Literature DB >> 31391746

A Comparative Study of Non-descent Vaginal Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

M Sarada Murali1, Afreen Khan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare intra- and post-op complications between non-descent vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy and establish the better method for hysterectomy in non-descent uterus.
METHODS: A prospective comparative study of 80 hysterectomies was done over a period of January 2017-Dec 2017, with 40 cases each in one group of non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH) and other group of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Demographic characteristics, co-morbid conditions, indications for surgery, operative time, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative analgesia requirements, post-operative hospital stay and post-operative complications were compared between both groups.
RESULTS: The most common age in both groups was 41-50 years. Fibroid uterus was the most common indication for surgery in both groups. The mean operative time in NDVH group was 40 min while it was 120 min in TLH group, and the mean blood loss in NDVH group was 50 ml, while it was 120 ml in TLH group. P < 0.001 when intraoperative blood loss and operative time were compared between both groups. There were no conversions to laparotomy in NDVH group, while there were three conversions to laparotomy in TLH group. Both groups were similar in post-operative analgesia requirement and post-operative hospital stay. Post-operative complications were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy has advantage over laparoscopic hysterectomy as scarless surgery with fewer complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic hysterectomy; NDVH; Scar less surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31391746      PMCID: PMC6661041          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-019-01227-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  6 in total

1.  Hysterectomy…..Which route?

Authors:  Somajita Chakraborty; Sebanti Goswami; Partha Mukherjee; Manabendra Sau
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2011-10-27

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 311, April 2005. Appropriate use of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  A Comparison Between Non-Descent Vaginal Hysterectomy and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Dhivya Balakrishnan; Gharphalia Dibyajyoti
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

4.  How to increase the proportion of hysterectomies performed vaginally.

Authors:  A Davies; E Vizza; N Bournas; H O'Connor; A Magos
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study.

Authors:  K McPherson; M A Metcalfe; A Herbert; M Maresh; A Casbard; J Hargreaves; S Bridgman; A Clarke
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Vaginal hysterectomy by uterine morcellation: an efficient, non-morbid procedure.

Authors:  F Mazdisnian; R B Kurzel; S Coe; M Bosuk; F Montz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.661

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Comparative Analysis of Nondescent Vaginal Hysterectomy, Laparoscopy-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy, and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Diseases at a Rural Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Vaibhav Kanti; Vandana Verma; Mamta Singh; Soniya Vishwakarma; Nupur Mittal; N P Singh
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2022-08-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.