells and tissues at both mRNA and protein levels compared to their normal counterparts. Moreover, we found high beclin 1 expression was associated with longer overall survival. Both univariate analysis and multivariate analysis showed Beclin 1 expression, site, intravascular embolus and pathologic stage were independent prognostic factors. The results strongly suggest that Beclin 1 has a potential role in tumorigenesis of gastric cancer. It could be a promising biomarker and a novel therapeutic strategies to patients with lymph node-positive gastric cancer. Further studies are also needed to clarify the mechanism by which autophagy actor Beclin 1 is involved in the development and progression of gastric cancer.
  33 in total

1.  Prognostic indicators in node-negative advanced gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Hirohiko Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Kenji Fukuda; Shigeru Tatebe; Shunichi Tsujitani; Masahide Ikeguchi
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Prognostic significance of Beclin 1-dependent apoptotic activity in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ying-Hong Shi; Zhen-Bin Ding; Jian Zhou; Shuang-Jian Qiu; Jia Fan
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 16.016

3.  D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuru Sasako; Takeshi Sano; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Yukinori Kurokawa; Atsushi Nashimoto; Akira Kurita; Masahiro Hiratsuka; Toshimasa Tsujinaka; Taira Kinoshita; Kuniyoshi Arai; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Kunio Okajima
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Positive lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after d2 resection regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.

Authors:  Da-zhi Xu; Qi-rong Geng; Zi-jie Long; You-qing Zhan; Wei Li; Zhi-wei Zhou; Ying-bo Chen; Xiao-wei Sun; Gong Chen; Quentin Liu
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Gastric cancer.

Authors:  Henk H Hartgrink; Edwin P M Jansen; Nicole C T van Grieken; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Beclin 1-mediated macroautophagy involves regulation of caspase-9 expression in cervical cancer HeLa cells.

Authors:  Zan-hong Wang; Li Xu; Zhen-ling Duan; Li-qin Zeng; Nai-hong Yan; Zhi-lan Peng
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Decreased expression of autophagy-related proteins in malignant epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Dan-Dan Li; Lin-Lin Wang; Rong Deng; Xiao-Feng Zhu
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 16.016

8.  Expression of beclin-1, an autophagy-related protein, in gastric and colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Chang Hyeok Ahn; Eun Goo Jeong; Jong Woo Lee; Min Sung Kim; Sung Hee Kim; Sung Soo Kim; Nam Jin Yoo; Sug Hyung Lee
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 9.  Role and regulation of autophagy in cancer.

Authors:  Ning Chen; Vassiliki Karantza-Wadsworth
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-01-02

10.  Downregulation of ABI1 expression affects the progression and prognosis of human gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Meihua Cui; Weidong Yu; Jianqiang Dong; Jie Chen; Xiuru Zhang; Yulan Liu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.064

View more
  14 in total

1.  The role of beclin-1 expression in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pu Xia; Jin-Jin Wang; Bao-Bao Zhao; Chang-Liang Song
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-08-14

2.  TEM7 (PLXDC1), a key prognostic predictor for resectable gastric cancer, promotes cancer cell migration and invasion.

Authors:  Zi-Zhen Zhang; Rong Hua; Jun-Feng Zhang; Wen-Yi Zhao; En-Hao Zhao; Lin Tu; Chao-Jie Wang; Hui Cao; Zhi-Gang Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 3.  Autophagy knocked down by high-risk HPV infection and uterine cervical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Xueli Li; Zhengyuan Gong; Linglin Zhang; Chen Zhao; Xianda Zhao; Xin Gu; Honglei Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

4.  Over expression of GPR30, indicating poor prognosis and promoting proliferation, upregulates Beclin-1 expression via p38MAPK signaling in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression.

Authors:  Shibin Yang; Liang Deng; Yuanhui Lai; Zhaoguo Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2018-07-01

5.  UNC51-like kinase 1 as a potential prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hongtao Xu; Hong Yu; Xiaoyan Zhang; Xiaoying Shen; Kehao Zhang; Haihui Sheng; Shengbin Dai; Hengjun Gao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-03-15

Review 6.  The prognostic value of autophagy-related markers beclin-1 and microtubule-associated protein light chain 3B in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuyu He; Xianda Zhao; Narishka Roz Subahan; Lifang Fan; Jun Gao; Honglei Chen
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-17

Review 7.  Functional role of autophagy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hao-ran Qian; Yi Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-05

8.  Role of Beclin1 expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chaojie Liang; Wei Li; Hua Ge; Kaitong Zhang; Guangming Li; Jixiang Wu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Reduced expression of autophagy markers correlates with high-risk human papillomavirus infection in human cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hua-Yi Wang; Gui-Fang Yang; Yan-Hua Huang; Qi-Wen Huang; Jun Gao; Xian-DA Zhao; Li-Ming Huang; Hong-Lei Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Inhibition of autophagy promotes metastasis and glycolysis by inducing ROS in gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Wenjie Qin; Chao Li; Wen Zheng; Qingqu Guo; Yuefeng Zhang; Muxing Kang; Bo Zhang; Bin Yang; Baozhong Li; Haijun Yang; Yulian Wu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.