Human IgG Fc glycosylation modulates immunological effector functions such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis. Engineering of Fc glycans therefore enables fine-tuning of the therapeutic properties of monoclonal antibodies. The N-linked glycans of Fc are typically complex-type, forming a network of noncovalent interactions along the protein surface of the Cγ2 domain. Here, we manipulate the mammalian glycan-processing pathway to trap IgG1 Fc at sequential stages of maturation, from oligomannose- to hybrid- to complex-type glycans, and show that the Fc is structurally stabilized following the transition of glycans from their hybrid- to complex-type state. X-ray crystallographic analysis of this hybrid-type intermediate reveals that N-linked glycans undergo conformational changes upon maturation, including a flip within the trimannosyl core. Our crystal structure of this intermediate reveals a molecular basis for antibody biogenesis and provides a template for the structure-guided engineering of the protein-glycan interface of therapeutic antibodies.
Human IgG Fc glycosylation modulates immunological effector functions such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis. Engineering of Fc glycans therefore enables fine-tuning of the therapeutic properties of monoclonal antibodies. The N-linked glycans of Fc are typically complex-type, forming a network of noncovalent interactions along the protein surface of the Cγ2 domain. Here, we manipulate the mammalian glycan-processing pathway to trap IgG1 Fc at sequential stages of maturation, from oligomannose- to hybrid- to complex-type glycans, and show that the Fc is structurally stabilized following the transition of glycans from their hybrid- to complex-type state. X-ray crystallographic analysis of this hybrid-type intermediate reveals that N-linked glycans undergo conformational changes upon maturation, including a flip within the trimannosyl core. Our crystal structure of this intermediate reveals a molecular basis for antibody biogenesis and provides a template for the structure-guided engineering of the protein-glycan interface of therapeutic antibodies.
Antibodies are multifunctional glycoproteins,
able to bind antigens
through variable Fab domains and cellular receptors via the constant
Fc region. This dual functionality enables the recruitment of the
cellular immune system to sites of infection by antibody-dependent
cellular cytotoxity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis
(ADCP), and can lead to the localized activation of the complement
system. Glycan and protein engineering of the Fc domain can generate
therapeutic monoclonal antibodies with tailored receptor binding functionality.[1,2] In contrast to chemical and chemoenzymatic methods to modulate glycan
structures,[3−9] we use glycosidase inhibitors and a cell line deficient in a glycosyltransferase
to generate antibody glycoforms containing specific carbohydrate structures.The Fc region of immunoglobulin G (IgG) is a homodimer consisting
primarily of heavy chain Cγ2 and Cγ3 domains. The C-terminal
Cγ3 domain protomers interact through an extended protein–protein
interface, occluding over 1100 Å2 of protein surface,[10] and adopt rigid conformations that exhibit little
structural variation.[11] In contrast, the
Cγ2 domain protomers have only been observed to interact via
glycan–glycan contacts between opposing N-linked chains at
Asn297.[11−13] Glycan-mediated maintenance of the spacing between
the Cγ2 domains is critical for cellular Fcγ receptor
(FcγR) binding, which occurs asymmetrically at the tip of the
Cγ2 domains and lower hinge region.[14] Deglycosylation, for example, by bacterial endoglycosidases, leads
to disruption of Cγ2 spacing and significantly impairs FcγR
binding.[15,16]The impact of Asn297 glycosylation
upon Fc structure is not limited
to influencing Cγ2 spacing. IgG Fc glycosylation also stabilizes
the protein through an approximately 500 Å2 glycan–protein
interface along the surface of the Cγ2 domain.[11,13,17] These glycan–protein contacts
are believed to limit both the processing by Golgi-resident glycosyltransferases
and the conformational freedom of the glycan.[18] This model is supported by an NMR study, which proposes that Fc
glycans exist in an equilibrium with an approximately equal proportion
of a “free” state, with highly mobile glycans, and a
less mobile “bound” state, observable by X-ray crystallography,
with ordered protein–glycan interactions less accessible to
enzymatic processing.[19]The composition
of IgG Fc glycans is largely directed by the protein.[18,20] The glycosylation exhibits limited processing and consists of a
predominantly biantennary complex-type framework with partial occupancy
of galactose, core α1→6-linked fucose, low levels of
“bisecting” GlcNAc, and sialic acid.[18] This limited processing is in contrast to the highly sialylated
complex-type glycosylation typically observed on secreted glycoproteins.[18]The human FcγRs (FcγRI, FcγRIIa,
FcγRIIb,
and FcγRIIIa) display binding properties dependent upon the
presence and composition of the Fc glycan.[1] For example, afucosylated antibody glycoforms, which may find utility
in anticancer treatment, are inflammatory and exhibit enhanced ADCC
due to elevated binding to the activatory FcγRIIIa.[21] In contrast, anti-inflammatory IgG glycoforms
display increased levels of terminal sialylation and are under investigation
for enhanced intravenous immunoglobulin therapy.[22]Biosynthetic Fc precursors have also been investigated
for therapeutic
applications due to their altered FcγR-dependent effector functions.[9,23−26] Monoclonal antibodies found in the early steps of carbohydrate maturation
including oligomannose- or afucosylated hybrid-type glycans, for example,
display increased affinity for FcγRIIIa and enhanced ADCC functionality,[24,26] albeit with potentially elevated serum clearance.[27,28] Here, we have generated and characterized a panel of such glycoform
intermediates and present the crystal structure of the key precursor
bearing hybrid-type glycosylation. In the context of the biosynthetic
pathway of N-linked carbohydrates, this glycoform represents the intermediate
formed between the immature oligomannose and the native, complex-type
states.[29] This Fc glycoform, generated
by recombinant mammalian protein expression in the presence of the
Golgi α-mannosidase II inhibitor, swainsonine,[30,31] was crystallized and subjected to X-ray crystallographic analysis
to 2.4 Å resolution. Examination of this structure reveals a
novel interaction between carbohydrate and protein components. Together
with thermostability analyses, the structure provides a model for
the conformational transitions that IgG Fc undergoes upon glycoprotein
maturation and provides a template for the structure-guided engineering
of therapeutic antibodies.
