Literature DB >> 23024529

Hysterectomy…..Which route?

Somajita Chakraborty1, Sebanti Goswami, Partha Mukherjee, Manabendra Sau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We designed this study to focus on women with mobile uteri benign no larger than 14 weeks, who would ordinarily be considered candidates for vaginal hysterectomy and compare the outcomes when abdominal routes were chosen. We also compared the intra and post operative complications, requirement for blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, between abdominal and vaginal route of hysterectomy.
METHOD: In a simple randomized prospective comparative study 200 consecutive patients requiring hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions were analysed over a period of 2 years. (June 2006-May 2008). Group A (n = 100) underwent vaginal hysterectomy (non descent vaginal hysterectomy, NDVH) which was compared with group B (n = 100) who had abdominal hysterectomy.
RESULTS: As far as duration of operation, duration of i.v. drip, mobilization in post operative ward, duration of hospital stay, P value was significant. Regarding blood loss P value was insignificant.
CONCLUSION: The accessibility of the vaginal passage, disease confined to the uterus and the surgeons experience are the major determining factors for the choice of the route of hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Non descent vaginal hysterectomy

Year:  2011        PMID: 23024529      PMCID: PMC3257329          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-011-0076-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  9 in total

1.  Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications.

Authors:  S R Kovac
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Quality of life, health care utilization, and costs among women undergoing hysterectomy in a managed-care setting.

Authors:  S K van den Eeden; M Glasser; S D Mathias; H H Colwell; D J Pasta; K Kunz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The mortality risk associated with hysterectomy.

Authors:  P A Wingo; C M Huezo; G L Rubin; H W Ory; H B Peterson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 311, April 2005. Appropriate use of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy.

Authors:  S R Kovac
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Changing hysterectomy patterns after introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  M B Harris; D L Olive
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Authors:  R C Dicker; J R Greenspan; L T Strauss; M R Cowart; M J Scally; H B Peterson; F DeStefano; G L Rubin; H W Ory
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6 cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jiann-Loung Hwang; Kok-Min Seow; Yieh-Loong Tsai; Lee-Wen Huang; Bih-Chwen Hsieh; Cagge Lee
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  G McCracken; D Hunter; D Morgan; J H Price
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2006-01
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of Vaginal, Abdominal, and Laparoscopic Hysterectomies.

Authors:  Anand Murari Nanavati; Sudhir B Gokral
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-09-01

2.  A Comparative Study of Non-descent Vaginal Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Authors:  M Sarada Murali; Afreen Khan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2019-04-27

3.  A Comparative Analysis of Nondescent Vaginal Hysterectomy, Laparoscopy-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy, and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Diseases at a Rural Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Vaibhav Kanti; Vandana Verma; Mamta Singh; Soniya Vishwakarma; Nupur Mittal; N P Singh
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 4.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.