Literature DB >> 23026252

Femur positioning in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Tilman Pfitzner1, Eric Röhner, Bernd Preininger, Carsten Perka, Georg Matziolis.   

Abstract

Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results in better restoration of neutral mechanical axis than does the conventional technique. Nevertheless, coronal malalignment has not been eliminated. It is yet unknown whether errors in implant positioning occur more on the femoral side, more on the tibial side, or equally on both sides. The hypothesis of this study was that a predominance of coronal component malalignment exists on the tibial side in navigated tibia-first TKA.Fifty-seven consecutive navigated (OrthoPilot; B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) TKAs were included in this retrospective study. Pre- and postoperative digital whole-leg standing radiographs were analyzed. Coronal alignment was measured for the whole leg pre- and postoperatively. Lateral distal femur angle and medial proximal tibia angle were analyzed on the preoperative radiographs. On the postoperative radiographs, coronal alignment of the femoral and tibial components were measured separately in reference to the tibial and femoral mechanical axis. The coronal alignment improved from 8.2° ± 3.7° preoperatively to 1.1° ± 1.2° postoperatively, with 5 (8%) outliers outside the 3° window. The femoral component was malaligned (0.6° ± 0.6°), whereas the tibial component showed a significantly higher deviation from the mechanical axis of 1.0° ± 1.1° (P=.009). The femoral component was positioned more precisely than the tibial component. The latter influences gap management in the tibia-first technique and may thereby have a relevant effect on joint stability. Accuracy of the surgical technique and differences in the mathematical algorithm for the determination of landmarks are possible reasons for the difference in precision between the femoral and tibial component positioning. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23026252     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120919-57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

1.  Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Matthew P Abdel; Philipp von Roth; Carsten Perka; Hagen Hommel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The surgical epicondylar axis is a consistent reference of the distal femur in the coronal and axial planes.

Authors:  Hideo Kobayashi; Yasushi Akamatsu; Ken Kumagai; Yoshihiro Kusayama; Ryo Ishigatsubo; Shuntaro Muramatsu; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Kinematic femoral alignment with gap balancing and patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Hagen Hommel; Matthew P Abdel; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-10-06

4.  Small Improvements in Postoperative Outcome with Gap Balancing Technique Compared with Measured Resection in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hagen Hommel; Daniel Kunze; Peggy Hommel; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-11-10

5.  The Accuracy of Alignment Determined by Patient-Specific Instrumentation System in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kwangkyoun Kim; Jungsung Kim; Dokyoung Lee; Sohui Lim; Jiyoon Eom
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-03-01

Review 6.  Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Instrument.

Authors:  Kwang Kyoun Kim; Stephen M Howell; Ye Yeon Won
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.759

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.