Results and Discussion
Expression and Purification of IgG Fc Glycoforms
A
panel of IgG1 Fc glycoforms, corresponding to key stages of the mammalian
N-linked biosynthesis after calnexin/calreticulin-mediated protein
folding,[29,32] was generated using either a lectin-resistant
cell line deficient in glycosyltransferase activity or by the use
of glycosidase inhibitors (Figure 1).
Figure 1
The N-linked
glycosylation processing pathway (left) and MALDI-TOF
MS analysis of associated IgG1 Fc glycoforms (right). Following protein
folding and hydrolysis of the glucose cap, glycoforms were isolated
by stalling the pathway at sequential stages of biogenesis. (A) The
Man9GlcNAc2 glycoform resulted from α-mannosidase
(MI) inhibition with kifunensine. (B) The Man5GlcNAc2 glycoform resulted from expression in a GlcNAc transferase
(GnT) I-deficient cell line. (C) Hybrid-type glycosylation resulted
from expression in the presence of the Golgi α-mannosidase II
(GMII) inhibitor, swainsonine. (D) Complex-type glycosylation resulted
from activity of Golgi-resident glycosyltransferases. Ions are [M
+ Na]+. The sialylated glycan is also present as a sodium
salt. The following symbols were used to represent glycans[33] and are shown as a key in panel D: yellow ⧫,
galactose; blue ■, GlcNAc; green ●, Man; red ⧫
with black dot, fucose; pink ★, sialic acid. Linkage positions
are shown by the angle of the lines linking the sugar residues (vertical
line, 2-link; forward slash, 3-link; horizontal line, 4-link; back
slash, 6-link). Anomericity is indicated by unbroken lines for β-bonds
and broken lines for α-bonds.
The N-linked
glycosylation processing pathway (left) and MALDI-TOF
MS analysis of associated IgG1 Fc glycoforms (right). Following protein
folding and hydrolysis of the glucose cap, glycoforms were isolated
by stalling the pathway at sequential stages of biogenesis. (A) The
Man9GlcNAc2 glycoform resulted from α-mannosidase
(MI) inhibition with kifunensine. (B) The Man5GlcNAc2 glycoform resulted from expression in a GlcNAc transferase
(GnT) I-deficient cell line. (C) Hybrid-type glycosylation resulted
from expression in the presence of the Golgi α-mannosidase II
(GMII) inhibitor, swainsonine. (D) Complex-type glycosylation resulted
from activity of Golgi-resident glycosyltransferases. Ions are [M
+ Na]+. The sialylated glycan is also present as a sodium
salt. The following symbols were used to represent glycans[33] and are shown as a key in panel D: yellow ⧫,
galactose; blue ■, GlcNAc; green ●, Man; red ⧫
with black dot, fucose; pink ★, sialic acid. Linkage positions
are shown by the angle of the lines linking the sugar residues (vertical
line, 2-link; forward slash, 3-link; horizontal line, 4-link; back
slash, 6-link). Anomericity is indicated by unbroken lines for β-bonds
and broken lines for α-bonds.We isolated IgG1 Fc bearing Man9GlcNAc2,
Man5GlcNAc2, hybrid-, and complex-type glycan
structures. These glycoforms are generally representative of the carbohydrates
appearing in the ER, and the early, medial, and late Golgi apparatus,
respectively.[29,34]
Glycan Analysis
The N-linked glycosylation of each
Fc glycoform was assessed by positive ion matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
(MALDI) time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) of enzymatically
released glycans (Figure 1). Expression of
Fc in the presence of the ER and Golgi α1→2-mannosidase
inhibitor, kifunensine, resulted in a largely homogeneous Man9GlcNAc2 glycan (m/z = 1905.6; Figure 1A) with limited processing
to the Man8GlcNAc2 derivative (m/z = 1743.6; Figure 1A).
Expression of the Fc region in GnT I-deficient human embryonic kidney
(HEK) 293S cells[35] resulted in a similarly
homogeneous spectrum dominated by Man5GlcNAc2 glycans (m/z = 1257.4; Figure 1B).The next glycoform in the N-linked biosynthetic
pathway, the hybrid-type glycan, was isolated using the Golgi α-mannosidase
II inhibitor, swainsonine. Swainosine prevents hydrolysis of the ManA and ManB saccharides of the “6-arm”
of the trimannosyl core.[30,31] However, this inhibition
does not impede the addition of a GlcNAc residue to the “3-arm”
Man4 by GnT I or subsequent structural elaborations.[36] Consistent with this mode of action, MALDI-TOF
MS analysis of the N-linked glycans of IgG1 Fc expressed with 10 μM
swainsonine revealed an heterogeneous spectrum of putative hybrid-type
glycans indicating variable terminal β1→4-linked galactose,
“bisecting” β1→4-linked GlcNAc, and a population
of sialylated hybrid-type glycans (m/z = 2081.7; Figure 1C). Finally, Fc bearing
complex-type glycans were generated using HEK 293T cells with no inhibitors
present. MALDI-TOF MS analysis revealed biantennary complex-type glycans
with variable terminal galactose (Figure 1D).
