Literature DB >> 18669424

D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer.

Mitsuru Sasako1, Takeshi Sano, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Yukinori Kurokawa, Atsushi Nashimoto, Akira Kurita, Masahiro Hiratsuka, Toshimasa Tsujinaka, Taira Kinoshita, Kuniyoshi Arai, Yoshitaka Yamamura, Kunio Okajima.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for curable gastric cancer in eastern Asia. Whether the addition of para-aortic nodal dissection (PAND) to D2 lymphadenectomy for stage T2, T3, or T4 tumors improves survival is controversial. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial at 24 hospitals in Japan to compare D2 lymphadenectomy alone with D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND in patients undergoing gastrectomy for curable gastric cancer.
METHODS: Between July 1995 and April 2001, 523 patients with curable stage T2b, T3, or T4 gastric cancer were randomly assigned during surgery to D2 lymphadenectomy alone (263 patients) or to D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND (260 patients). We did not permit any adjuvant therapy before the recurrence of cancer. The primary end point was overall survival.
RESULTS: The rates of surgery-related complications among patients assigned to D2 lymphadenectomy alone and those assigned to D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND were 20.9% and 28.1%, respectively (P=0.07). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the frequencies of anastomotic leakage, pancreatic fistula, abdominal abscess, pneumonia, or death from any cause within 30 days after surgery (the rate of death was 0.8% in each group). The median operation time was 63 minutes longer and the median blood loss was 230 ml greater in the group assigned to D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND. The 5-year overall survival rate was 69.2% for the group assigned to D2 lymphadenectomy alone and 70.3% for the group assigned to D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND; the hazard ratio for death was 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.37; P=0.85). There were no significant differences in recurrence-free survival between the two groups; the hazard ratio for recurrence was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.42; P=0.56).
CONCLUSIONS: As compared with D2 lymphadenectomy alone, treatment with D2 lymphadenectomy plus PAND does not improve the survival rate in curable gastric cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00149279.) 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18669424     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  346 in total

Review 1.  Gastric adenocarcinoma with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a borderline resectable cancer?

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kodera; Daisuke Kobayashi; Chie Tanaka; Michitaka Fujiwara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Feasibility study of early oral intake after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Jo; Oh Jeong; Jang Won Sun; Mi Ran Jeong; Seong Yeop Ryu; Young Kyu Park
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.720

Review 3.  Gastric cancer surgery: an American perspective on the current options and standards.

Authors:  Joyce Wong; Patrick Jackson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-03

4.  The impact of abdominal shape index of patients on laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toshiyasu Ojima; Makoto Iwahashi; Mikihito Nakamori; Masaki Nakamura; Katsunari Takifuji; Masahiro Katsuda; Takeshi Iida; Toshiaki Tsuji; Keiji Hayata; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  The long-term efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in early and advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A decade in gastric cancer curative surgery: Evidence of progress (1999-2009).

Authors:  Stefano Rausei; Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Francesca Rovera; Luigi Boni; Caterina Valerii; Luisa Giavarini; Francesco Frattini; Renzo Dionigi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-03-27

7.  Safe management of anastomotic leakage after gastric cancer surgery with enteral nutrition via a nasointestinal tube.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Akashi; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Xiaohua Jiang; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Definition and classification of complications of gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on the accordion severity grading system.

Authors:  Mi Ran Jung; Young Kyu Park; Jang Won Seon; Kwang Yong Kim; Oh Cheong; Seong Yeob Ryu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Michele Orditura; Gennaro Galizia; Vincenzo Sforza; Valentina Gambardella; Alessio Fabozzi; Maria Maddalena Laterza; Francesca Andreozzi; Jole Ventriglia; Beatrice Savastano; Andrea Mabilia; Eva Lieto; Fortunato Ciardiello; Ferdinando De Vita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  [Limitations of surgery for cancer of the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  E Karakas; C Oetzmann von Sochaczewski; T Haist; M Pauthner; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.