Literature DB >> 23025514

Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions.

Anja Zembic1, Adrian Bösch, Ronald E Jung, Christoph H F Hämmerle, Irena Sailer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test the survival rates, and the technical and biological complication rates of customized zirconia and titanium abutments 5 years after crown insertion.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with 40 single implants in maxillary and mandibular canine and posterior regions were included. The implant sites were randomly assigned to zirconia abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns or titanium abutments supporting metal-ceramic crowns. Clinical examinations were performed at baseline, and at 6, 12, 36 and 60 months of follow-up. The abutments and reconstructions were examined for technical and/or biological complications. Probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque control record (PCR) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP) were assessed at abutments (test) and analogous contralateral teeth (control). Radiographs of the implants revealed the bone level (BL) on mesial (mBL) and distal sides (dBL). Data were statistically analyzed with nonparametric mixed models provided by Brunner and Langer and STATA (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: Eighteen patients with 18 zirconia and 10 titanium abutments were available at a mean follow-up of 5.6 years (range 4.5-6.3 years). No abutment fracture or loss of a reconstruction occurred. Hence, the survival rate was 100% for both. Survival of implants supporting zirconia abutments was 88.9% and 90% for implants supporting titanium abutments. Chipping of the veneering ceramic occurred at three metal-ceramic crowns supported by titanium abutments. No significant differences were found at the zirconia and titanium abutments for PPD (meanPPDZrO2 3.3 ± 0.6 mm, mPPDTi 3.6 ± 1.1 mm), PCR (mPCRZrO2 0.1 ± 0.3, mPCRTi 0.3 ± 0.2) and BOP (mBOPZrO2 0.5 ± 0.3, mBOPTi 0.6 ± 0.3). Moreover, the BL was similar at implants supporting zirconia and titanium abutments (mBLZrO2 1.8 ± 0.5, dBLZrO2 2.0 ± 0.8; mBLTi 2.0 ± 0.8, dBLTi 1.9 ± 0.8).
CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically or clinically relevant differences between the 5-year survival rates, and the technical and biological complication rates of zirconia and titanium abutments in posterior regions.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23025514     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  25 in total

1.  Influence of CAD/CAM zirconia for implant-abutment manufacturing on gingival fibroblasts and oral keratinocytes.

Authors:  A M Pabst; C Walter; A Bell; M Weyhrauch; I Schmidtmann; H Scheller; K M Lehmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of pro-inflammatory cytokines and bone metabolism mediators around titanium and zirconia dental implant abutments following a minimum of 6 months of clinical function.

Authors:  Christopher A Barwacz; Kim A Brogden; Clark M Stanford; Deborah V Dawson; Erica N Recker; Derek Blanchette
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Impact of abutment material on peri-implant soft tissue color. An in vitro study.

Authors:  Leticia Sala; Antonio Bascones-Martínez; Ana Carrillo-de-Albornoz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Fracture behavior of zirconia implant abutments is influenced by superstructure-geometry.

Authors:  Frank P Nothdurft; Konrad Neumann; Andreas W Knauber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Clinical outcomes of zirconia-based implant- and tooth-supported single crowns.

Authors:  Farahnaz Nejatidanesh; Hedayat Moradpoor; Omid Savabi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Stock Versus CAD/CAM Customized Zirconia Implant Abutments - Clinical and Patient-Based Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ulf Schepke; Henny J A Meijer; Wouter Kerdijk; Gerry M Raghoebar; Marco Cune
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 3.932

7.  Effect of Clinically Relevant CAD/CAM Zirconia Polishing on Gingival Fibroblast Proliferation and Focal Adhesions.

Authors:  Nicholas G Fischer; Jeffrey Wong; Andrew Baruth; D Roselyn Cerutis
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Influence of implant location on the clinical outcomes of implant abutments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amr G ElHoussiney; He Zhang; Jinlin Song; Ping Ji; Lu Wang; Sheng Yang
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-02-26

9.  Technical and Biological Complications of Screw-Retained (CAD/CAM) Monolithic and Partial Veneer Zirconia for Fixed Dental Prostheses on Posterior Implants Using a Digital Workflow: A 3-Year Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Paolo De Angelis; Giulio Gasparini; Francesca Camodeca; Silvio De Angelis; Margherita Giorgia Liguori; Edoardo Rella; Francesca Cannata; Antonio D'Addona; Paolo Francesco Manicone
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Findings of a Four-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two-Piece and One-Piece Zirconia Abutments Supporting Single Prosthetic Restorations in Maxillary Anterior Region.

Authors:  Guerino Paolantoni; Gaetano Marenzi; Andrea Blasi; Jolanda Mignogna; Gilberto Sammartino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.