This spectrum is consistent with previous observations that Fc glycosylation
is highly protein-directed[20] and substantially
less processed than other glycoproteins similarly expressed using
the pHLSec expression vector in HEK 293T cells.[37,38]Levels of both galactose and sialic acid in the hybrid-type
spectrum
were higher than those observed for the complex-type glycoforms. As
sialic acid can alter the ionization efficiency of glycans in mass
spectrometry,[39] we also subjected the hybrid
and complex-type glycans to electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry
(Figure 2). No sialylated structures were detected
by ESI–MS of the glycans released from the Fc glycoform bearing
complex-type glycans (Figure 2B). In contrast,
the spectrum of glycans deriving from Fc expressed in the presence
of swainsonine contained a prominent peak at m/z 2035.7 corresponding to a sialylated core-fucosylated
hybrid-type glycan (Figure 2A).
Figure 2
Negative ion electrospray
mass spectra of recombinant IgG1 Fc N-linked
glycans following expression in the (A) presence and (B) absence of
the Golgi α-mannosidase II inhibitor, swainsonine. Neutral glycan
ions are [M + H2PO4]−, sialylated
glycans are [M – H]−. Symbols for the structures
are as described in Figure 1. Isomeric assignments
were determined by ESI–MS/MS (Figure 3). The presence of a minor population of Man4-based hybrids
was detected in the fragmentation spectra by very low abundance 1,3A3 ions at m/z 424 (Figure 3B,D).
Negative ion electrospray
mass spectra of recombinant IgG1 Fc N-linked
glycans following expression in the (A) presence and (B) absence of
the Golgi α-mannosidase II inhibitor, swainsonine. Neutral glycan
ions are [M + H2PO4]−, sialylated
glycans are [M – H]−. Symbols for the structures
are as described in Figure 1. Isomeric assignments
were determined by ESI–MS/MS (Figure 3). The presence of a minor population of Man4-based hybrids
was detected in the fragmentation spectra by very low abundance 1,3A3 ions at m/z 424 (Figure 3B,D).
Figure 3
Negative ion fragmentation
spectra of the major N-linked glycans
from the hybrid-type gycoform of IgG1 Fc. Neutral glycan ions are
[M + H2PO4]−, while the sialylated
glycan forms a [M – H]− ion. (A) Sialylated,
fucosylated hybrid glycan (Man5Gal1GlcNAc3Fuc1NeuNAc1), m/z 2035.7. (B) Bisected, fucosylated hybrid glycan (Man5GlcNAc4Fuc1), m/z 1883.6. (C) Fucosylated hybrid glycan (Man5Gal1GlcNAc3Fuc1), m/z 1842.6. (D) Agalactosylated, fucosylated hybrid
glycan (Man5GlcNAc3Fuc1), m/z 1680.5. The nomenclature describing
fragmentation ions follows that of Domon and Costello[45] and is distinct from the carbohydrate residue labels (Figure 1).
Isomeric assignments of the hybrid-type structures
were determined
by negative-ion ESI MS/MS of the enzymatically released glycans. The
fragmentation spectra of the most abundant species are presented in
Figure 3. The m/z values of the “D-type ions”, as defined by Harvey,[40] are a signature of the 6-arm. These D-type ions
are annotated in the spectra and are formed by the formal loss of
the 3-arm and the fucosylated di-N-acetylchitobiose
core. Similarly, the D′-type ions, formed by cleavage of the
6-arm, reveal the cluster of mannose residues on the 6-arm. Bisecting
GlcNAc residues are revealed by an abundant [D – 221]− ion at m/z 629 and the virtual
absence of a D-type ion[41] (Figure 3B). The absence of an ion at m/z 306 shows that the sialic acid residue is α2→3-linked
(Figure 3A).[42,43] This linkage
contrasts α2→6-linked sialic acid observed in serum-derived
antibodies.[44]Negative ion fragmentation
spectra of the major N-linked glycans
from the hybrid-type gycoform of IgG1 Fc. Neutral glycan ions are
[M + H2PO4]−, while the sialylated
glycan forms a [M – H]− ion. (A) Sialylated,
fucosylated hybrid glycan (Man5Gal1GlcNAc3Fuc1NeuNAc1), m/z 2035.7. (B) Bisected, fucosylated hybrid glycan (Man5GlcNAc4Fuc1), m/z 1883.6. (C) Fucosylated hybrid glycan (Man5Gal1GlcNAc3Fuc1), m/z 1842.6. (D) Agalactosylated, fucosylated hybrid
glycan (Man5GlcNAc3Fuc1), m/z 1680.5. The nomenclature describing
fragmentation ions follows that of Domon and Costello[45] and is distinct from the carbohydrate residue labels (Figure 1).To assess the level of sialic acid in the hybrid-type
glycans,
we expressed an intact IgG1 antibody hybrid-type glycoform and subjected
the fluorescently derivatized glycans to normal-phase HPLC. This analysis
revealed that 20% of these swainsonine-induced hybrid-type glycans
were sialylated (Figure 4A). Consistent with
our MALDI–MS and ESI–MS data of IgG1 Fc glycans, no
sialylated structures were observed in IgG produced in the absence
of swainsonine (Figure 4B).
Figure 4
HPLC analysis of fluorescently labeled
N-linked glycans from recombinant
IgG1expressed in HEK 293T cells in (A) the presence and (B) the absence
of the GnT I inhibitor, swainsonine. The lower panels show the spectra
of glycans following digestion with sialidase. Symbols for the structures are as described in Figure 1.
Swainsonine
is not known to affect galactosyltransferase or sialyltransferase
activity, as confirmed by the similar glycan profiles of the same
glycoproteins expressed in HEK 293T cells in the presence of swainsonine
and in HEK 293T Lec36 cells that are devoid of Golgi α-mannosidase
II activity.[38] Similarly, there was no
evidence of increased terminal processing upon disruption of Golgi
α-mannosidase II activity as compared to glycoproteins expressed
in HEK 293T cells.[38] Therefore, the increased
abundance of galactose and sialic acid residues in the 3-arm of the
hybrid-type glycoform, as compared to the complex glycoform, may be
indicative of increased steric accessibility of the Fc glycans to
processing enzymes.
Thermodynamic Stability of Fc Glycoforms
One explanation
for the increased 3-arm processing of the hybrid-type glycoform as
compared to that of the complex-type glycan is that the accessibility
of the glycans is influenced by composition and structure of the glycan–protein
interface. Because of the highly processed composition of the hybrid-type
glycoform, we hypothesized it would exhibit distinct glycan–protein
packing interactions with altered stability. We assessed our panel
of Fc glycoforms by differential scanning flourimetry (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Thermodynamic stability of IgG1 Fc glycoforms. Single
thermostability
measurements of oligomannose (Man9GlcNAc2),
hybrid, and complex-type glycoforms are shown. Measurements were performed
in triplicate.
This analysis revealed that relative to
the melting temperature (Tm) of the complex-type
glycoform, the other glycoforms exhibited reduced Tm values: Man9GlcNAc2 (Tm = −2.8 ± 0.7 °C), hybrid-type glycoforms
(Tm = −4.0 ± 0.7 °C),
and endoglycosylated-treated Fc (−5.2 ± 1.0 °C).
Therefore, in addition to reducing glycan accessibility to glycosyltransferases,
the enzymatic action of Golgi α-mannosidase II, to produce complex-type
glycans, is permissive for the biosynthesis of a more thermally stabilized
Fc structure. We sought to investigate the structural basis for this
observation by X-ray crystallography.HPLC analysis of fluorescently labeled
N-linked glycans from recombinant
IgG1expressed in HEK 293T cells in (A) the presence and (B) the absence
of the GnT I inhibitor, swainsonine. The lower panels show the spectra
of glycans following digestion with sialidase. Symbols for the structures are as described in Figure 1.Thermodynamic stability of IgG1 Fc glycoforms. Single
thermostability
measurements of oligomannose (Man9GlcNAc2),
hybrid, and complex-type glycoforms are shown. Measurements were performed
in triplicate.
Structural Characterization of the Hybrid-Type Fc Glycoform
Crystallographic structures of IgG Fc have been reported for a
number of glycoforms ranging from oligomannose Man9GlcNAc2, to homogeneous complex-type, and endoglycosidase-deactivated
and aglycosylated states.[11,15,37,46] However, no crystallographic
information is available for the hybrid-type Fc glycoform that represents
the biosynthetic transition point between oligomannose and complex-type
glycosylation states. We determined the crystal structure of this
key intermediate (Table 1).
Table 1
Crystallographic Data and Refinement
Statistics
Data Collection
beamline
BM-14
resolution range (Å)
50.0–2.36(2.44–2.36)a
space group
P212121
cell dimensions
a, b, c (Å)
49.0, 72.9, 140.8
α, β,
γ (deg)
90.0, 90.0, 90.0
wavelength (Å)
0.953
unique reflections
21 447 (2094)
completeness (%)
99.3 (98.7)
Rmerge (%)b
9.9 (65.3)
I/σI
16.5 (2.4)
avg redundancy
4.8 (4.5)
Refinement
resolution range (Å)
40.0–2.36(2.42–2.36)
no. of reflections
21 379 (1459)
Rwork (%)c
21.5
Rfree (%)d
26.6
rmsde
bonds (Å)
0.006
angles (deg)
1.2
molecules
per asuf
1
atoms per asu (protein/carbohydrate/water)
3183/93/218
average B-factors (Å2) (protein/carbohydrate/water)
43.2/84.7/36.8
model quality (Ramachandran plot)g
most favored region
(%)
99.5
allowed region
0.5
Numbers in parentheses refer to
the relevant outer resolution shell.
Rmerge = ∑∑|I(hkl;i) – ⟨I(hkl)⟩|/∑∑I(hkl;i), where I(hkl;i) is the intensity
of an individual measurement and ⟨I(hkl)⟩ is the average intensity from multiple observations.
Rwork = ∑||Fobs| – k|Fcalc||/∑|Fobs|.
Rfree is calculated as for Rwork, but using
only 5% of the data, which were sequestered prior to refinement.
rmsd: root-mean-square deviation
from ideal geometry.
asu:
asymmetric unit.
Ramachandran
plots were calculated
with Molprobity.[49]
The hybrid-type
glycoform crystallized in the primitive orthorhombic spacegroup, P212121, with one homodimer
in the asymmetric unit. The Cγ3 protomers were very similar
in structure (0.3 Å root-mean-square deviation over 103 equivalent
Cα residues) and exhibited noncrystallographic 2-fold rotational
symmetry. However, the orientations of the Cγ2 protomers were
arranged such that they introduced asymmetry to the homodimer, as
has been frequently observed[47,48] (Figure 6A,B). The protein and carbohydrate components of the Cγ2
domain of one chain (referred to here as chain A) were largely ordered,
while those from the other (chain B) exhibited higher B-values where some Cγ3-distal loop regions and associated glycan
residues were disordered and not clearly visible in the electron density
(Figure 6A).
Figure 6
Crystal structure of the hybrid-type glycoform of human IgG1 Fc.
(A) The Fc structure with the protein moiety shown as a gray ribbon
with the N-linked glycan of N297 shown as sticks. Carbohydrate residues
are colored and labeled as in Figure 1. A maximum
likelihood weighted 2Fo – Fc electron density map is plotted around the
glycan at 1σ. (B) Panel A rotated 70° with a close-up view
of the protein and carbohydrate components of the Cγ2 domain
from chain A of the hybrid Fc crystal structure. No electron density
was observed for the processed 3-arm beyond Man4. (C)
Overlay of the protein backbone of the hybrid (gray), oligomannose
(cyan; PDB accession code 2WAH), and complex-type (pink; PDB accession code 3AVE) glycoforms. (D)
The overlay in panel C rotated 90° with a dashed line corresponding
to a 17 Å distance between equivalent Ser298 Cα atoms in
the hybrid- and complex-type glycoforms.
Numbers in parentheses refer to
the relevant outer resolution shell.Rmerge = ∑∑|I(hkl;i) – ⟨I(hkl)⟩|/∑∑I(hkl;i), where I(hkl;i) is the intensity
of an individual measurement and ⟨I(hkl)⟩ is the average intensity from multiple observations.Rwork = ∑||Fobs| – k|Fcalc||/∑|Fobs|.Rfree is calculated as for Rwork, but using
only 5% of the data, which were sequestered prior to refinement.rmsd: root-mean-square deviation
from ideal geometry.asu:
asymmetric unit.Ramachandran
plots were calculated
with Molprobity.[49]Crystal structure of the hybrid-type glycoform of human IgG1 Fc.
(A) The Fc structure with the protein moiety shown as a gray ribbon
with the N-linked glycan of N297 shown as sticks. Carbohydrate residues
are colored and labeled as in Figure 1. A maximum
likelihood weighted 2Fo – Fc electron density map is plotted around the
glycan at 1σ. (B) Panel A rotated 70° with a close-up view
of the protein and carbohydrate components of the Cγ2 domain
from chain A of the hybrid Fc crystal structure. No electron density
was observed for the processed 3-arm beyond Man4. (C)
Overlay of the protein backbone of the hybrid (gray), oligomannose
(cyan; PDB accession code 2WAH), and complex-type (pink; PDB accession code 3AVE) glycoforms. (D)
The overlay in panel C rotated 90° with a dashed line corresponding
to a 17 Å distance between equivalent Ser298 Cα atoms in
the hybrid- and complex-type glycoforms.The different configurations of the Cγ2 domains
may arise
due to differences in stabilizing crystallographic packing interactions.
This hypothesis is supported by analysis of the crystalline assembly.[10] This analysis reveals that the Cγ2 domain
of the more ordered chain A exhibits 37% more buried surface area
with symmetry-related molecules than does the corresponding domain
in chain B.
Biosynthetic Conformational Transitions
Overall Conformation
In chain A of our hybrid-type
glycoform, we observe electron density for eight saccharide residues,
corresponding to the entirety of the fucosylated oligomannose component
of the hybrid-type glycan (Figure 6B). No electron
density was observed for the processed 3-arm beyond Man4. The 3-arm is entirely solvent exposed with the nearest component
of a symmetry-related molecule located 9 Å away. While we cannot
formally exclude the possibility of selective crystallization of a
subset of hybrid-type glycoforms, this distance, and the large accessible
volume surrounding the 3-arm, provides no evidence for such a phenomenon.From the observation that the conformations of complex-type glycans
are not influenced by the presence of fucose,[46] we suggest that the structure of the Man5GlcNAc2 component of the hybrid-type glycan reported herein is likely to
resemble the Man5GlcNAc2 glycoform that occurs
in the preceding stage of the pathway (Figure 1). This assertion, combined with analysis of the previously reported
Man9GlcNAc2 Fc structure[47] and the series of complex-type structures by Krapp et al.,[11] now enables us to propose a model of glycan
maturation during antibody biogenesis.The folded Man9GlcNAc2 glycoform is generated
following the hydrolysis of the glucose cap and consequent release
from the calnexin/calreticulin folding check-point.[32] All available structures of Fc glycoforms show a conserved
mode of interaction of the saccharide residues proximal to the protein
attachment site. The Manβ1→4GlcNAcβ1→4GlcNAc
core and the observable 3-arm residues exhibit highly similar conformations
and glycan–protein packing interactions. In contrast, the 6-arm
residues exhibit divergent conformations reflecting the different
chemical compositions and/or surrounding environments of the glycan
residues (Figure 7).
Figure 7
Structural transitions of IgG1 Fc glycans
between (A) oligomannose-type
(PDB accession code 2WAH), (B) hybrid-type, and (C) complex-type glycosylation (PDB accession
code 3AVE),
as observed by X-ray crystallography. The left-hand column displays
the glycan packing against the Cγ2 domain. The central column
shows a view with the 6-arm in the foreground. The right-hand column
is a close-up and shows the conformational changes occurring within
the 6-arm; an asterix indicates the location of the C6 carbon of the
Man4′ residue. The protein surface is colored
gray, the F243 side-chain is colored pink, and the glycan is colored
as in Figure 1 except in the close-up where
the oxygen atoms of mannose residues are shown in red.
Transition from Man9GlcNAc2 to Man5GlcNAc2
The structural rearrangements
that occur within the oligosaccharide when carbohydrates are modified
are illustrated by the hydrolysis of terminal α1→2 mannose
residues of the Man9GlcNAc2 glycoform. The ManD3 residue in the Man9GlcNAc2 structure
anchors the oligosaccharide chain to the protein surface at the junction
of the Cγ2 and Cγ3 domains (Figure 7A). As the solvent accessible ManD1 and ManD2 residues are disordered in the crystal structure,[47] hydrolysis of ManD3 is likely to induce the
observed rearrangement of the 6-arm and cause the 6 Å shift of
ManB (Figure 7A,B). This cleavage
also results in the associated relaxation of the Man4′α1→6Man3 linkage (from φ
= 69°, ψ = −178°, ω = 62° to φ
= 77°, ψ = 101°, ω = 30°; Figure 7A,B). Despite this movement, the Man4′ residue in the Man5GlcNAc2 glycoform
is orientated in a direction opposite to that of complex-type structures
(Figure 7C). This orientation is maintained
by the presence of ManA and ManB residues
of the 6-arm that sterically prevent further rotation of the Man4′α1→6Man3 linkage (Figure 7B).
Transition from Man5GlcNAc2 to Hybrid-Type
The action of GnT I on Man5GlcNAc2 catalyzes
the formation of hybrid-type glycans and allows downstream carbohydrate
processing (Figure 1). GnT I transfers β1→2-linked
GlcNAc to the Man4 residue of the 3-arm to form the GlcNAc5β1→2Man4 linkage (Figure 7B,C). As for many structures of complex-type glycoforms,
we do not observe interpretable electron density for the solvated
and mobile residues on this arm. Additionally, GnT I catalysis also
renders the core GlcNAc residue (GlcNAc1) of the hybrid-type
glycan susceptible to α1→6-fucosylation.[36] We observe electron density for the fucose and note the
conformation closely resembles that of the complex-type glycoform
(Figure 7B,C). This supports our assertion
that Man5GlcNAc2 glycans are not affected structurally
by fucosylation.
Formation of Complex-type Glycans
Golgi α-mannosidase
II hydrolyses the α1→3-linked ManA and α1→6-linked
ManB residues from the 6-arm and is dependent upon the
prior activity of GnT I (Figure 1). Elimination
of these residues relieves steric restraints around the 6-arm and
allows the reorientation of the Man4′α1→6Man3 linkage (from φ = 77°, ψ = 101°, ω
= 30° to φ = 62° ψ =171°, ω = −175°;
Figure 7B,C), causing close alignment of the
glycan to the protein surface.Structural transitions of IgG1 Fc glycans
between (A) oligomannose-type
(PDB accession code 2WAH), (B) hybrid-type, and (C) complex-type glycosylation (PDB accession
code 3AVE),
as observed by X-ray crystallography. The left-hand column displays
the glycan packing against the Cγ2 domain. The central column
shows a view with the 6-arm in the foreground. The right-hand column
is a close-up and shows the conformational changes occurring within
the 6-arm; an asterix indicates the location of the C6 carbon of the
Man4′ residue. The protein surface is colored
gray, the F243 side-chain is colored pink, and the glycan is colored
as in Figure 1 except in the close-up where
the oxygen atoms of mannose residues are shown in red.Following this rearrangement, GnT II catalyzes
the transfer of
β1→2-linked GlcNAc to Man4′, allowing
the formation of hydrophobic stacking interactions between GlcNAc5′ and Phe243 (Figure 7C). The
formation of these canonical glycan–protein interactions is
consistent with the increased stability[17] (Figure 5 and Supporting
Information Figure S1) and decreased enzymatic processing of
the mature complex-type glycoform relative to the artificially trapped
hybrid-type glycoform (Figures 1, 2, and 4). Limited downstream compositional
heterogeneity of the complex-type glycoform subsequently arises from
the partial transfer of galactose to terminal GlcNAc5 and GlcNAc5′ residues[18] and leads to little change with respect to carbohydrate conformation
or thermal stability.[11,17]Evidence for the suppression
of galactosylation and sialylation
by the interaction between GlcNAc5′ and Phe243
is provided by the analysis of IgG from a patient with a homozygous
mutation in the Mgat2 gene.[50]Mgat2 encodes GnT II that catalyzes the transfer
of the 6-arm GlcNAc5′ to Man4′.
The IgG Fc glycans isolated from the patient lacked 6-arm GlcNAc5′ but exhibited significantly elevated 3-arm processing
as compared to wild-type structures with the majority of glycans containing
the NeuNAc7α2→6Gal6β1→4GlcNAc5 motif.[50] Together with our structural
observations, we suggest that the action of Golgi α-mannosidase
II and GnT II enhance the glycan–protein interface and limit
glycosyltransferase accessibility to the 3-arm.
Summary and Conclusions
The use of glycosidase inhibitors
and cell-lines with genetically
modified glycan processing enzymes offers a powerful route to the
isolation of glycoproteins with defined glycan structures.[34,51] These methods offer an attractive alternative to direct chemical
synthesis and can be readily combined with chemoenzmatic methodologies.[3,7,8,52,53]Analysis of isolated biosynthetic
intermediates of IgG1 Fc revealed
distinct differences in the susceptibility of discrete glycan states
to glycosyltransferases. Specifically, we have shown by mass spectrometry
that the trapped hybrid-type glycans are more readily accessible to
galactosyl and sialyltransferases than are complex-type structures.
The generation of hybrid-type glycoforms with increased Fc sialylation
is of note given the enhanced anti-inflammatory functionality exhibited
by sialylated Fc in, for example, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy.[22]The biosynthetic intermediates also exhibited
reduced stability,
an important parameter in the development of antibody therapeutics.[54] Through our X-ray crystallographic analysis,
we correlate this stability to structural transitions that occur during
antibody biogenesis. We offer a molecular-level explanation for how
stability arises from rearrangements of the glycan–protein
interface. We deduce that glycan-dependent stabilization occurs during
Golgi α-mannosidase II and GnT II processing, which respectively
cause the relaxation of the 6-arm toward the protein surface and the
formation of hydrophobic glycan–protein interfaces.Given
the promising portfolio of effector functions exhibited by
IgG bearing oligomannose and hybrid-type glycans,[15,24,25,27,28] knowledge of their three-dimensional structure and
defined molecular transitions provides a template to support structure-guided
stabilization and optimization for the clinic.
Experimental Procedures
Protein Expression and Purification
The Fc region of
human IgG1 (residues 120–329, GenBank accession no. J00228) was cloned
into the pHLSec vector[55] and transiently
expressed in HEK 293T cells (ATCC number CRL-1573), GnT I-deficient
HEK 293S cells,[35] and in the presence of
mannosidase inhibitors to isolate glycoforms of distinct composition.[34] Transfections were performed using 2 mg of DNA
per liter cell culture medium as previously described.[55] Fc bearing Man9GlcNAc2 and hybrid-type
glycosylation were obtained by expression in the presence of 20 and
10 μM of the inhibitors, kifunensine[34] and swainsonine,[31] respectively (Toronto
Research Chemicals, Canada). Inhibitors were added at the time of
transfection, and the supernatants were harvested after 5 days. IgG1
Fc glycoproteins were purified at room temperature by immobilized
metal-affinity chromatography (GE Healthcare, Bucks, UK) and size
exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200 10/30 column (Amersham,
Bucks, UK), in a buffer containing 150 mM NaCl and 10 mM Tris pH 8.0.
Yields were typically 20 mg of purified IgG1 Fc per liter cell culture.Plasmids encoding IgG1 b12 light and heavy chains were kindly provided
by Professor Dennis Burton (The Scripps Research Institute, CA). The
heavy and light chains were transiently cotransfected in HEK 293T
cells in the presence or absence of 10 μM swainsonine.[31] IgG1 b12 was purified by incubation for 2 h
with Protein A Sepharose (GE Healthcare, UK) at room temperature.
The beads were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) before
elution using 0.1 M citric acid pH 3.4 followed by neutralization
and size exclusion chromatography. Yields were typically 8 mg of purified
IgG1 b12 per liter cell culture.
Thermodynamic Stability of IgG1 Fc Glycoforms
The thermal
stability of different Fc glycoforms was assessed by differential
scanning fluorimetry using a Stratagene RT PCR 305 instrument. Thermally
induced unfolding of purified Fc glycoforms was monitored, in triplicate,
by measuring Absorbance at 610 nm at 1.5 °C increments in the
presence of Sypro Orange (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK), a fluorescent
stain sensitive to hydrophobic environments.[56]Oligosaccharides were released from
target glycoproteins with peptide-N-glycosidase F
(New Englands Biolabs) from Coomassie blue-stained NuPAGE gels.[57] Excised bands were washed five times alternatively
with acetonitrile and deionized water, and rehydrated with a 3000
units/mL of aqueous PNGase F solution. After 12 h incubation at 37
°C, the enzymatically released N-linked glycans were eluted with
water. Samples were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS with a Shimadzu AXIMA
TOF[2] MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Kratos
Analytical, Manchester, UK) fitted with delayed extraction and a nitrogen
laser (337 nm). Samples were cleaned on a Nafion 117 membrane (Aldrich),
and then prepared for MALDI-MS by adding 0.5 μL of an aqueous
solution of the glycans to the matrix solution (0.3 μL of a
solution of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid in acetonitrile:water; 1:1,
v:v) on the stainless steel target plate and allowing it to dry at
room temperature. The sample/matrix mixture was then recrystallized
from ethanol.Negative ion ESI–MS was performed with
a Waters Synapt G2 traveling wave ion mobility mass spectrometer (Waters
MS-Technologies, Manchester, UK).[58] Samples
were dissolved in a solution of methanol:water (1:1, v:v) containing
0.5 M ammonium phosphate and introduced into the instrument with Waters
thin-wall nanospray capillaries. The ESI capillary voltage was 1.2
kV, the cone voltage was 20–180 V, and the ion source temperature
was 120 °C. The T-wave velocity and peak height voltages were
450 m/s and 40 V, respectively. The T-wave mobility cell contained
nitrogen and was operated at a pressure of 0.55 mbar and was used
to provide an additional selection stage for the fragmentation experiments.
Fragmentation was performed after mobility separation in the transfer
cell with a 3 mass unit selection window and with argon as the collision
gas. The instrument was externally calibrated with sialylated N-glycans
released from bovine fetuin. Data acquisition and processing were
carried out using Waters Driftscope (version 2.1) software and MassLynx
(version 4.1).Fluorescent labeling of glycans with 2-aminobenzoic
acid (2-AA)
and subsequent HPLC analysis was performed as previously described.[59,60] Briefly, a buffered glycan solution was mixed with 2-AA and sodium
cyanoborohydride. Labeling was achieved by incubation for 1 h at 80
°C. Excess 2-AA was removed using a Spe-ed Amide-2 column (Systematic
Instruments, UK). HPLC was carried out at room temperature in a 20
mM ammonium hydroxide solution (pH 3.9) with a linear gradient of
acetonitrile and water. Exoglycosidase digestions were performed as
previously described.[60]
Crystallization and Structure Determination
Crystals
of IgG1 Fc bearing hybrid-type glycans were grown by sitting-drop
vapor diffusion using 100 nL of protein solution (11.4 mg mL–1) plus 100 nL of precipitant using the previously described semiautomated
robotics of the Oxford Protein Production Facility.[61] Crystals of IgG Fc bearing hybrid-type glycans grew at
20 °C in 20% w/v PEG 3350 pH 5.5 with 0.2 M sodium/potassium
phosphate after 4 days. Crystals were flash frozen by immersion in
a cryoprotectant containing 25% ethylene glycol and transferred to
a gaseous nitrogen stream at 100 K. Data were collected at beamline
BM14 at the European Radiation Synchrotron Facility, Grenoble, France
(Table 1). Diffraction data were integrated
and scaled using the programs DENZO and SCALEPACK,[62] and the structure was solved by molecular replacement using
the program Phaser[63] with the protein chain
from a natively glycosylated IgG Fc[46] (PDB
accession code 3AVE) as a search model. Five percent of reflections was randomly set
aside to calculate the Rfree. Generally,
the hybrid Fc structure was refined using Refmac5 in the CCP4 suite[64] and included iterative restrained refinement
with translation libration screw parametrization and incorporation
of automatically generated local noncrystallographic symmetry restraints.[65,66] The molecular graphics program Coot was used for manual rebuilding,[67] and MolProbity was used to validate the model.[49] Data processing, refinement, and structure validation
statistics are presented in Table 1.
Nomenclature
Throughout this work, we have adopted
the system of Vliegenhart et al.[68] for
labeling residues within oligomannose- and biantennary-type oligosaccharides
with the additional modifications of 7 and 7′ for sialic acid, 1′ for α1→6-linked
core fucose[69] (Figure 1). These residue labels are in bold-face throughout this Article.
The symbolic representation of glycans follows that of Harvey et al.[33] with residues in both the schematic diagrams
and the molecular graphics following the color scheme of the Centre
for Functional Glycomics. Carbohydrate fragmentation ions are labeled
using the Domon and Costello nomenclature[45] with an extension by Harvey.[70]Dihedral angles were defined using the “x – 1” system for crystallography: φ = O5–C1–O–C(x)′ and ψ = C1–O–C(x)′–C(x – 1)′ for Manα1→2Man
and Manα1→3Man, where x = 2 or 3, respectively;
φ = O5–C1–O–C6′, ψ = C1–O–C6′–C5′,
and ω = O–C6′–C5′–C4′
for Manα1→6Man linkages.[71]
Authors: Andrew M Goetze; Y Diana Liu; Zhongqi Zhang; Bhavana Shah; Edward Lee; Pavel V Bondarenko; Gregory C Flynn Journal: Glycobiology Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 4.313
Authors: Jonathan J Goodfellow; Kavitha Baruah; Keisuke Yamamoto; Camille Bonomelli; Benjamin Krishna; David J Harvey; Max Crispin; Christopher N Scanlan; Benjamin G Davis Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Max Crispin; David J Harvey; Veronica T Chang; Chao Yu; A Radu Aricescu; E Yvonne Jones; Simon J Davis; Raymond A Dwek; Pauline M Rudd Journal: Glycobiology Date: 2006-05-03 Impact factor: 4.313
Authors: Veronica T Chang; Max Crispin; A Radu Aricescu; David J Harvey; Joanne E Nettleship; Janet A Fennelly; Chao Yu; Kent S Boles; Edward J Evans; David I Stuart; Raymond A Dwek; E Yvonne Jones; Raymond J Owens; Simon J Davis Journal: Structure Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Austin W Boesch; Eric P Brown; Hao D Cheng; Maame Ofua Ofori; Erica Normandin; Peter A Nigrovic; Galit Alter; Margaret E Ackerman Journal: MAbs Date: 2014 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.857
Authors: Max Crispin; David J Harvey; David Bitto; Camille Bonomelli; Matthew Edgeworth; James H Scrivens; Juha T Huiskonen; Thomas A Bowden Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2014-02-10 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Wentao Chen; Leopold Kong; Stephen Connelly; Julia M Dendle; Yu Liu; Ian A Wilson; Evan T Powers; Jeffery W Kelly Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 5.100